Re: Using partition resolver via gfsh command vs XML config

The release branch for 1.3 was cut before the date mentioned by Jinmei, so the fix has not been released yet. Can you please try again against a build on develop? We hope to have a RC of 1.4 out soon. On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:23 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > According to the context

Re: Using partition resolver via gfsh command vs XML config

According to the context of where that message is used, the specified className is blank. private static Class forName(String className, String neededFor) { if (StringUtils.isBlank(className)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(CliStrings

Using partition resolver via gfsh command vs XML config

Hi all, I'm curious why I'd be running into issues using the gfsh command to create a region using a partition resolver, yet can do so using XML configuration. I've tried a couple of different combinations. I have a partition resolver class that is packaged in a JAR file. I tried the following: