It looks like https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5654 is the last to
backport.
Shall we do a release candidate after that?
This will probably end up being a non-Apache release when all is said and
done, since the timelines will probably not line up - we want to get the
bug fixes out quickly,
I backported 5504 and 5587. I skipped 5374 since it turns out it isn't
relevant to 0.12.0 -- it fixes something introduced since then -- so I
moved that back to 0.13.0.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
> I raised backport PRs for everything on my list except
for https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5587
we deployed the changes in production manually for this and it works fine.
Prashant
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
> I raised backport PRs for everything on my list except for these three,
> since they had
I raised backport PRs for everything on my list except for these three,
since they had some (minor) conflicts and I was using a backport script
that bails out if it sees any conflicts:
- https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5504
- https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5587
-
also for the list:
- compact task throws exception #5611
i dont have permission to add to gian's github milestone
Prashant
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
> Here we go: https://github.com/druid-io/druid/milestone/26. Please add
> stuff if it makes
Here we go: https://github.com/druid-io/druid/milestone/26. Please add
stuff if it makes sense (high importance / low risk bug fixes).
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
> It looks like there's a lot of support for doing a 0.12.1… I'll make a
> milestone
It looks like there's a lot of support for doing a 0.12.1… I'll make a
milestone in GH.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Slim Bouguerra wrote:
> +1 especially there is some instability bugs.
>
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Gian Merlino wrote:
>
> My feeling
+1 especially there is some instability bugs.
On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Gian Merlino wrote:
My feeling is that #3 and #2 are borderline, but #1 definitely warrants a
new release. Personally I have seen it occur at least a half dozen times,
and I had been thinking about
+1 on doing a 0.12.1 release.
Kerberos security also has some issues -
https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5596
I propose we also get this in 0.12.1.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 00:32 Prashant Deva wrote:
> May I also add this to the list Gian proposed:
>
> - Load rules
May I also add this to the list Gian proposed:
- Load rules should honor partial overlap #5595
Prashant
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Gian Merlino wrote:
> My feeling is that #3 and #2 are borderline, but #1 definitely warrants a
> new release. Personally I have seen it
My feeling is that #3 and #2 are borderline, but #1 definitely warrants a
new release. Personally I have seen it occur at least a half dozen times,
and I had been thinking about proposing a Druid 0.12.1 release, so I'm glad
you brought it up.
If we do 0.12.1, it would be another non-ASF release
I think this conversation is worth having. I have cross posted this to
dev@druid.apache.org and will reply there. Since we're trying to migrate
the dev list, please cross post any dev messages there, or even only post
to that list.
Gian
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Prashant Deva
12 matches
Mail list logo