On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates,
> right?
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would
+1 from me on my macOS machine.
> Am 07.06.2022 um 10:58 schrieb Joe Orton :
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build
>> candidates, right?
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find below the proposed
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:25 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All good on Linux Debian(s).
Thanks Stefan for RMing!
Seems a lot of people are either on vacation or busy - and that is fine.
Since the rc* candidates merely differed on the TCP_FLUSH defines, I tend
to count all positive votes as still applicable!
Otherwise, speak up!
Kind Regards,
Stefan
> Am 07.06.2022 um 12:00 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
>
+1 All looks fine on Windows.
> Op 6 jun. 2022 om 16:25 heeft Stefan Eissing het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build
> candidates, right?
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
>
> Am 07.06.2022 um 12:21 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:25 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54:
>
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>
> All good on
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 6:04 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Seems a lot of people are either on vacation or busy - and that is fine.
>
> Since the rc* candidates merely differed on the TCP_FLUSH defines, I tend
> to count all positive votes as still applicable!
+1 aix/xlc/ppc64
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates,
right?
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a
On 6/7/22 12:02, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Seems a lot of people are either on vacation or busy - and that is fine.
>
> Since the rc* candidates merely differed on the TCP_FLUSH defines, I tend
> to count all positive votes as still applicable!
>
+1 Fedora 36, OpenBSD 7.1 and OpenBSD-current.