Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NFP PF support based on new CPP interface

2018-04-09 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 4/6/2018 3:44 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 4/5/2018 3:42 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > >> NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initialization. > >> Current NFP PMD PF support was added based on the NSPU interface. This >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NFP PF support based on new CPP interface

2018-04-06 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 4/6/2018 3:44 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 4/5/2018 3:42 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: >> NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initialization. >> Current NFP PMD PF support was added based on the NSPU interface. This >> implies to do initialization through the NSP, a embedded ARM

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NFP PF support based on new CPP interface

2018-04-06 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 4/5/2018 3:42 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initialization. > Current NFP PMD PF support was added based on the NSPU interface. This > implies to do initialization through the NSP, a embedded ARM processor > which does initialization tasks o

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NFP PF support based on new CPP interface

2018-04-05 Thread Alejandro Lucero
I did not create the patchset with the -v flag so just the first one has the v2 tag. I will remove the patches and send them again. Apologies. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Alejandro Lucero < alejandro.luc...@netronome.com> wrote: > NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initi