Hi all,
Quick update on progress:
There is still ongoing work on adding state TTL for remote functions
(FLINK-17875), but the PR is expected to be mergeable over the next day or
two.
Therefore the feature branch cut will be slightly delayed. I'll announce
the cut in a separate email once it happe
Nice work, thanks for pushing this, Gordon!
+1 also from my side for a quick release.
I think it already warrants a release to have the 1.10.1 upgrade and the
fix to not fail on savepoints that are triggered concurrently to a
checkpoint.
Even nicer that there are two cool new features included.
Thanks for the positive feedback so far.
Lets then set the feature freeze date for Stateful Functions 2.1.0 to be
next Wednesday (May 27th).
We've made good progress over the past days, all mentioned features merged
besides the following:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17875 State
faster iteration definitely helps early-stage projects.
+1
Best,
Yuan
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:14 PM Congxian Qiu wrote:
> +1 from my side to have smaller and more frequent feature releases for the
> project in its early phases.
>
> Best,
> Congxian
>
>
> Marta Paes Moreira 于2020年5月21日周四 下午
+1 from my side to have smaller and more frequent feature releases for the
project in its early phases.
Best,
Congxian
Marta Paes Moreira 于2020年5月21日周四 下午12:49写道：
> +1 for more frequent releases with a shorter (but feedback-informed)
> feature set.
>
> Thanks, Gordon (and Igal)!
>
> Marta
>
>
+1 for more frequent releases with a shorter (but feedback-informed)
feature set.
Thanks, Gordon (and Igal)!
Marta
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 03:44, Yu Li wrote:
> +1, it makes a lot of sense for stateful functions to evolve faster.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 23:36, Zhijia
+1, it makes a lot of sense for stateful functions to evolve faster.
Best Regards,
Yu
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 23:36, Zhijiang
wrote:
> I also like this idea, considering stateful functions flexible enough to
> have a faster release cycle. +1 from my side.
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
>
I also like this idea, considering stateful functions flexible enough to have a
faster release cycle. +1 from my side.
Best,
Zhijiang
--
From:Seth Wiesman
Send Time:2020年5月20日(星期三) 21:45
To:dev
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Sta
+1 for a fast release cycle
Seth
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:43 AM Robert Metzger wrote:
> I like the idea of releasing Statefun more frequently to have faster
> feedback cycles!
>
> No objections for releasing 2.1.0 from my side.
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:22 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> wrote:
I like the idea of releasing Statefun more frequently to have faster
feedback cycles!
No objections for releasing 2.1.0 from my side.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:22 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Since Stateful Functions 2.0 was released early April,
> we've been getting some good f
10 matches
Mail list logo
