Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

2017-09-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett: On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next release is 2.4.16 because it looks not really sane Looks perfectly sensible to me in your

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

2017-09-29 Thread Graham Leggett
On 28 Sep 2017, at 7:10 PM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote: > I have a question. Why are you tagging a release and do testing? Most of > the time a problem is found and a new release is tagged and it starts > over (I think the max was a 3 or 4 patch level jump). > > Why not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

2017-09-29 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett: >> >> On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

2017-09-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.09.2017 um 14:16 schrieb Eric Covener: On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett: On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: it's not about cheap - it's just

Re: svn commit: r1810121 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/mime.types

2017-09-29 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Does this raise concerns for anyone? I'd note than in the case of the x-font items, we entirely skipped application/font- promotions prior to font/* registry. It doesn't seem sane to keep x- tags for posterity, but we might want to mention the previous application/* types... however we have no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

2017-09-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.09.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Graham Leggett: On 28 Sep 2017, at 7:10 PM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote: I have a question. Why are you tagging a release and do testing? Most of the time a problem is found and a new release is tagged and it starts over (I think the max

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

2017-09-29 Thread Graham Leggett
On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next > release is 2.4.16 because it looks not really sane Looks perfectly sensible to me. Regards, Graham — smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

2017-09-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
It's fair to reiterate first that most folks here don't care and "get it"... but let me offer another perspective that folks may have to deal with. Devil's advocate here, and all that. 1.2.4 is released. It contains security fixes 1.2.5 is burned during RM 1.2.6 is burned during RM 1.2.7 is