[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6119) upgrade geronimo-system to use commons-jexl 2.0

upgrade geronimo-system to use commons-jexl 2.0 --- Key: GERONIMO-6119 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6119 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level:

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6119) upgrade geronimo-system to use commons-jexl 2.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13089300#comment-13089300 ] Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-6119: commit the fix at revision: 1160559 upgrade

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release

Hi Kevan, Will you plan to be the release manager of the Geronimo 3.0? If not, I am volunteer to do this job. And my target is to get a Geronimo 3.0 release out in the shortest time. The current snapshot dependencies are: 1. xbeanVersion3.8-SNAPSHOT/xbeanVersion 2.

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-5987) The ActiveMQ working directory and port are not referenced correctly - multiple instances not possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5987: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-5987-new.patch The ActiveMQ working directory and port are not referenced

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-5987) The ActiveMQ working directory and port are not referenced correctly - multiple instances not possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13089316#comment-13089316 ] Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-5987: With my new patch in ARIES-727 and

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6120) Could not connect to karaf shell by SSH

Could not connect to karaf shell by SSH --- Key: GERONIMO-6120 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6120 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues)

Re: Is there possible for 1.7.0 release ?

Hi, Andreas, thanks for following this, and do you plan to review those JIRAs recently ? Geronimo community hopes to release 3.0 recently, if you are busy with other stuffs, is it possible to have Axis2 1.6.1 release ? Thanks. 2011/8/11 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com Thanks, Andreas. 2011/8/11

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6120) Could not connect to karaf shell by SSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Han Hong Fang reassigned GERONIMO-6120: --- Assignee: Han Hong Fang Could not connect to karaf shell by SSH

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6118) Unable to create plan by Plan Creator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13089335#comment-13089335 ] Shenghao Fang commented on GERONIMO-6118: - Hi Ivan, I'm not very clear about

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6118) Unable to create plan by Plan Creator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13089337#comment-13089337 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-6118: It looks to me that the issue might also exist for

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6118) Unable to create plan by Plan Creator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13089340#comment-13089340 ] Shenghao Fang commented on GERONIMO-6118: - I got it. You mean that adding the

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6118) Unable to create plan by Plan Creator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shenghao Fang updated GERONIMO-6118: Regression: [Regression] Affects Version/s: 3.0 Unable to create plan by

Re: Any plan for releasing MyFaces 2.0.8 ?

Thanks, that is great ! 2011/8/23 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com Hi, Yes, Leonardo will start the release procedure soon! Regards, Jakob 2011/8/23 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com: Hi, I found MyFaces community is voting for some components. is the 2.0.8 on the schedule now ?

Re: svn commit: r1096951 [6/6] - in /geronimo/server/trunk: ./ framework/ framework/assemblies/ framework/assemblies/geronimo-framework/ framework/buildsupport/car-maven-plugin/src/main/filtered-resou

Followed up with Infra and we're using the better part of 67GB of /tmp in buildbot (around 50GB). Will add the fix back in tomorrow. -David On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:27 PM, David Jencks wrote: I'm not sure how this got removed, but this is in what turned into the 3.0-osgi branch, not current

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1160628

Geronimo Revision: 1160628 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110823/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110823/unit-test-reports

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release

If we want the community to help us test the jetty assembly, do we release it too - somehow? Can we comment out the jetty assemblies for a release, as you said, then uncomment them and produce a 3.0 Beta for the jetty assembly? Is it appropriate to have a tomcat assembly in 3.0, but the

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1160806

Geronimo Revision: 1160806 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110823/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110823/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1160922

Geronimo Revision: 1160922 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110823/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110823/unit-test-reports

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6118) Unable to create plan by Plan Creator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13089966#comment-13089966 ] Shenghao Fang commented on GERONIMO-6118: - Add cleanup action to each catch

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6118) Unable to create plan by Plan Creator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shenghao Fang resolved GERONIMO-6118. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Unable to create plan by Plan Creator

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release

On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote: I assume Geronimo 3.0 will be released without dependencies on 3rd party SNAPSHOTs. Correct? Any release we do will be free of *snapshot* dependencies. However, there have been instances where we (and other apache projects) have generated

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release

On Aug 22, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Rex Wang wrote: I would like to ship a Geronimo 3.0 Beta, it is more flexible since we can make the dependencies build by ourselves and make a release quickly. It is really long time of the Java EE 6 development procedure, we need provide a release to the

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release

On Aug 22, 2011, at 2:23 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: Can we use local release dependencies for full 3.0 release too ?If we can, I prefer to release 3.0 directly instead of beta. If really hard-pressed, maybe -- assuming that the Geronimo community has the knowledge, expertise, and

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release

On Aug 22, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Rex Wang wrote: One thing I think that might be a problem in future is, IIRC, in OSGi world, the version 3.0.0.03.0.0.Beta3.0.0.M13.0.0.SNAPSHOT. This might not cause any issue in server runtime, but if we wanna leverage more OSGi functionality, eg. the OBR

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release

On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:59 AM, Rex Wang wrote: Hi Kevan, Will you plan to be the release manager of the Geronimo 3.0? If not, I am volunteer to do this job. And my target is to get a Geronimo 3.0 release out in the shortest time. Cool. I'm quite happy to have someone else be release

Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release

On Aug 23, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote: If we want the community to help us test the jetty assembly, do we release it too - somehow? Yes, I think so. Can we comment out the jetty assemblies for a release, as you said, then uncomment them and produce a 3.0 Beta for the

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-735) More user friendly message when deploying OSGi application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-735. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0-M2)