Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [X] +1: It's not just good,

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Yann Ylavic
+1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Tested on Debian(s) 7/8/9/10, MPM event/worker/prefork, APR 1.6.5, OpenSSL 1.0.1 => 1.1.0. Thanks Daniel.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:56:52 -0500 Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > Builds fine (once I'd found a keyserver that would talk to my gpg today), but the tests bombed on me.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Wow - that's actually really cool! Thanks for sharing - would love to see a HOWTO. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-19 14:59, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:

trunk proxy_http failures

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
Hi, the h2 test suite has tests with http/2 in the front and a standard proxy_http to localhost. When running the test suite against trunk, the tests run into a failed GET on a proxy. The request hangs 5 seconds and the fails reading the status line, as seen below. The proxy is defined as:

Re: trunk proxy_http failures

2018-09-19 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 4:10 PM Stefan Eissing wrote: > > > BalancerMember "https://127.0.0.1:SUBST_PORT_HTTPS_SUBST; > hcmethod=GET hcuri=/ Does disablereuse=on help here? > > ... > ProxyPass "/proxy" "balancer://http-local" > ProxyPassReverse "/proxy"

Re: trunk proxy_http failures

2018-09-19 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 4:46 PM Stefan Eissing wrote: > > Thanks, Yann, this helped me pin the problem down further: > > - with disablereuse=on everything works fine > - with ttl=1 the problem is still there Is the KeepAliveTimeout on the backend side above 1 (second)? > > and then: > - with

Re: minor nit in mod_ssl

2018-09-19 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:39 AM Stefan Eissing wrote: > > > Am 18.09.2018 um 15:44 schrieb Houser, Rick : > > > > In the same vein, I’ve been running this patch on our builds to get > around a warning for certificates not matching the hostname. Certificates > are not expected to match the

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-19 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:56 AM Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Apache Lounge wrote: > > Are there examples what (maybe) does not work with OpenSSL 1.1.1 ? > > Have you run the test suite? The flipped setting of SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY > is expected to break TLSv1.2 as

Re: trunk proxy_http failures

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
Thanks, Yann, this helped me pin the problem down further: - with disablereuse=on everything works fine - with ttl=1 the problem is still there and then: - with mpm_worker, the problem also disappears (no disable/ttl needed) These tests were running since the dawn of h2 time and are still

Re: Write a module to overwrite HTTP methods handling

2018-09-19 Thread Nick Kew
> On 19 Sep 2018, at 13:57, Danesh Daroui wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am sorry if my question is a bit off! I am wondering whether it is > possible to write a server module that can handle different HTTP > methods in a customized way? Of course it's possible, and indeed common: see for example

Re: Write a module to overwrite HTTP methods handling

2018-09-19 Thread Danesh Daroui
Hi Nick, Thank you for your answer. I guess module for CGI would be a guideline for what I need to do. I just want to double check whether I am on the right track or not. So when a HTTP request with a query string is received, in my mind, the only way to handle it is the CGI which would in turn

Re: trunk proxy_http failures

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 19.09.2018 um 17:12 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 4:46 PM Stefan Eissing > wrote: >> >> Thanks, Yann, this helped me pin the problem down further: >> >> - with disablereuse=on everything works fine >> - with ttl=1 the problem is still there > > Is the

Re: trunk proxy_http failures

2018-09-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
Does folding http://home.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/2.4.x-mpms_async_objects_lifetime.patch into 2.4.x make any difference?? > On Sep 19, 2018, at 10:10 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > Hi, > > the h2 test suite has tests with http/2 in the front and a standard > proxy_http to localhost.

Re: trunk proxy_http failures

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
Can try tomorrow. > Am 19.09.2018 um 17:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > Does folding > http://home.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/2.4.x-mpms_async_objects_lifetime.patch > into 2.4.x make any difference?? > >> On Sep 19, 2018, at 10:10 AM, Stefan Eissing >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> the h2 test

Re: minor nit in mod_ssl

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 18.09.2018 um 15:44 schrieb Houser, Rick : > > In the same vein, I’ve been running this patch on our builds to get around a > warning for certificates not matching the hostname. Certificates are not > expected to match the hostname with many load balancing/uptime detection > schemes,

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-19 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Apache Lounge wrote: > Are there examples what (maybe) does not work with OpenSSL 1.1.1 ? Have you run the test suite? The flipped setting of SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY is expected to break TLSv1.2 as well, that problem is consistent with the hangs Daniel

Write a module to overwrite HTTP methods handling

2018-09-19 Thread Danesh Daroui
Hi all, I am sorry if my question is a bit off! I am wondering whether it is possible to write a server module that can handle different HTTP methods in a customized way? I mean, if I want to perform some action when GET with some specific parameters comes in and/or PUT, POST or DELETE as well,

Re: svn commit: r1841330 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ STATUS modules/http2/h2_bucket_beam.c modules/http2/h2_from_h1.c modules/http2/h2_h2.c modules/http2/h2_headers.c modules/http2/h2_mplx.c

2018-09-19 Thread ste...@eissing.org
Thanks, Jim! > Am 19.09.2018 um 14:55 schrieb j...@apache.org: > > Author: jim > Date: Wed Sep 19 12:55:26 2018 > New Revision: 1841330 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1841330=rev > Log: > Merge r1835118 from trunk: > > On the trunk: > > * silencing gcc uninitialized warning > *

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Gregg Smith
On 9/17/2018 5:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Steffen
All fine here on Windows. > Op 18 sep. 2018 om 02:56 heeft Daniel Ruggeri het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 09/19/2018 01:18 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 9/17/2018 5:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all;     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release ... Nothing seen

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:57 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
-1, the tag is not from HEAD of 2.4.x. Specifically it seems to me it is missing: r1840757 | jim | 2018-09-12 22:38:02 +0200 (Mi, 12 Sep 2018) | 12 lines Merge r1840010 from trunk: ... Can someone confirm that the tag seems to miss changes at the time it was done? -Stefan > Am 18.09.2018

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 09/19/2018 10:56 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: -1, the tag is not from HEAD of 2.4.x. Specifically it seems to me it is missing: r1840757 | jim | 2018-09-12 22:38:02 +0200 (Mi, 12 Sep 2018) | 12 lines Merge r1840010 from trunk: ... Can someone confirm that the tag seems to miss changes at

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
Apologies, my mistake. Was going down the wrong rabbit hole and ended in a version 0.0.01 off. :-S Stefan > Am 19.09.2018 um 11:05 schrieb Daniel Gruno : > > On 09/19/2018 10:56 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> -1, the tag is not from HEAD of 2.4.x. >> Specifically it seems to me it is missing: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
+1 h2 testsuite: - MacOS 10.13 - Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS (i386) - Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS (x86_64) md testsuite - MacOS 10.13 Looks good, thanks for RMing! -Stefan > Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-19 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:19:10AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:43 AM Joe Orton wrote: > > You'll likely see issues testing against OpenSSL 1.1.1 until the TLSv1.3 > > merge is integrated for 2.4.x, yeah, I wouldn't worry about that. > > But I think this is worth

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 07:56:52PM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Noel Butler
On 18/09/2018 10:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ all good on slackware 13.0+ with apr 1.6.5 and apr-util 1.6.1 -- Kind Regards, Noel Butler This Email,

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-19 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/19/2018 12:54 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:19:10AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:43 AM Joe Orton wrote: >>> You'll likely see issues testing against OpenSSL 1.1.1 until the TLSv1.3 >>> merge is integrated for 2.4.x, yeah, I wouldn't

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
+1 > Am 19.09.2018 um 12:54 schrieb Joe Orton : > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:19:10AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:43 AM Joe Orton wrote: >>> You'll likely see issues testing against OpenSSL 1.1.1 until the TLSv1.3 >>> merge is integrated for 2.4.x, yeah, I

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-19 Thread Apache Lounge
Are there examples what (maybe) does not work with OpenSSL 1.1.1 ? Build 2.4.35 with OpenSSL 1.1.1, no issues seen/reported. More then A week ago I ask already the community to test 2.4.34 with OpenSSL 1.1.1 also no issue reported. Plan to ship 2.4.35 with OpenSSL1.1.1 With our