Re: Discuss: Layer changes - 3.7.0 or 4.0.0 ?

2024-03-25 Thread Mike Beckerle
be added to enhance the VS debugger extension? > Larry > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Beckerle > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 11:22 AM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: Re: Discuss: Layer changes - 3.7.0 or 4.0.0 ? > > I think the compelling argumen

RE: Discuss: Layer changes - 3.7.0 or 4.0.0 ?

2024-03-25 Thread Larry Barber
Mike, Are there any changes to support debugging the new layers stuff? Something that could/should be added to enhance the VS debugger extension? Larry -Original Message- From: Mike Beckerle Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 11:22 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: Discuss: Layer

RE: Discuss: Layer changes - 3.7.0 or 4.0.0 ?

2024-03-18 Thread Sood, Harinder
ect: EXT: Re: Discuss: Layer changes - 3.7.0 or 4.0.0 ? I don't think we should make our next release 4.0.0. There's a handful of changes that have been discussed that probably require a major version bump (e.g. drop Java 8 support, bump to Scala 2.13, merge sapi and japi into api, change director

Re: Discuss: Layer changes - 3.7.0 or 4.0.0 ?

2024-03-18 Thread Mike Beckerle
I think the compelling argument to get the layers stuff into 3.7.0 is that we don't want any more layers built using 3.6.0-and-prior APIs. I tend to agree we should not make the next release 4.0.0 because we have other things to get into that release, and the layers stuff is not an official part

Re: Discuss: Layer changes - 3.7.0 or 4.0.0 ?

2024-03-18 Thread Steve Lawrence
I don't think we should make our next release 4.0.0. There's a handful of changes that have been discussed that probably require a major version bump (e.g. drop Java 8 support, bump to Scala 2.13, merge sapi and japi into api, change directory structures/jar names, remove deprecated