RE: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Yishay Weiss
+1 From: Alex Harui Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 9:28 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex Hi folks, Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal below to the board.

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-09-01 Thread lizhi
D:\proj\git\spriteflexjs\test>D:\sdk\flexjs9/js/bin/mxmlc -targets=JSFlex -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions -remove-circulars -external-library-path="D:\sdk\flexjs9\js\libs\js.swc" -compiler.source-path=../src src\TestHungryHeroGPU.as -define=CONFIG::as_only,false

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-09-01 Thread lizhi
I just downloaded the latest version of flexjs, setTimeout's bug, but my spriteflexjs project was still wrong. I really don't know how to test this bug, so can you go to GitHub and download my project?. Then compile it It's easy for you to compile a flexjs project as a SDK developer. I really

RE: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 binding On Sep 1, 2017 8:59 AM, "Chris Martin" wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Chris > > From: Alex Harui > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:28 PM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Jeffry Houser
+0 On 9/1/2017 11:36 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: +1 On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote: Hi folks, Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal below to the board. Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want, any

RE: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Chris Martin
+1 (binding) Chris From: Alex Harui Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:28 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex Hi folks, Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal below

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Peter Ent
+1 (Binding) Peter Ent Adobe Systems On 9/1/17, 6:08 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >-1 (Binding) > >As I mentioned, I cannot support this proposal as is as I was excluded >from the PMC of the Fork. > >Chris > >On 2017-09-01 08:28, Alex Harui wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Josh Tynjala
+1 - Josh On Aug 31, 2017 11:28 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Hi folks, > > Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal > below to the board. Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want, > any number in-between per [1]. Only PMC member

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-09-01 Thread Alex Harui
Lizhi, I'm sorry, but I just don't want to take the time to wade through dozens of files. If you grep your source code, where is setTimeout mentioned? In the small test case, flash.utils.setTimeout gets compiled into setTimeout.js, but it doesn't appear to be doing so in this output. -Alex

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Michael Schmalle
+1 On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi folks, > > Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal > below to the board. Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want, > any number in-between per [1]. Only PMC member

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
+1 binding Fred. Sent from Samsung tablet. Original message From: Alex Harui Date: 01/09/2017 07:28 (GMT+00:00) To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex Hi folks, Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to

[FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-01 Thread Greg Dove
Hi Alex, Nice to see this stuff progressing within the framework itself. I moved this comment to dev because of content below, and I will try to take a look at this, to see if I can also test things in the coming week. I quickly looked at some of the commits, perhaps I have missed something and

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Harbs
+1 Harbs > On Sep 1, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal > below to the board. Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want, > any number in-between per [1]. Only PMC

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
+1 On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, 09:00 Harbs wrote: > +1 > > Harbs > > > On Sep 1, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal > > below to the board. Please use

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Erik de Bruin
+1 EdB On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi folks, > > Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal > below to the board. Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want, > any number in-between per [1]. Only PMC

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-09-01 Thread Alex Harui
Are you sure you have the latest code? Maybe you grabbed an old build before the new build finished. However, I noticed this error (GoogDepsWriter line 158) is different from the other error you reported (line 100) so there might be more than one bug. -Alex On 8/31/17, 11:22 PM, "lizhi"

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Olaf Krueger
+1 Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

RE: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
+1 (binding) -Mark K -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 2:28 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex Hi folks, Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 binding as there are still outstanding questions in the discussion thread and the committer/PMC lists have not been amended. While I’m not against a FlexJS becoming it’s own project seperate from the Flex SDK and there’s probably good reasons from a marketing point of view there seem's

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Christofer Dutz
-1 (Binding) As I mentioned, I cannot support this proposal as is as I was excluded from the PMC of the Fork. Chris On 2017-09-01 08:28, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi folks, > > Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal > below to the board.

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-09-01 Thread lizhi
the same. D:\proj\git\spriteflexjs\test>D:\sdk\flexjs9_new/js/bin/mxmlc -targets=JSFlex -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions -remove-circulars -external-library-path="D:\sdk\flexjs9_new\js\libs\js.swc" -compiler.source-path=../src src\TestBug.as -define=CONFIG::as_only,false

[VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Alex Harui
Hi folks, Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal below to the board. Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want, any number in-between per [1]. Only PMC member votes will be used to determine the results, but we are more than happy to hear from non-PMC