Re: svn commit: r1686248 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

[William A Rowe Jr]

In some cases, perhaps, but this was objection asked-and-answered so my -1
was void.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM,  wr...@apache.org wrote:
  Author: wrowe
  Date: Thu Jun 18 15:39:53 2015
  New Revision: 1686248
 
  URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1686248
  Log:
  After addressing a defect, don't discuss, this isn't a forum :)
 
  Note the patch is updated, and delete now-irrelevant comments/votes.

 It seems to me that since a -1 needs to be argued, it can't be deleted
 without..

Re: svn commit: r1686248 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

[Yann Ylavic]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM,  wr...@apache.org wrote:
 Author: wrowe
 Date: Thu Jun 18 15:39:53 2015
 New Revision: 1686248

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1686248
 Log:
 After addressing a defect, don't discuss, this isn't a forum :)

 Note the patch is updated, and delete now-irrelevant comments/votes.

It seems to me that since a -1 needs to be argued, it can't be deleted without..