+1 This sounds like a good way forward.
> Am 09.02.2018 um 14:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: > > > >> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> >> Since you won't permit 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, we can presume this >> was just a strawman? >> > > That is a false statement. If enough people wanted 2.6/3.0 to come > into existence, it would have. > > All I want is new functionality to be in our end-users hands > in a reasonable time-frame. The *only* way to do that is > via back porting to 2.4.x, due to the amount of time it > will take to release 2.6/3.0. During that time, httpd will further > lag behind, providing ammunition for further FUD and, IMO, > not serving our community well. > > I will make a commitment: as soon as we get 2.4.30 out, assuming > it has PROXY and uwsgi support, I will focus on helping get > 2.6/3.0 out on a fast-track schedule. My plan will be to > have a GM by sometime in May.
