AW: mod_proxy_fcgi and flush

Von: Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 09:52 An: Apache HTTP Server Development List Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_fcgi and flush Hi Jacob, Helmut! 2017-07-06 20:54 GMT+02:00 Jacob Champion

Re: An ask for eyes on proposal

Based on the fact that Jim's advanced this for consideration for 2.4.28, any further feedback on the following proposal to make RemoteIPProxyProtocol directive into a whitelist (to compliment the current blacklist directive)? E.g. in the spirit of the protocol, assign specific remote ip consumers

Re: httpd 2.4.26 with apr 1.6 ExtFilterDefine

I am very confused, examined apr 1.6 threadproc deltas, now looking at the mpm, but reporter isolated to apr. Next place I plan to look is is the fileio abstraction. I am beginning to suspect this is 'that customer'... In my experience, the one who duct tapes and binds in entirely unrelated

Re: svn commit: r1730079 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: Makefile.in acinclude.m4 build/config_vars.sh.in

Some time this week, I'm going to propose this patch for backport, since I rely on it for the `make check` feature and I want to get that into 2.4.x. Rainer, if you (or anyone else) have reservations, please let me know. --Jacob On 02/12/2016 09:46 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote: Author: rjung

Re: rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127

Hi Jean-Frederic, On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > According rfc1123 the configuration: > ProxyPass "/" "balancer://127" > > BalancerMember ajp://tomcat1:8009 > BalancerMember ajp://tomcat2:8009 > > > 127 looks valid but it is rejected

Re: mod_proxy_fcgi and flush

Hi Rüdiger, 2017-07-10 8:31 GMT+02:00 Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group < ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>: > > > > > *Von:* Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com] > *Gesendet:* Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 09:52 > *An:* Apache HTTP Server Development List > *Betreff:* Re:

rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127

Hi, According rfc1123 the configuration: ProxyPass "/" "balancer://127" BalancerMember ajp://tomcat1:8009 BalancerMember ajp://tomcat2:8009 127 looks valid but it is rejected by httpd, apr_parse_addr_port() takes 127 as port instead hostname. So addr is NULL, then I have: "AH01157:

Re: 2.4.27

Am 06.07.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Jacob Champion: Administrators using prefork who would like to switch to HTTP/2 in the future need to understand the limitations of the prefork architecture they have selected. And sure, our users can request that we implement a solution that "just works" with

PROXY protocol support

Now that 2.4.27 is (almost) out, there are some other patches in STATUS that would be good to finalize, including in particular, the support for the HAproxy PROXY protocol support. To help, I've gone ahead and created an updated, merge-clean patch as well as created tests for it in the Perl

AW: rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 10. Juli 2017 15:33 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127 > > Personally, I think we simply document that balancer names > must start w/ a character. +1

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.2.34

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:33 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > For your consideration... pre-release candidate tarballs of > Apache legacy httpd 2.2.34 can be found in; > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Thanks all who merged the security work in and other fixes, > and

Re: rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127

Personally, I think we simply document that balancer names must start w/ a character. > On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Hi, > > According rfc1123 the configuration: > ProxyPass "/" "balancer://127" > >BalancerMember ajp://tomcat1:8009 >

Re: PROXY protocol support

Do I sense the sweet smell of monthly releases in the air? > Am 10.07.2017 um 16:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > Now that 2.4.27 is (almost) out, there are some other > patches in STATUS that would be good to finalize, including > in particular, the support for the HAproxy PROXY

Re: 2.4.27

On 06 Jul 2017, at 5:15 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > This is not a bug, it is the collision of the processing models. > > So, I think disabling it prevent user from shooting themselves in the foot. > If you are on prefork, you'd want the 6 parallel HTTP/1.1