+1
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Wang Jiajun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.8.2. This is the 14th release of Helix as an Apache project, as
> well as the 10th release as a top-level Apache project.
>
> Apache Helix is a
Hi Dlmuthu,
Could you give us a bit more context? What kind of operations are you doing
and what are the characteristics (config settings) for these workflows?
On a cursory look, it seems that the workflow
+1
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:09 PM Lei Xia wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:48 PM Xue Junkai wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> > Helix 0.8.3. This is the 15th release of Helix as an Apache project, as
> > well as
26, 2019 at 12:57 PM Wang Jiajun wrote:
> +1
>
> Best Regards,
> Jiajun
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:43 PM Lei Xia wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:56 PM Hunter Lee wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to st
Let me add a caveat to my previous email. Although it comes with
scalability improvements, there are currently a few known issues with the
latest version. We'd encourage you to check back to make sure your current
usage isn't affected.
Hunter
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:35 PM Hunter Lee wrote
I would like to start a discussion on making Java 8 a minimum requirement
and upgrading the Maven version for Helix's next feature release. I'd like
to see how people feel about it.
Did some homework on this and dug up a few precedences that are also
top-level Apache projects dependent on
Hi Dimuthu -
1. In Task Framework, tasks are units of work that are mutually independent
- that is, Helix will schedule A and B without considering any dependency.
By what you said about how task A depends on B, what did you actually mean?
Is Task A blocking (sleeping) until some condition is met
Thanks everyone! Excited to be part of the group :)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:31 PM Lei Xia wrote:
> Welcome, Hunter!
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:54 PM Xue Junkai wrote:
>
> > Hi, All
> >
> >
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Helix
+1
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:49 PM Wang Jiajun wrote:
> +1
>
> Best Regards,
> Jiajun
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:26 PM Lei Xia wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:07 PM Xue Junkai wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > This is to call for a vote on releasing the following
It has come to our attention that there was a bug in Task Framework in
0.8.3. In short, Task Framework fails to honor instance tag constraints
when assigning tasks. This is critical and may break other services built
on Helix.
In order to fix forward, I'd like to solicit advice on how to
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:27 PM Hunter Lee wrote:
>
> > Hi Dimuthu,
> >
> > What Junkai meant by touching the IdealState is this:
> >
> > 1) use Zooinspector to log into ZK
> > 2) Locate the IDEALSTATES/ path
> > 3) grab any ZNode under that pa
Could a member of the PMC update the ticket for GitHub issues and wiki?
This was discussed informally offline, so please mention that we do not
have the record of it, but as long as the PMC could verify that we want
this for Helix, the infra team should be able to go ahead and do it for us.
Hey Dimuthu -
We are actually in the process of preparing a new release, and this will
come with the previously mentioned bug fixes in Task Framework. It also
contains various ZK-related fixes - I don't know what your deployment
schedule is but it might be worth the wait of another week or so.
Thanks for voting on the 0.9.0 release. It has now exceeded 72 hours so I
am closing the vote.
Binding +1s:
Kishore G.
Lei Xia
Junkai Xue
Nonbinding +1s:
Jiajun Wang
Binding 0s:
-
Nonbinding 0s:
-
Binding -1s:
-
Nonbinding -1s:
-
The vote has passed, thanks a lot to everyone for voting!
https://github.com/apache/helix/issues/323
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:09 AM Hunter Lee wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> Moving forward, let's use GitHub Issues over JIRA. It is closer to the
> code itself and arguably easier to link to and work with the code. I have
> created an issue ba
Hi all -
Moving forward, let's use GitHub Issues over JIRA. It is closer to the code
itself and arguably easier to link to and work with the code. I have
created an issue based on the JIRA Dimuthu provided for the time being.
Hunter
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 8:56 AM DImuthu Upeksha
wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.9.0. This is the 17th release of Helix as an Apache project, as
well as the 13th release as a top-level Apache project.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it easy
to build
Hi Apache infra -
We would like to enable the issues feature and the wiki feature GitHub
provides on Apache Helix's GitHub. How should we go about this?
Thanks in advance!
Hunter
Hi Apache Infra -
I'm wondering if there is a way to sync the GitHub issues created with our
corresponding Apache JIRA board. As in, if we create an issue/PR in GitHub,
is there a tool/support available that creates a JIRA ticket as well?
Or when Apache measures a project's activity, is there a
Created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18471
Thanks!
Hunter
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:49 PM Chris Lambertus wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 23, 2019, at 4:46 PM, Hunter Lee wrote:
> >
> > Hi Apache infra -
> >
> > We would like to enable the iss
at 10:28 AM Hunter Lee wrote:
> This email is to suggest the version bump up of ZkClient library used by
> Helix.
>
>1. We have noticed that sometimes ZK calls hang due to unknown
>reasons. This kind of issue seems to be commonly experienced by HBase
>users, but vario
This email is to suggest the version bump up of ZkClient library used by
Helix.
1. We have noticed that sometimes ZK calls hang due to unknown reasons.
This kind of issue seems to be commonly experienced by HBase users, but
various fixes have been incorporated to ZK in versions 3.4+. The
This might be a question for Apache Infra. Let me also write a quick email
and include the Helix dev mailing list.
Hunter
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 4:20 PM Wang Jiajun wrote:
> Hi Helix devs,
>
> I'm sending this mail for discussing Helix hot release. This is requested
> by our customer Pinot
+1
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 2:07 PM Wang Jiajun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.9.1. This is the 18th release of Helix as an Apache project, as
> well as the 14th release as a top-level Apache project.
>
> Apache Helix is a
Hi Dimuthu,
Are you using periodicalRebalance? That might trigger a rebalance
periodically even if there's no activity in the cluster.
As for the ConcurrentModification exception, I believe there was a patch
for that going from 0.8.2 to the latest on the upstream.
Hunter
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019
It is up now.
Hunter
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:48 AM Lei Xia wrote:
> Thanks Hunter, the release notes link seems not work?
>
>
> Lei
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:40 PM Hunter Lee wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is to call for a vote on releasing the
The Apache Helix Team is pleased to announce the 19th release,
0.9.4, of the Apache Helix project.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it easy
to build partitioned, fault tolerant, and scalable distributed systems.
The full release notes are available here:
Thanks for voting on the 0.9.4 release. It has now exceeded 72 hours so I
am closing the vote.
Binding +1s:
Lei Xia
Junkai Xue
Kishore G
Nonbinding +1s:
Binding 0s:
Nonbinding 0s:
Binding -1s:
Nonbinding -1s:
The vote has passed, thanks a lot to everyone for voting!
Hi Helix users and devs-
I sent out an email describing the separation of ZkClient into a separate
module a few weeks ago and would like to follow up.
I am currently getting https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/684 reviewed.
Here is the changelist:
1. Remove IOItec import
2. Create helix-common
Since I haven't heard back from anyone for some time, I'll go ahead with
the merge/review. Migration guide has been updated and published in the
GitHub wiki.
Hunter
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:30 PM Hunter Lee wrote:
> Hi Helix users and devs-
>
> I sent out an email describing the s
I am stopping the vote for 0.9.300 and re-creating 0.9.4.
Hunter
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:58 PM Hunter Lee wrote:
> Correction:
>
> Release notes:
> https://helix.apache.org/0.9.300-docs/releasenotes/release-0.9.300.html
>
> This page will be updated shortly. All other links
Correction:
Release notes:
https://helix.apache.org/0.9.300-docs/releasenotes/release-0.9.300.html
This page will be updated shortly. All other links have already been made
available.
Hunter
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:57 PM Hunter Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.9.4. This is the 19th release of Helix as an Apache project, as
well as the 15th release as a top-level Apache project.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it easy
to build
+1
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:00 PM Xue Junkai wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.9.5. This is the 22nd release of Helix as an Apache project, as
> well as the 18th release as a top-level Apache project. This release is
>
Hi,
We are tracking this issue. This was caused by an issue in the auto-merge
process. We'll be creating a fix shortly.
Hunter
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 5:04 AM anil (Jira) wrote:
> anil created HELIX-823:
> --
>
> Summary: run-helix-controller.sh command
+1. Thanks for putting this together!
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:25 PM Wang Jiajun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.9.8. This is the 23rd release of Helix as an Apache project, as
> well as the 19th release as a top-level Apache
There is a field you could set. You could look in JobConfig to see which
enum value you could set for task retries. It allows you to set two types
of delays - 1. before starting a task, and 2. delay between retries. These
are static values and we don't support exponential backoff yet.
Hunter
On
+1
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 7:43 AM Lei Xia wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 8:04 PM Xue Junkai wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> > Helix 0.9.9. This is the 24th release of Helix as an Apache project, as
> > well as the
+1
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 1:10 PM Junkai Xue wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 1.0.2. This is the 22nd release of Helix as an Apache project, as
> well as the 18th release as a top-level Apache project.
>
>
> Apache Helix is a
+1
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:34 PM Junkai Xue wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 1.0.2. This is the 22nd release of Helix as an Apache project, as
> well as the 18th release as a top-level Apache project.
>
>
> Apache Helix is a
f that's just my laptop or if it's a legitimate problem
> > introduced by this change, so any independent verification (maybe the PR
> > hooks already do this) would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try to
> > test this in one of our dev environments, but would it would be
sure things don't break I
> > suspect.
> >
> > ~Brent
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:42 PM Hunter Lee wrote:
> >
> >> This is being discussed. Feel free to post a patch if you're interested
> >> (but do let us know so there's no duplicate eff
This is being discussed. Feel free to post a patch if you're interested
(but do let us know so there's no duplicate effort being made here).
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:33 PM Brent wrote:
> [Feel free to take this offline or out-of-band if this is an inappropriate
> place to discuss this]
>
> Is
+1
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 1:10 PM Junkai Xue wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We would like to do a retrospective vote for Apache Helix 0.9.10 since
> 0.9.10 was a replacement of 0.9.9, which did not reflect the latest change
> when it was released.
>
> Content wise, there is no change on release note for
+1
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 6:26 PM Junkai Xue wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
> Apache Helix 1.0.3. This is the 24th release of Helix as an Apache
> project, as well as the 20th release as a top-level Apache project.
>
> Apache Helix is a
+1
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 1:34 AM Junkai Xue wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
> Apache Helix 1.0.4. This is the 25th release of Helix as an Apache
> project, as well as the 21st release as a top-level Apache project.
>
> Apache Helix is a
46 matches
Mail list logo
