Astrid Keßler wrote:
I do think that mod_userdir, mod_asis, mod_imap, and mod_status should
_not_ be enabled by default in the configuration, although I see no
reason why the should not be built at compile time.
The point is: these modules are copiled statically (by default). I would
not
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Greg Ames wrote:
Rich Bowen wrote:
The comment about mod_asis was probably
unwarranted. I think that there are probably people that use mod_asis.
We did use mod_asis on daedalus not too long ago, but don't seem to at present.
I have no way of knowing how
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Astrid [ISO-8859-1] Keßler wrote:
I suggest to remove from default:
mod_userdir, mod_asis, mod_imap and mod_status
I'm not sure about mod_userdir. It's used, yes, but it need not be
default. I think of mod_userdir as an additional feature.
Based on IRC and mailing
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
1. This might be a good opportunity to go through the whole list and see
what should be in and out of a default build. For example, mod_expires
might be a good addition. Of course, I don't have time to do this myself
at the moment, so feel free to
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Greg Ames wrote:
Rich Bowen wrote:
The comment about mod_asis was probably
unwarranted. I think that there are probably people that use mod_asis.
I myself have used it more than once, and I don't get
all that tricky with my code. It allows some
Astrid Keßler wrote:
I suggest to remove from default:
mod_userdir, mod_asis, mod_imap and mod_status
Most users don't know what to do with mod_asis or how to read
mod_status. The only active installation of mod_status I've ever seen,
has been at beginners first servers.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:58:58AM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
Astrid Ke?ler wrote:
I suggest to remove from default:
mod_userdir, mod_asis, mod_imap and mod_status
Most users don't know what to do with mod_asis or how to read
mod_status. The only active installation of mod_status I've
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
I suggest to remove from default:
mod_userdir, mod_asis, mod_imap and mod_status
I'm not sure about mod_userdir. It's used, yes, but it need not be
default. I think of mod_userdir as an additional feature.
Based on IRC and mailing list
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
I suggest to remove from default:
mod_userdir, mod_asis, mod_imap and mod_status
I'm not sure about mod_userdir. It's used, yes, but it need not be
default. I think of mod_userdir as an
First, I'm talking about changes in 2.1 only. I'm opposed against
changing the module status in 1.3 or 2.0, too. :)
In this discussion about default modules, I hear three different things:
1) compile a module by default (or what category, e.g most or all)
2) enable a module in the
* David Burry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
are we talking about removing modules entirely, or just modifying what's
enabled by default?
Just what's enabled by default.
-Thom
Subject: Re: Proposal: Remove mod_imap from default list
--On Sunday, March 9, 2003 6:48 PM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2. If we want to keep our contract with the user about the stable series
valid, this change should go into 2.1 only. Otherwise, users doing a
configure
Rich Bowen wrote:
The comment about mod_asis was probably
unwarranted. I think that there are probably people that use mod_asis.
We did use mod_asis on daedalus not too long ago, but don't seem to at present.
I have no way of knowing how common it is. If we decide to not build it by
1. This might be a good opportunity to go through the whole list and see
what should be in and out of a default build. For example, mod_expires
might be a good addition. Of course, I don't have time to do this myself
at the moment, so feel free to ignore this comment.
2. If we want to keep
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Greg Ames wrote:
Rich Bowen wrote:
The comment about mod_asis was probably
unwarranted. I think that there are probably people that use mod_asis.
We did use mod_asis on daedalus not too long ago, but don't seem to at
present. I have no way of knowing how
* Astrid Keßler wrote:
agreed with the removings.
And I would add:
mod_logio and mod_expire
mod_logio... no. I think 'most' is a good (or say, better) place for it.
But I would consider mod_headers as a base module.
nd
--
Gib' mal folgendes in die Kommandozeile ein (und einen Moment
According to Rich Bowen:
[Remove mod_imap and mod_asis from the default list]
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- All the simple programs have been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - written, and all the good names taken.
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Rich Bowen:
[Remove mod_imap and mod_asis from the default list]
+1
Looking back, I think I've used each module once, but only mod_asis
within the last 5 or 6 years - I suppose most everyone use them
even less,
--On Sunday, March 9, 2003 6:48 PM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. If we want to keep our contract with the user about the stable series
valid, this change should go into 2.1 only. Otherwise, users doing a
configure; make; make install or even a config.status could get a
nasty
are we talking about removing modules entirely, or just modifying what's
enabled by default?
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal: Remove mod_imap from default list
20 matches
Mail list logo
