[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 603843

2007-12-13 Thread prasad
Geronimo Revision: 603843 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071213/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071213 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3703) should allow custom SSL context for AsyncHttpClient

2007-12-13 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551451 ] Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-3703: I think using a default context is probably a good idea. Most

[BUILD] 2.1: Failed for Revision: 603850

2007-12-13 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 603843 Geronimo Revision: 603850 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071213/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071213 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3638) should allow URL encoding with custom encoding charset other than the default

2007-12-13 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551464 ] Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-3638: I'm not sure I understand the rationale for using US-ASCII as

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3703) should allow custom SSL context for AsyncHttpClient

2007-12-13 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-3703. Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 603885. I've committed this patch, but there's

Re: structure of GShell commands

2007-12-13 Thread Matt Hogstrom
If GShell would be targeted at more servers than G then I think these commands should be under geronimo. If not, then I think a flat structure makes sense. On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: We currently have the following structure for Geronimo GShell commands:

Monitoring console deadlock

2007-12-13 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
I was running monitoring console on G(portoffset=10) and the agent on default G instance. I saw this trace on the screen at a later time. So I can not describe what exactly I was doing.. This can probably be fixed by ordering the sql operations correctly. Thanks Anita 14:48:27,968 ERROR

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3704) Convert the activation and javamail dependencies to non-snapshot versions.

2007-12-13 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-3704. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 603928. Convert the activation and javamail

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3704) Convert the activation and javamail dependencies to non-snapshot versions.

2007-12-13 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
Convert the activation and javamail dependencies to non-snapshot versions. -- Key: GERONIMO-3704 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3704 Project: Geronimo

[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 603911

2007-12-13 Thread prasad
Geronimo Revision: 603911 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071213/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071213 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO

[BUILD] 2.1: Failed for Revision: 603921

2007-12-13 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 603914 Geronimo Revision: 603921 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071213/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071213 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL

Re: Do Plugins need Prerequisites?

2007-12-13 Thread Aaron Mulder
On Dec 12, 2007 8:27 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I must be missing something... how does the prerequisite system work better than dependencies here? I'm not 100% sure of what currently happens when you try to install a plugin that has an unavailable dependency, but it certainly

Re: Do Plugins need Prerequisites?

2007-12-13 Thread Paul McMahan
Thanks Aaron for the thorough explanation. I agree that the prereq relationship provides useful information and functionality beyond what the dependency relationship provides. The plugins portlet in the admin console will currently inspect the prerequisites for the plugins listed in a

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3703) should allow custom SSL context for AsyncHttpClient

2007-12-13 Thread Sangjin Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551589 ] Sangjin Lee commented on GERONIMO-3703: --- It should be OK, because sessions are reused for the specific host

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3703) should allow custom SSL context for AsyncHttpClient

2007-12-13 Thread Sangjin Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3703: -- Attachment: test.patch added a unit test that tests connection reuse with SSL sockets

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3638) should allow URL encoding with custom encoding charset other than the default

2007-12-13 Thread Sangjin Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551592 ] Sangjin Lee commented on GERONIMO-3638: --- Yes, I agree the default for URL encoding should be UTF-8. I also

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3638) should allow URL encoding with custom encoding charset other than the default

2007-12-13 Thread Sangjin Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3638: -- Attachment: (was: 3638.patch) should allow URL encoding with custom encoding charset

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3638) should allow URL encoding with custom encoding charset other than the default

2007-12-13 Thread Sangjin Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3638: -- Attachment: 3638.patch a revised patch should allow URL encoding with custom encoding

A few Questions

2007-12-13 Thread Manu George
Hi, I am trying to add a few custom entries into the app specific JNDI space. Is it possible to get a handle to the componentContext during the deployment of a J2EE app so that it can be modified. It becomes immutable after the application starts as per the spec so i need to do it during

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3703) should allow custom SSL context for AsyncHttpClient

2007-12-13 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551600 ] Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-3703: Good test to add. Thanks! Committed revision 604016. should

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3638) should allow URL encoding with custom encoding charset other than the default

2007-12-13 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-3638. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Rick McGuire Committed revision 604018. This last

Re: Our 2.1 assemblies are nearly 2x the size of 2.0.2

2007-12-13 Thread Joe Bohn
Joe Bohn wrote: It looks like the size of our images is increasing dramatically (nearly 2x). For example, the geronimo-jetty6-minimal snapshots have been growing like this (these image sizes are from the snapshot repo): 16604006 Jul 26 18:54

[jira] Assigned: (GSHELL-20) `set foo=bar` does not work as expected

2007-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Dillon reassigned GSHELL-20: -- Assignee: Jason Dillon (was: Jason Warner) `set foo=bar` does not work as expected

[jira] Updated: (GSHELL-20) `set foo=bar` does not work as expected

2007-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Dillon updated GSHELL-20: --- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.0.1) 1.0-alpha-1 Fix Version/s:

[jira] Closed: (GSHELL-20) `set foo=bar` does not work as expected

2007-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-20. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks :-) `set foo=bar` does not work as expected

Re: Do Plugins need Prerequisites?

2007-12-13 Thread David Jencks
OK, so I agree the prereq feature is useful so I'll stop trying to remove it :-) However I ***really*** don't think it should be used for assuring the correct web server. I want to being install a plugin such as the web console and have it install the web server as a dependency. To me

Fewer gbean proxies on the horizon

2007-12-13 Thread David Jencks
A really long time ago Dain made the server work without gbean proxies in gbean references, but we didn't enable this by default because it broke the admin console. While waiting for a build I had a look and think I've fixed the admin console it still seems to work. I expect to

Re: Do Plugins need Prerequisites?

2007-12-13 Thread Aaron Mulder
I will just conclude by saying it's not my feeling that we currently have the best possible solution -- I just want to make sure things don't move backward. It would be possible to provide special handling for Tomcat/Jetty at the level of JVM versions and take that issue out of the picture. It

Re: Fewer gbean proxies on the horizon

2007-12-13 Thread Aaron Mulder
Wow! Either you're pretty sharp or you really need a faster machine! :) I think the main issue was that the console expected to be able to cast GBean references to some helper interface in order to start and stop individual GBeans and get a GBean's name and things like that. And the proxies

Re: Fewer gbean proxies on the horizon

2007-12-13 Thread David Jencks
On Dec 13, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Wow! Either you're pretty sharp or you really need a faster machine! :) or the solution was really simple :-) I think the main issue was that the console expected to be able to cast GBean references to some helper interface in order to

Re: [VOTE] Release Genesis 1.3

2007-12-13 Thread Kevan Miller
On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:58 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: Folks, a small change to Genesis was made to support a custom legal resource bundle for the GShell release. I'd like to get this out so we can get GShell out too. +1 -Release it +0 -Eh, whatever -1 -Um, no no no no no... +1

Re: Fewer gbean proxies on the horizon

2007-12-13 Thread Kevan Miller
On Dec 13, 2007, at 6:15 PM, David Jencks wrote: A really long time ago Dain made the server work without gbean proxies in gbean references, but we didn't enable this by default because it broke the admin console. While waiting for a build I had a look and think I've fixed the admin

Re: svn commit: r604053 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2007-12-13 Thread Jarek Gawor
Jason, Can you give a reason for this change? I might have to update a few machines. Thanks, Jarek On Dec 13, 2007 5:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jdillon Date: Thu Dec 13 14:41:50 2007 New Revision: 604053 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=604053view=rev Log: Require

Re: Our 2.1 assemblies are nearly 2x the size of 2.0.2

2007-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon
We can remove some of the gshell bloat by not using the gshell- embedable jar which contains xstream, jexl, log4j-diet, jline and some other bits which are already in the repository. Might drop things down by 1 or 2m. Also we can make a diet version of groovy and ant, containing on the

Re: svn commit: r604053 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2007-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon
Aye. --jason On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: I believe that the build will crash if you use Maven 2.0.8 That is probably why Jason forced the maven version. Jay Jarek Gawor wrote: Jason, Can you give a reason for this change? I might have to update a few machines.

Re: svn commit: r604053 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2007-12-13 Thread Jay D. McHugh
I believe that the build will crash if you use Maven 2.0.8 That is probably why Jason forced the maven version. Jay Jarek Gawor wrote: Jason, Can you give a reason for this change? I might have to update a few machines. Thanks, Jarek On Dec 13, 2007 5:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: svn commit: r604053 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2007-12-13 Thread Jarek Gawor
Ok, sure but doesn't that cut off 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 users? Jarek On Dec 13, 2007 8:28 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aye. --jason On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: I believe that the build will crash if you use Maven 2.0.8 That is probably why Jason forced

Re: svn commit: r604053 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml

2007-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon
I suppose 2.0.6 should work. We can include that. --jason -Original Message- From: Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:49:10 To:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r604053 - /geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml Ok, sure but doesn't that cut off 2.0.5 and

[jira] Commented: (GSHELL-97) License and Notice info for gshell-embeddable

2007-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551671 ] Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-97: Usage of the shade plugin is making this more of a pain to use a static or

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3705) Maven 2.0.8 causes build problems

2007-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
Maven 2.0.8 causes build problems - Key: GERONIMO-3705 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3705 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues)