[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15571024#comment-15571024
]
Cazen Lee commented on EDGENT-268:
--
When I insert a License header at first time, I was working with reference to
the [Apache Aurora|https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/build.gradle].
However, I find that the most of the project using the [2] header when I try to
search again.
But, same as Justin's opnion and following to the document that you mentioned,
The purpose of [1] is intended to grant the Copyright and the Apache Licence to
work that has been already created outside the ASF(APPLY THE APACHE LICENSE TO
YOUR WORK)
I think that [2] is looks good on the work of the ASF(HEADERS FOR CODE
DEVELOPED AT THE ASF).
> Change licensing header in gradle files
> ---
>
> Key: EDGENT-268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268
> Project: Edgent
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Miscellaneous
>Reporter: Dale LaBossiere
>
> The gradle files have ASF license headers but they are of the form specified
> in [1]. The rest of the source files (java, shell) use the form specified in
> [2].
> Are the gradle files OK or do they need to be changed to use [2]?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> From Justin: I would go with [2].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)