This is uglier than creating a subpool... :)
On Oct 17, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe using the following macros could help to log worker's (full) name when
no pool is available for ap_proxy_worker_name().
Regards,
Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
This is uglier than creating a subpool... :)
Possibly ;) but with the pool being destroyed then...
Regards.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
This is uglier than creating a subpool... :)
Possibly ;) but with the pool being destroyed then...
Something like :
PROXY_DECLARE(char *)
That's why I chose what I did... It's only needed once and
the pool is around. But yeah, it may be better.
On Oct 17, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
This is uglier than creating a subpool... :)
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:10 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Oct 17 14:10:43 2013
New Revision: 1533087
@@ -2087,12 +2089,9 @@ PROXY_DECLARE(int) ap_proxy_acquire_conn
(*conn)-close = 0;
(*conn)-inreslist = 0;
-if (worker-s-uds) {
+if
For sure the (*conn)-pool is recycled more often...
On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:10 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Oct 17 14:10:43 2013
New Revision: 1533087
@@ -2087,12 +2089,9 @@ PROXY_DECLARE(int)
