+1 for the proposal.
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 12:43 PM Dian Fu wrote:
> Hi Dawid,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Counting all the votes from non apache addresses as
> non-binding makes sense. Just as Jark mentioned, we can always remind the
> committer/PMC to vote again to use the apache
Hi Dawid,
Thanks for the reply. Counting all the votes from non apache addresses as
non-binding makes sense. Just as Jark mentioned, we can always remind the
committer/PMC to vote again to use the apache address if necessary (i.e. when
the number of binding votes is not enough).
Thanks,
Dian
+1 (from my apache email ;-))
Best,
Kurt
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:22 PM Jark Wu wrote:
> I'm +1 on this proposal.
>
> Regarding to the case that Dian mentioned, we can reminder the
> committer/PMC to vote again use the apache email,
> and of course the non-apache vote is counted as non-binding
I'm +1 on this proposal.
Regarding to the case that Dian mentioned, we can reminder the
committer/PMC to vote again use the apache email,
and of course the non-apache vote is counted as non-binding.
Best,
Jark
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 17:33, Dawid Wysakowicz
wrote:
> Hi Dian,
>
> I don't want to
Hi Dian,
I don't want to be very strict, but I think it should be counted as
non-binding, if it comes from non apache address, yes.
Anybody should be able to verify a vote. Moreover I think this the only
way to "encourage" all committers to use their apache addresses ;)
Best,
Dawid
On 04/12/20
Thanks for your explanation Dawid! It makes sense to me now. +1.
Just one minor question: Does this mean that if a committer/PMC accidentally
votes using the non apache email, even if the person who summarizes the votes
clearly KNOWS who he/she is, that vote will still be counted as non-binding?
Very sensible! +1
> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>
> I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1.
>
> On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me first
>> clarify two things
I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1.
On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me
first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial
suggestion.
1. I do not want to count all votes fr
Hi Dawid,
Thanks for you explanation.
You mean that "people who vote for binding +1 need to use apache email
addresses".
Although I can't vote binding +1, I am +1 for this suggestion.
Best,
Jingsong Lee
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 4:04 PM Dawid Wysakowicz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry I think I was no
Hi all,
Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me first
clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial suggestion.
1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as binding
2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org
Thanks Dawid for start this discussion.
I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according to the
bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC members are
binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't help here. Even
if a vote is from a F
Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion.
+1 to Xuefu's viewpoint.
I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to
send email.
Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding".
Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket.
In this way, we can let
Hi Dawid,
Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you
described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email
address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly
applies to me.
It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves
Hi,
I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think
whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate
or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address.
It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if
we do not work
14 matches
Mail list logo
