Re: November 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-11-13 Thread Robert Houghton
Yes, it's my first task this morning On Nov 13, 2018 07:02, "Anthony Baker" wrote: Are you able to send out a draft for review today? > On Nov 7, 2018, at 12:43 PM, Robert Houghton wrote: > > I volunteer as tribute > > On Nov 7, 2018 12:42, "Anthony Baker" wrote: > > We need to prepare a

Re: Develop Compilation Failure

2018-11-13 Thread Juan José Ramos
Hey Jens, No worries at all, it's fixed now. Cheers. On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:33 PM Jens Deppe wrote: > No worries, and thanks for the heads-up Juan. > > I'm really not sure anything can be done that wouldn't end up being > heavy-handed and mostly just be an impedance. > > I should have sent

Re: Questions about Poms and Publishing

2018-11-13 Thread Bill Burcham
@Patrick Rhomberg I've never seen the dependencyManagement element survive in a published POM before. Since it sounds like you're asserting that you saw that element in a published POM (published by Gradle), I decided to verify that. I ran this from the Geode develop branch just now: ./gradlew

Re: Develop Compilation Failure

2018-11-13 Thread Jens Deppe
No worries, and thanks for the heads-up Juan. I'm really not sure anything can be done that wouldn't end up being heavy-handed and mostly just be an impedance. I should have sent out a notice describing the commons-lang change (given its scope) and that any in-flight PRs might be affected.

Re: November 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-11-13 Thread Anthony Baker
Are you able to send out a draft for review today? > On Nov 7, 2018, at 12:43 PM, Robert Houghton wrote: > > I volunteer as tribute > > On Nov 7, 2018 12:42, "Anthony Baker" wrote: > > We need to prepare a report for the ASF Board by Nov 14. Any volunteers to > write up a draft? > > You

Develop Compilation Failure

2018-11-13 Thread Ju@N
Hello devs, Compilation in *develop* is failing after my latest commit. Long story short: the *concourse-ci* tests were all green but the *commons-lang* version was upgraded in develop *AFTER* the build finished but *BEFORE* the merge was executed, so the import is currently outdated (should be

Re: Geode 1.8 release pipeline

2018-11-13 Thread Alexander Murmann
Thank you, Owen! On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:08 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > Pipeline is up: > https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/apache-release-1-8-0-main > < > https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/apache-release-1-8-0-main > > > > > On Nov 12, 2018, at

Re: Is concourse down?

2018-11-13 Thread Patrick Rhomberg
@Everyone After some investigation with Kirk, it appears that the newer Concourse PR resource prioritizes commit time as part of its identification of "newer" commits on a given PR's branch. As a result, you can accidentally paint yourself into a corner with git rebase if your (actually newer)

Re: Is concourse down?

2018-11-13 Thread Kirk Lund
Patrick helped me figure this out! Whew, whatta relief. I'll let him describe it so others benefit (it has something to do with commit time instead of push time or changes to head sha)... Thanks, Kirk On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > Just in case you don't believe me and

Re: [DISCUSS] Disable merge for failing pull requests

2018-11-13 Thread Ryan McMahon
+1 I like this idea, but I recognize that it will be a challenge when there is still some flakiness to the pipeline. I think we'd need clear guidelines on what to do if your PR fails due to something seemingly unrelated. For instance, we ran into GEODE-5943 (flaky EvictionDUnitTest) in our last

Re: A small proposal: Not Sorting in AnalyzeSerializablesJUnitTest

2018-11-13 Thread Kirk Lund
+1 I've had to reorder the list a few times myself to correct the ordering On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Galen O'Sullivan wrote: > Hi all, > > I wrote a PR (GEODE-5800) recently to remove redundant cases from > DataSerializer.readObject etc. calls. This changed the bytecode size (but > not

Re: November 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-11-13 Thread Anthony Baker
Thanks Robert, comments below. > On Nov 13, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Robert Houghton wrote: > > Here is a draft of the GEODE report. Please comment or amend so that we can > submit to Apache. > Thank you, > -Robert Houghton > > ## Description: > Apache Geode provides a database-like consistency

Re: November 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-11-13 Thread Robert Houghton
Here is a draft of the GEODE report. Please comment or amend so that we can submit to Apache. Thank you, -Robert Houghton ## Description: Apache Geode provides a database-like consistency model, reliable transaction processing and a shared-nothing architecture to maintain very low latency

Re: Questions about Poms and Publishing

2018-11-13 Thread John Blum
If you'd like Maven dependencyManagement like behavior in Gradle, then you should have a look at... https://github.com/spring-gradle-plugins/dependency-management-plugin -j On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Bill Burcham wrote: > @Patrick Rhomberg I've never seen the > dependencyManagement

Re: Is concourse down?

2018-11-13 Thread Kirk Lund
Just in case you don't believe me and want to double-check my answer: My PR which says there are NO CONFLICTS: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/2778 Thanks, Kirk On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > Yes github says it merges cleanly (still does in fact): > > This branch has

Re: Is concourse down?

2018-11-13 Thread Kirk Lund
Yes github says it merges cleanly (still does in fact): This branch has no conflicts with the base branch when rebasingRebase and merge can be performed automatically. The previous revision DID have a merge conflict which is exactly why I rebased on develop, resolved conflicts and then pushed to

Re: A small proposal: Not Sorting in AnalyzeSerializablesJUnitTest

2018-11-13 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
If it makes easy to find/address failure with AnalyzeSerializablesTest, +1 -Anil. On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:34 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 I've had to reorder the list a few times myself to correct the ordering > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Galen O'Sullivan > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > >

Re: A small proposal: Not Sorting in AnalyzeSerializablesJUnitTest

2018-11-13 Thread Patrick Rhomberg
I categorically like style improvement and enforcement. +1 to this specific style improvement and enforcement. It's pretty straight-forward to write a regex into our spotless.gradle. Let me know if you need a hand on that front, since I know I shouldn't use "straightforward" to refer to either