Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/27#issuecomment-76464277
Committed to SVN trunk
http://svn.apache.org/r1662807
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/27#issuecomment-76522716
Yes, please do so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/29#issuecomment-79344099
I committed your changes to SVN trunk with some minor tweaks
http://svn.apache.org/r1666565
Please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/9#issuecomment-83630948
What number in percent are we looking at?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/9#issuecomment-83640151
Thread locals are really a double-edged sword and should be used sparingly
in low level libraries. Can we provide a strategy interface similar to
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpasyncclient/pull/3#issuecomment-97368843
Committed to SVN trunk
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1676697
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1676698
---
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/30#issuecomment-105929690
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch.
Oleg
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/30#issuecomment-105947434
Likely within two weeks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/10#issuecomment-108560258
Committed to SVN and 4.4.x branch
http://svn.apache.org/r1683402
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/32#issuecomment-108767608
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch.
http://svn.apache.org/r1683475
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/34#issuecomment-131556296
Changes committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch. Many thanks, Benson, for
contributing them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/34#issuecomment-131831413
Hi Benson,
There turned out to be a complication with the patch. It looks like some of
the dependencies introduced by the patch required Java 1.7 or newer. Ideally
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/11#issuecomment-134546155
Patch committed to SVN trunk and 4.4.x branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/35#issuecomment-134549644
Sebastian
We cannot commit this patch to 4.5.x due to its changing the API signature
of URIBuilder. There is unlikely to ever be a 4.6 series so this change can be
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/12#issuecomment-135003876
Change-set committed to SVN trunk and 4.4.x branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/35#issuecomment-135077944
I am fine with committing the patch to the trunk (5.0). Michael, do you
think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/35#issuecomment-135368968
@michael-o Yes, that is the case. URIBuilder has not been reviewed for RFC
3986 conformance.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/13#issuecomment-136124713
Patch committed to SVN trunk
http://svn.apache.org/r1700104
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/36#issuecomment-147330073
If you want this patch committed to the stable 4.5 branch could you please
make your code Java 1.6 compatible and also avoid using * imports?
Any development
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/36#issuecomment-147699032
I would add one last thing here. I think it would be reasonable to not
attempt to buffer the entity content if it is too large or its length is
unknown. I would put a
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/36#issuecomment-147998982
One can always use BufferedHttpEntity to explicitly buffer entities of
arbitrary length or explicitly write multipart content out to a byte[]. What I
avoid is causing
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/36#issuecomment-149882164
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch with some modifications
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1709814&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/17#issuecomment-155397983
DefaultHttpRequestWriter is the wrong place to add headers. This should be
done by a protocol interceptor. But I can take from there.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/17#issuecomment-156049332
Patch with changes committed to SVN trunk
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1713993&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/37#issuecomment-165163769
Committed with changes to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1720386&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/18#issuecomment-165787792
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.4.x branch
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1720791&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/38#issuecomment-166608233
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1721386&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/41#issuecomment-168395979
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1722632&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/44#issuecomment-174970078
There will be no more releases from 4.3.x branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/43#issuecomment-174970186
There will be no more releases from 4.4.x branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/45#issuecomment-180428386
I am certainly fine with it, but we ought not add new methods to stable
branches like 4.5.x. Trunk is a whole different story.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/21#issuecomment-181090412
Good catch. I'll review and commit the patch in the coming days.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/21#issuecomment-184227762
Dmitry,
Curiously enough I had to fix a very similar race condition not that long
ago. See 4c5947e4913c983b905d9d79db123a5b900a8b9a.
Would you be OK with a
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/46#issuecomment-184228986
@enenum Is 967056f necessary?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/46#issuecomment-184230864
@enenum Essentially, I should only merge 8ac1fe5? Please confirm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/21#issuecomment-184235584
Wonderful. I'll commit the fix to the ASF repository once I get your
confirmation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/21#issuecomment-185209079
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.4.x branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/46#issuecomment-185217991
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch. Please verify and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/22#issuecomment-195036782
@dbantchovski Do you think you could also add a test case for this defect?
See src/test/java/org/apache/http/pool/TestConnPool.java
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/25#issuecomment-195361845
The build is currently broken due to style check violations
https://builds.apache.org/job/httpcomponents-core-5.x/93/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/22#issuecomment-197276005
committed to SVN trunk and 4.4.x branch
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1735209&view=rev
Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/28#issuecomment-206178824
Patch committed to SVN trunk and 4.4.x branch. Please review and close
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/29#issuecomment-207440860
Committed to SVN 4.4.x branch
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1738245&view=rev
Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/36#issuecomment-207750257
You are welcome to contribute improved javadocs / documentation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/49#issuecomment-219511546
Committed to SVN 4.4.x branch. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/50#issuecomment-219511824
What branch is this patch intended for?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ok2c commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/50#issuecomment-219699597
The actual stable branch is 4.5.x [1]. There will be no more releases off
4.4.x branch.
[1] https://github.com/apache/httpclient/tree/4.5.x
---
If your
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/51
Committed to SVN 4.5.x
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1746752&view=rev
Please review and close
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/52
Sebastien
What was the reason for changing AuthScope class and including a URL
attribute in the auth scope? Based on my reading of the HTTP spec
authentication context is defined by the realm of
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/52
Sebastien,
Nothing should stop you from getting the actual request URI by reading the
[HTTP_REQUEST](http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-core-4.4.x/httpcore/apidocs/org/apache/http/protocol
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/52
I have no problem of what so ever with changing CredentialsProvider in 5.0
if it is justified.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/52
I have a question. Why cannot you build the URL from AuthScope attributes
if effectively you only need the authority part (scheme://host:port)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user ok2c commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/55#discussion_r71292523
--- Diff:
httpclient5/src/main/java/org/apache/hc/client5/http/impl/auth/SystemDefaultCredentialsProvider.java
---
@@ -88,35 +93,51 @@ public void
Github user ok2c commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/56#discussion_r72047002
--- Diff:
httpclient5-osgi/src/main/java/org/apache/hc/client5/http/osgi/impl/RelaxedLayeredConnectionSocketFactory.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/58
Committed to SVN 4.5.x branch. Please review and close the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/57
Committed to SVN trunk. Please review and close the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/55
Committed to SVN trunk. Please review and close the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/52
Obsoleted by #55. Please close
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpasyncclient/pull/5
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.1.x branch. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/59
Committed to SVN 4.5.x branch. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/60
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/61
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/31
Committed to SVN trunk. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/32
Committed to SVN trunk with some changes
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775588&view=rev
Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/32
Committed to SVN trunk
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775806&view=rev
Please review and close.
PS: The 5.0-alpha2 release vote is ongoing. However due to the time of
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/33
Committed to SVN trunk
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775805&view=rev
Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/34
This has certainly nothing to do with your changes. It may not even be a
bug. It is conceivable that server was overloaded and the request timed out
after 5 seconds.
---
If your project is set up
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/34
I think Gary owns the Travis CI job and only he can trigger job executions.
Ignore it for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/62
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/35
Fixed in SVN trunk and 4.4.x branch. Please review and close.
Oleg
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ok2c commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/64#discussion_r99915066
--- Diff:
httpclient/src/main/java/org/apache/http/client/utils/URIBuilder.java ---
@@ -26,18 +26,18 @@
*/
package org.apache.http.client.utils
Github user ok2c commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/64#discussion_r99915529
--- Diff:
httpclient/src/main/java/org/apache/http/client/utils/URIBuilder.java ---
@@ -492,8 +492,8 @@ public String toString() {
private
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/64
Committed to SVN 4.5.x branch. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/37
Committed to SVN trunk. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/65
+1 to @fxbonnet's comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/65
@pmouawad I'll happily help with the migration (either to 4.5 or 5.0
depending on your preference) but opening up deprecated APIs looks wrong to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/65
@pmouawad it is one thing to back-port a fix or a feature that has no API
impact but this is a whole different thing to start opening up private methods.
It will take a while for 5.0 to mature
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
Radovan,
NTLM used to be legal a legal minefield in the past. I still feel a bit
uncomfortable just pulling in code related to Microsoft proprietary protocols
without some due diligence. Was
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
The issue has been discussed with ASF legal ([see
LEGAL-80](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-80?jql=project%20%3D%20LEGAL%20AND%20text%20~%20NTLM)).
Given you are an existing ASF
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
@DaddyWri Karl, Do you think you could review changes to NTLMScheme and
just ignore the rest? We could incorporate those changes if they make sense to
you and leave the rest.
---
If your project
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
@DaddyWri I am not feeling comfortable committing code that we are not able
to maintain properly and the original contributor is unwilling to put any extra
work into.
---
If your project is set up
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
@DaddyWri I leave this patch at your mercy. You are the only person on the
project both capable and willing to put some effort into NTLM related code,
therefore your opinion matters most. Do not
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
@semancik Try contributing to a larger ASF project such as CXF that impose
_very_ strict style requirements and conformance with static code analysis
rules and then come back. HC style check barely
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
@semancik do not change formatting of existing classes and you will be fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
@semancik You were politely requested to reformat your code to reduce noise
in the change set due to different formatting in order to make the changes
easier to understand. This has nothing to do
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
@DaddyWri Ignore HttpClient 5 entirely for now. Develop your code against
4.5 APIs either on GitHub or on a branch in SVN. I'll merge the changes to
trunk once everything is ready.
---
If
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/38
Patch committed to SVN trunk. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/28
Committed to SVN trunk and 4.5.x branch. Please review and close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/66
The original change set has been committed to SVN 4.5.x, 4.6.x and trunk
(5.0). Please review and close
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user ok2c commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/40#discussion_r109109041
--- Diff: httpcore/src/main/java/org/apache/http/ssl/SSLContextBuilder.java
---
@@ -272,6 +274,20 @@ public SSLContext build() throws
Github user ok2c commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/40#discussion_r109145659
--- Diff: httpcore/src/main/java/org/apache/http/ssl/SSLContextBuilder.java
---
@@ -272,6 +274,20 @@ public SSLContext build() throws
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/41
@lujianbo Builders with mutually exclusive settings have been causing a lot
of grief in HC 4.x. We are trying to not repeat the same mistake in HC 5.0. I
think `#useProvider(String)` could be dropped
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/41
You can push to the same branch. No need to create a new PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcore/pull/41
We have already repeatedly violated this policy in 4.4.x, so we might as
well do it again, as long as it is just a setter method.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/73
Committed to SVN trunk, 4.5.x branch and 4.6.x branch. Please review and
close.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/73
No immediate plans
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/74
@pavolloffay I am still working on a redesign of request execution pipeline
in my private branch (both classic and async). It will likely take me another
week or two to complete. Please just bear
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/75
@pmouawad I am not sure it is a good idea to introduce a hard dependency on
an external library for a single decompression codec, especially given it is
quite easy to plug it in with
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/75
What we can do is to add org.brotli:dec as an optional dependency
(mandatory at compile and optional at runtime) and wire it up _only_ if it is
actually on the classpath. Users would need to
Github user ok2c commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpclient/pull/76
Looks good to me. Could you please do the same for the async client builder?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
