Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-19 Thread Ashutosh Chauhan
This vote stands cancelled because of various problems people have found in RC0. Thanks to all who tried RC0. I will respin RC1 shortly. Thanks, Ashutosh On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:50, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.orgwrote: Hey all, Apache Hive 0.9.0-rc0 is out and available at

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-18 Thread Lars Francke
Hey, thanks for putting up the RC. We tried it yesterday and we stumbled across HIVE-2958 which seems like a bug that should be fixed before release because it was introduced with HIVE-1634 which is new to 0.9 too and breaks GROUP BY queries on HBase which were working before. -1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-18 Thread Owen O'Malley
I'm -1 (nonbinding) on rc0 so that we can incorporate HIVE-2930, which fixes the Apache headers on the source files. (Thanks for committing that!) -- Owen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-18 Thread Kevin Wilfong
Regarding HIVE-2795, that Python script was intended to solve two problems. 1) The null pointer exception that resulted from calling describe formatted on a view partition 2) View partitions did not have storage descriptors, so they did not have a concept of region like other objects. 2 no

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-18 Thread Ashutosh Chauhan
Hey Lars, Thanks for taking a look. HIVE-1634 introduced new storage type for hbase tables, namely binary. Since, bug manifests itself only for binary storage type. This doesnt count as a regression since functionality for binary storage itself was added through HIVE-1634. Since, this is not a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-18 Thread Carl Steinbach
Hi Kevin I can add a patch removing the need for this script and the script itself to be included in the release. This sounds like the best option to me. Are there any drawbacks to this approach? Thanks. Carl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-18 Thread Kevin Wilfong
The only drawbacks I can think of are 1) As I mentioned, view partitions will not have an associated region, but I don't think this matters to anyone else. 2) There will be an inconsistency in DESCRIBE FORMATTED, in that for view partitions it will not list storage data. This seems inherent in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-16 Thread Carl Steinbach
-1 * RELEASE_NOTES.txt needs to be updated. * The Postgres metastore upgrade scripts should be excluded from the tarball since they are not current. There is already a build property that handles this (include.postgres), which should default to false. * HIVE-2795 added a python metastore

[VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-13 Thread Ashutosh Chauhan
Hey all, Apache Hive 0.9.0-rc0 is out and available at http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hive-0.9.0-rc0/ Release notes are available at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310843version=12317742 Please give it a try, let us know. Hive PMC members: Please test

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0

2012-04-13 Thread Ashutosh Chauhan
Couple more points: Maven artifacts are available at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-043/ for folks to try out. Vote runs for 3 business days so will expire on Wednesday, 4/18. Thanks, Ashutosh On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:50, Ashutosh Chauhan