Re: Is there any change recently on cxf website(from http---> to https)

Hey guys, Here we are [1], the redirection change took place on December 1st, which coincide with the time the schema issues started to surface. I think he change is irreversible, what are our options? Could we configure parsers to work with redirect? Update schemas to use https instead? What do y

Re: Release 3.5.0 next week?

Definitely +1, moreover it seems like Spring Framework 6.0.0 snapshots are already available. Thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 11:42 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Question for everyone: > > Would it make sense to release 3.5.0 next week?Things seem fairly > stable

Re: Change default branch to main

No objections, thanks Colm. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Feb 1, 2022, 7:59 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi, > > Most other Apache projects I work on (Camel, ActiveMQ, Karaf, etc.) > have switched to use main as the default branch, to align with what > the default branch is for new

Re: Releases soon?

+1, I will wrap up the open tickets (I think it is only one) today, thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 9:19 AM Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 to release soon > > Thanks! > Freeman > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:59 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We've r

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.5.2 and 3.4.7

+1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Apr 8, 2022, 2:21 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. This > contains a bunch of fixes related to jax-rs TCK’s as well as a bunch of > dependency updates and other fixes. > > > Staging

Re: Jakarta build hangs on test

Thanks a lot, Jim! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, May 12, 2022, 3:53 AM Jim Ma wrote: > It looks this hang issue is fixed : > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/CXF-8371/41/#showFailuresLink > > Regards, > Jim > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma wrote: > >> Hi

Re: Jenkins job CXF/pipeline/3.4.x-fixes#675 failed

Hey Colm, The build has failed because of test failures, you could see that on [Test results] tab. Since this is a pipeline with JDK matrix (3 builds in parallel), the output is a bit tricky to interpret sometimes. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jun 13, 2022, 8:29 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

This is great, thanks Jim, I will also take a look shortly. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Sep 21, 2022, 1:02 AM Jim Ma wrote: > Hi All, > I tried to remove the osgi and karaf from CXF with this draft PR : > https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/999 >

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

> merge the this PR https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/999 to the main > branch. > > Thanks, > Jim > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:06 PM Andrey Redko wrote: > >> This is great, thanks Jim, I will also take a look shortly. Thanks! >> >> Best Regards, >>

Re: WSS4J 3.0.0 update and cxf-rt-ws-security tests

Hi Colm, Thanks a lot for quick fix, I could confirm that builds are rolling again. I suspected the entropy issues but changing JDK secure random source did not help in this case. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, 7:06 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi Andriy, > >

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

Hi Jim, I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! @Colm @Dan do we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as well? With 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully), the 3.4.x is approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release. Thank you guys!

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

Works for me, thanks a lot Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > > I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! @Colm @Dan > do > > we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as well? With > > 4.0.0 out and 3.

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.1

+1, thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Dec 19, 2022, 11:53 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.1. The main features > are dependency updates (e.g. CXF 3.5.5) to pick up CVE fixes: > > Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CXF 4.0.0

Hey Jim, Happy New Year! I think Dan mentioned he was going on vacation for a few weeks. I am not sure he is back, @Colm do you know by any chance? Thank you! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 9:52 PM Jim Ma wrote: > Happy new year, everyone ! > > I see the CXF 4.0.0 releas

Re: New releases?

Hi Colm, I am cherry-picking relevant changes regularly (from @dependabot, etc) to all branches but many of them are also related to Jakarta changes and should not be backported. The only large one is HttpClient based conduit that Dan was planning to backport shortly. Thanks! Best Regards, A

Re: Request mapping warnings

Hi Jean, Indeed it looks like you have the same resource registered twice hence the warning. It may come from the use of automatic resource scans and manual resource registration. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Jul 19, 2023, 7:39 AM Jean Pierre URKENS < jean-pierre.urk...@devoteam.com> w

Re: Request mapping warnings

me instances that have nothing to do with these JAX-WS/RS > endpoints declared in this file. > > > > Is there something I can trace into to see when a service gets registered > as a *ClassResourceInfo *? > > > > Regards, > > > > J.P. Urkens > > *From:*

Re: Plans for release 4.0.4?

Thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, 10:18 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Yes, I'll call a vote today on WSS4J 3.0.3. > > Colm. > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:28 PM Freeman Fang > wrote: > > > > +1 to release Apache CXF 4.0.4 > > > > @Colm O hEigeartaigh Any chance

Re: Plans for release 4.0.4?

Hi Freeman, no objections, thank you! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, 4:33 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Team, > > If there are no other objections, I will try to do the release the coming > Tuesday. > > I will follow the document here > https://cxf.apache.org/release-manageme

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.0.4

+1, thanks Freeman! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Mar 5, 2024, 4:58 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > It’s been a while since the last release and many issues have been > addressed, so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.0.4. > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapac

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.0.4(2nd attempt)

+1, thanks again Freeman! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Mar 6, 2024, 7:48 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > It’s been a while since the last release and many issues have been > addressed, so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.0.4. > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 3.6.3 and 3.5.8

+1, thanks Freeman! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 3:43 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi, > > It’s been a while since the last releases and many issues have been > addressed, so here is the VOTE for CXF 3.6.3 and 3.5.8 > > Staging areas: > https://repository.apache.org/content/r

Re: Deprecate aegis databinding ?

Hi Jim, I am not aware of any project that uses Aegis data binding. I believe deprecating / removing it would make perfect sense. +1. Thank you! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 5:06 a.m. Jim Ma wrote: > Hi all, > I am not sure if it's the time to deprecate some old cxf th

Re: 4.1 Release?

Hi, Please check out the previously started discussion thread [1]. Thank you. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rggjhm3w4gr81y8dmskp4mc7cydq13zq Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, 3:44 a.m. Thomas Andraschko wrote: > Hi, > > we, from the Apache TomEE team, would like to m

Re: Release 4.0.5 / 3.6.4 / 3.5.9?

+1, thanks a lot Freeman! On Wed, Jul 10, 2024, 12:24 p.m. Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am gonna start the release process tomorrow if there are no other > objections. > > Cheers > Freeman > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 8:18 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > > > Thanks a lot Freeman! I will rearrang

Re: Release 4.0.5 / 3.6.4 / 3.5.9?

Hi Gary, We do not release milestones or beta / alpha / ... bits, please use snaphots as you do now (meanwhile the team is working towards 4.1.0 release). Thank you. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, 4:35 p.m. Gary D. Gregory wrote: > Hi All, > > How about a 4.1.0 milestone/

Re: Optional support for CDI integration ?

Hi guys, I have done some work trying to make CXF and CDI (Weld 2.x) working together and though I failed to make it work, I have got the approximate understanding how it might be implemented. >From my prospective, to get basic @Inject working won't be very hard. The one assumption I have is that

Re: Optional support for CDI integration ?

10/02/14 17:53, Andrey Redko wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I have done some work trying to make CXF and CDI (Weld 2.x) working >> together and though I failed to make it work, I have got the approximate >> understanding how it might be implemented. >> From my pr

Follow-up on CDI integration

Hey guys, Follow-up on a recent conversation, I am wondering if someone is looking into PoC for CDI integration in CXF? (Christian?) I would like to spend some time and try to come up with easy way to have basic CDI support in JAX-RS / JAX-WS services. Please let me know if someone is already wor

Re: Follow-up on CDI integration

, Andriy Redko On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi Andriy > > > On 18/02/14 22:44, Andrey Redko wrote: > >> >> Hey guys, >> >> Follow-up on a recent conversation, I am wondering if someone is looking >> into PoC for CDI integrati

Re: Couple more CXF 3.0 thoughts.....

Hi Dan, I would agree with guys on GSoC (don't have enough details). Definitely +1 to Java7 and +1 to stop with 2.6.x (unless some critical fixes, maybe). Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redk On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > With 3.0 getting really close, I do realiz

Re: Should we introduce 3.1.0 Trunk

Hi Sergey, Just some thoughts on that: if we have features for 3.1 already in work, it makes sense to introduce new branch for 3.1.x I might be wrong but it seems like 3.0.x is going to be a mainstream for a while and as such should stay a trunk. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] CXF XJC Utils 3.0.1 and buildutils 3.0.0

+1 Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release our xjc-utils 3.0.1 subproject and our build > utils as 3.0.0. > > Changes for xjc: > [CXFXJC-7] Make sure list types aren't instantiated. > Attempt to workaround JAXB-1026 via s

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

+1! Andriy On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > +1. > > Colm. > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Christian Schneider < > ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > > > +1 to both > > > > Christian > > > > On 08.10.2014 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > >> This is a vote to releas

Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF

Hi, Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB resource classes yet. The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the EJB container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can be used and is going to work as expected. Thanks. Best Re

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-6131]JAX-RS resource spring auto-discovery doesn't work in OSGi

Hi guys, Thanks a lot for adding OSGi support. One question though: I think we should hide the environment discovery (OSGi/non-OSGI) inside the ClasspathScanner class. ClasspathScanner, when instantiated, can figure out if it runs in OSGi and create the right classpath scanner delegate (so JAXRSSe

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.14/3.0.3

+1 Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.14 and 3.0.3. These versions fix a > bunch of bugs users have encountered. They also provide some additional > functionality to make it easier to configure various SSL/TL

Fwd: Hystrix feature?

Hi Sergey, What do you think about looking into this feature? I do have some knowledge about Hystrix and it has gained some traction in the community. I am not sure though what exactly this guy has in mind BUT if you don't mind, I can work with him to outline his design / intentions and make sure

Re: Fwd: Hystrix feature?

sooner than later > with Jersey. I'm not trying to extend the dev discussion here though - more > or less what I said there :-) > > Cheers, Sergey > > > On 24/02/15 12:30, Andrey Redko wrote: > >> Hi Sergey, >> >> What do you think about looking into

Re: Fwd: Hystrix feature?

y - I do expect that JAX-RS 2.1 Reactive extensions will have no any > direct relationship to Netflix, perhaps you'd choose to use ot internally, > I'm not sure right now > > Cheers, Sergey > On 24/02/15 13:31, Andrey Redko wrote: > >> Hi Sergey, >> >> Tha

Re: [VOTE] Apache DOSGi 1.7.0 Release

+1 Andriy On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > The Apache CXF DOSGi sub project implements the OSGi Remote Services and > Remote Services Admin Service specifications [1] which provide a > distributed computing model based around OSGi Services.

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.0.6 and 3.1.2

+1! Andriy On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release 3.0.6 and 3.1.2. We’ve fixed over 40 issues > for 3.1.2. > > Staging areas: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1049/ > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.1

+1 Andriy On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > +1 > > Christian > > On 06.08.2015 16:02, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.1. >> >> Maven artifacts (shared with 1.1.3): >> https://repository.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.1.3

+1 Andriy On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > +1 > > Christian > > On 06.08.2015 16:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.1.3. >> >> Maven artifacts (shared with 1.2.1): >> https://repository.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF XJC Utils 3.0.5

+1 Andriy On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF XJC Utils 3.0.5. This release just > fixes a couple of bugs I ran in to when porting Fediz to use the XJC DV > plugin instead of the generic jaxb plugin. > > Issues fixed: > > https://is

Re: [VOTE]Apache CXF 3.1.3

+1 Andriy On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > It’s been about 6 weeks since the 3.1.2 release and we’ve fixed a bunch of > things that some users have been asking for: > > Tag: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=commit;h=f3185100ec7caea0ac4b52108210ed7e68e

Re: Drop support for Jetty 8?

+1. Andriy On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > You may have seen a bunch of updates for 3.2 around getting the Jetty > support updated to allow for Jetty 9.3 (which requires Java 8, BTW). I > have all the tests passing with both Jetty 9.2 and Jetty 9.3 now which is a > goo

Re: Swagger2Feature missing APIs

Hi, I suspect the issue is caused by the fact that your resource classes are located in different packages. Swagger's BeanConfig class accepts the package name for resources to scan and by default it is taken from the configured service beans (the first one available). If this is the case, there a

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.2

+1 Andriy On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.2. There are a large number > of issues fixed in this release (19 JIRAs): > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FEDIZ/fixforversion/12333156 > > Release artifacts: > > htt

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Build Utils 3.2.0

+1 Andriy On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Build Utils 3.2.0. It just contains > some plugin updates. The reason behind the release is to avoid introducing > an old Apache Ant dependency to downstream projects, which has a securi

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.1.6/3.0.9

+1 Andriy On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > It’s been awhile since the last set of releases and we’ve fixed over 45 > JIRA’s (some of which may be needed for the Fediz release) so I’d like to > get this out. > > Staging areas: > 3.0.9: > https://repository.apache.org/conte

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.3.0

+1 Andriy On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.3.0. It's a new major release > with support for SAML SSO and OpenId Connect in the IdP, amongst other > features. > > Tag: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf-fe

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF DOSGi 1.8.0

+1 Andriy On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF DOSGi 1.8.0. > > The main change in this release to move out the core of Remote Service > Admin and the discovery support to the Apache Aries Remote Service Adm

Re: CXF Repository Build

Yes, indeed, I see that as well ... Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi All > > CXF Repository Build (on 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT master) is downloading > 3.2.0-SNAPSHOTS for all the modules, though the master has just been built > and the snapshot

Re: Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

Hey Sergey, Great idea I think, we may add even more features around Swagger, awesome timing for that. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi All > > as part of CXF-6760 [1] I've moved the Swagger code into its own > cxf-rt-rs-descri

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.3

+1 Andriy On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.3. > > Issues fixed: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FEDIZ/fixforversion/12334883 > > Maven artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-

Re: Removing some old modules in 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT

Hey Sergey, Great undertaking I think! From my side, I would put -1 to oauth module. You are right, technically it is old spec but it is still used widely (mostly because it is much simple to integrate comparing to oauth2 f.e.). Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:0

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF DOSGi 2.0.0

+1, awesome one Andriy On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF DOSGi 2.0.0. > > The main change in this version is to split the SOAP support from the REST > support. So it is now possible to only install SOAP

Re: Failing rs-sse system tests

Hi Sergey, Exactly, this is what I was looking at for last couple of weeks, Atm has a few hacks around Jetty, but seems like I run into uncovered flow. The annoying part is that tests do not fail on Windows box, it makes troubleshooting more complicated for me. But I will definitely do something

Re: Failing rs-sse system tests

but the same test fails if it is run second in the group of 2 tests. > I can def help with investigating on Linux - but we'd need to disable them > for now if you'd like me to look into it because I'll probably only have > time some time next week > > Thanks, Sergey > O

Re: cxi integration: multiple buses during deployment?

Hey guys, Indeed, there is an issue with CDI and usage of custom bus. I think there are couple of the options we have here: - pass the bus instance to ResourceUtils::createApplication, in this case if bus is not set, the behaviour would be exactly the same - change the way JAXRSServerFactoryBean

Re: cxi integration: multiple buses during deployment?

:00 Sergey Beryozkin : > > > Hi Andriy > > yes, option 1 is probably the simplest for the CDI integration path, > > > > Thanks, Sergey > > > > On 18/10/16 12:43, Andrey Redko wrote: > > > >> Hey guys, > >> > >> Indee

Re: cxi integration: multiple buses during deployment?

; deployments case. > > > Best Regards, > > Andriy Redko > > > > JDA> So still something isn't clicking as I don't have Romain's issue. > Is it > > JDA> specific to when you have multiple deployments in your JVM? > > > > JDA>

Re: cxi integration: multiple buses during deployment?

ress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >

Re: is a release early december possible?

Hey Romain, Although I cannot comment on release, sorry, I have made a few changes regarding CDI integration (DefaultApplication discovery, release of the creational contexts, handling resource classes properly). The last changes have been committed early last week. Could you please confirm no reg

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

That's right, the JAX-RS part should be supported by Brave already thanks to dedicated CXF integration (I was involved in late-stage discussions for the PR in question but not in the implementation). Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-s

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

I think it is very good idea to integrate brave-cxf into CXF. Christian, do you have enough time to work on that? I think I could help you out with that, I have reviewed brave-cxf PRs awhile back. Thanks. On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > I just talked to Adrian Cole.

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

and get a working > service. The CXF tracing could then simply inject the Brave service instead > of taking care of the Brave setup directly. > > Christian > > > 2016-12-07 15:50 GMT+01:00 Andrey Redko : > > > I think it is very good idea to integrate brave-cxf into CXF.

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

Right, it looks like really light version of tracing, which essentially allows to figure out which service/host is the problem. I am not sure how useful it could be in practice, and there is a large overlap with logging in this case. On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 20

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

>> >> >> I suppose adding few basic interceptors to rt/management can work >>> >>> >> Yes, >> >> only trick is to support @Suspended case, see >> https://gist.github.com/rmannibucau/8c48d4182388b228046586fd6785a2f2 >> >> &

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

-Bucau wrote: > 2016-12-08 19:35 GMT+01:00 Andrey Redko : > > > That's right, Sergey, we have done some work around span manipulation in > > case of async calls. The brave-cxf supports that as well but in any case > > things may get a bit more complicated. I agree with yo

Re: CXF 3.2 support jetty9 only (drop jetty8 support)

+1 to this idea, haven't seen Jetty 8 in while in many projects, Jetty 9 would be a way to go I think Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Team, > > We have several issues(like CXF-7160 and CXF-7179) recently which is > caused by

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.1.10

+1 Andriy On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote for Apache CXF 3.1.10. We’ve fixed a bunch of issues and > I’d like to get it out so we can start trying to concentrate on getting 3.2 > out. > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori

Re: Remove obsolete RxJava code and keep RxJava2 only one

Hey Sergey, I think the "ideal" in this case depends on whom to ask. For us - yet another module to support, for users - out of the box integration. With new module we could collect a bit more insights if people use it or not. No use - drop in next releases. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.2

+1! Andriy On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 3.2.2. We’ve fixed over 60 JIRA issues, > definitely time to release it. This also includes releases of build-utils > (3.4.0) and xjc-utils (3.2.1) to allow it to build on Java 9 and with the > lat

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF 3.1.15

+1 Andriy On Mar 8, 2018 9:20 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF 3.1.15. > > Issued fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CXF/versions/ > 12342151 > > Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1113/ > > Git tag: ht

Re: SSE support and regular endpoints

Hi Carlos, That's right, SSE in CXF requires dedicated transport, however it is fully compatible with the existing HTTP transport (regular endpoints). Both SSE and non-SSE endpoints should work just fine. Here is a link to the wiki, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.3.4

+1, thank you Dan for quick resolution Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 5:18 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.2.4. We only fixed a few issues since > 3.2.3, but it fixes a severe regression for Syncope as well as fixes a > potential corruption issu

Re: A few 'Feature' questions

Yeah, certainly, would be good to get a bit more details or small code snippets to understand the problem. Mark, is it possible? Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 12:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys > > Think CXF should support that case or support its own fe

Re: Builds on Jenkins

Thanks a lot, John. On it. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Sat, May 5, 2018, 10:02 AM John D. Ament wrote: > Andriy, > > You now have access to configure the jobs. > > I've reconfigured the JDK18 job to show timestamps. I also changed the > time out strategy from absolute to no activity. St

Re: Release cxf-xjc-plugin so that it works with Java 10?

Hi Freeman, Thanks a lot for sharing the post, will go through it shortly. Hope to have something out this week so we could discuss it. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:03 AM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Andriy, > > Thanks for your work. > > I just believe the most i

Re: Change master to 3.3?

Big +1, same question as Colm has, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 9:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > +1. Would master stay on Java 8 or move up to Java 10? > > Colm. > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > > I’m thinking of creating the

Re: Change master to 3.3?

Hi Andy, I think we certainly should be thinking towards jdk11 but start with jdk10 and win some time. We know what is coming, JAXB and SOAP are our main pain points, we could import these dependencies directly from get-go and be quite ready for jdk11. Thoughts? Best Regards, Andriy Redko On

Re: Change master to 3.3?

Thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 7:45 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > Master is now 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT…..Feel free to start pushing anything > there. > > I’ve setup the 3.2.x-fixes branch. I still need to get Jenkins builds > setup for it. > > Dan > > > On Jun 26, 2018

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

I will take a look, may be we could submit the PR for it. ServiceMix guys are very responsive. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 9:54 AM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > On 2018/07/27 11:28:33, Andriy Redko wrote: > > 2.2.11 > > > > Let us try to upgrade to 2.3.0? :-) > > Looks

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.6

+1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 7:15 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 3.2.6. > > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1120/ < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1

Re: Failing tracing systests on master

Hey Colm, Yes, I will take a look tonight, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 7:01 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi all, > > Following some of the recent upgrades the tracing systests are failing on > master for me: > > [ERROR] Failures: > [ERROR] > > BraveTracingTe

Re: What about adding WebClient#patch ?

It is good question actually, the JAXRS 2.1 API (SyncInvoker) does not have patch() either, I think we could add one to WebClient, won't harm. Not sure about USE_ASYNC though, we may have to keep it for backward compatiblity, no? Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 10:08 AM Fra

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: update some dependencies

Thanks Dennis, I will try to take a look on OpenApi ones, getting 3.2.x build back on track now. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 11:41 AM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > Ops, sorry had multiple other unrelated test failures that's why I haven't > recognized it. Will fix

Re: Unstable tracing systests...

Hey Dan, We could try to add a shirt delay (to let spans flush) or trigger flush forceably (if it is feasible). Colm also reported a few tests are failing for him a while back. I will make it my priority to stabilize them. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 2:33 PM Dani

Re: Unstable tracing systests...

Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 3:46 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > On Aug 29, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Andrey Redko wrote: > > > > Hey Dan, > > > > We could try to add a shirt delay (to let spans flush) or trigger flush > > forceably (if it is fea

Re: Questions on CXF OpenAPI

Hey Irfan, So yeah, you cannot use attachments like this, it should be hidden behind binary payload. The only thing you need to do is to change type="file" to type="string" in your @Schema. This is the OAS 3.0 approach: https://swagger.io/docs/specification/describing-request-body/file-upload/ An

Re: Questions on CXF OpenAPI

t see any option to upload. I only see a > text area instead of uploading option. Is that the way it should be ? > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:12 AM Andrey Redko wrote: > >> Hey Irfan, >> >> So yeah, you cannot use attachments like this, it should be hidden behind >&g

Re: Adding resourcePackages in OpenAPICustomizer

Hey Irfan, Looks like you are doing everything right, would you mind please to open an issue and attach the sample project to it (so we can reproduce)? Thank you. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 7:36 AM Irfan Pasha wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > All my JAX-RS annotations and serv

***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Adding resourcePackages in OpenAPICustomizer

rey, will do. > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:17 AM Andrey Redko wrote: > > > >> Hey Irfan, > >> > >> Looks like you are doing everything right, would you mind please to open > >> an issue and attach the sample project to it (so we c

Re: Fixing JDK10 (and probably JDK9) builds for master

Hi Freeman, Absolutely, it should be released next week, I will configure the job. For 3.7-SNAPSHOT, we need to find the way to fetch it, it's not available in repos accessible to Jenkins. Have we solved such a problem before? PS: JDK9 is rolling as well. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko

Re: Fixing JDK10 (and probably JDK9) builds for master

Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > On Sep 22, 2018, at 6:58 AM, Andrey Redko wrote: > > Hi Freeman, > > Absolutely, it should be released next week, I will configure the job. For > 3.7-SNAPSHOT, we need to find the way to fetch it, it's not

Re:

Hey Irfan, Freeman committed the fix on the master and 3.2.x, could you please give it a try? (with 3.2.7-SNAPSHOT). Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Sep 27, 2018, 11:12 AM Irfan Pasha wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > Any thoughts on this issue ? > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:58 AM Irfan

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF 3.1.17

+1, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 8:46 AM Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 > > Thanks! > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > > On Sep 30, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > wrote: > > > > This is a vote to

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.4.5

+1, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 5:25 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.4.5. > > Git tag: https://github.com/apache/cxf-fediz/tree/fediz-1.4.5 > > Issues fixed: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p

  1   2   >