subject:"Re\: OpenJDK Security Group Q\&A"

Re: OpenJDK Security Group Q

2016-09-22 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny

Le 22/09/16 à 16:56, Steve Moyer a écrit : > All, > > During the birds-of-a-feather session titled "OpenJDK Security Group: > Discussion and Q" on Tuesday night, there were relatively detailed > discussions of what changes (plus and minus) might be made in OpenJDK 9 and > 10. Once the module

Re: OpenJDK Security Group Q

2016-09-22 Thread Shawn McKinney

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Steve Moyer wrote: > > So ... what other categories of classes would be useful? The Apache > Directory project obviously maintains code that performs the same functions - > wouldn't it be nice if the JDK itself took over some of the low-level >