[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2097) Splitting Query example

2015-12-07 Thread Sergey Kozlov (JIRA)
Sergey Kozlov created IGNITE-2097: - Summary: Splitting Query example Key: IGNITE-2097 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2097 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2096) AtomicConfiguration and CollectionConfiguration should be properly checked for consistency

2015-12-07 Thread Valentin Kulichenko (JIRA)
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2096: --- Summary: AtomicConfiguration and CollectionConfiguration should be properly checked for consistency Key: IGNITE-2096 URL:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2098) Need to check that Java Proxy is properly (de)serialized with binary marshaller

2015-12-07 Thread Valentin Kulichenko (JIRA)
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2098: --- Summary: Need to check that Java Proxy is properly (de)serialized with binary marshaller Key: IGNITE-2098 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2098

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2100) Queries do not work with binary marshaller and Externalizable objects

2015-12-07 Thread Valentin Kulichenko (JIRA)
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2100: --- Summary: Queries do not work with binary marshaller and Externalizable objects Key: IGNITE-2100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2100

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2099) Binary marshaller writes any map as a HashMap

2015-12-07 Thread Valentin Kulichenko (JIRA)
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2099: --- Summary: Binary marshaller writes any map as a HashMap Key: IGNITE-2099 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2099 Project: Ignite

Binary marshaller issues

2015-12-07 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
Folks, Based on user's feedback about beta of 1.5, I created several tickets for binary marshaller that should be fixed in the final version. Here is the list: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2098 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2099 -

Re: More query examples

2015-12-07 Thread Sergey Kozlov
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2097 On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > I completely agree. We should make our SQL capabilities more prominent and > visible. Sergey, can you file a ticket for this outlining what changes need >

More query examples

2015-12-07 Thread Sergey Kozlov
Hi Igniters I think queries (SQL) is a killer feature of Ignite. But we still have the example CacheQueryExample where query features provided. What's about to introduce a new package e.g. called org.apache.ignite.examples.query and split org.apache.ignite.examples.datagrid.CacheQueryExample into

Update version for branch ignite-1.5

2015-12-07 Thread Sergey Kozlov
Hi Now we released Apache Ignite 1.5.0-b1 and version in branch ignite-1.5 should changed to 1.5.0-b2 Thoughts? -- Sergey Kozlov

Re: Update version for branch ignite-1.5

2015-12-07 Thread Anton Vinogradov
+1 On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Sergey Kozlov wrote: > Hi > > Now we released Apache Ignite 1.5.0-b1 and version in branch ignite-1.5 > should changed to 1.5.0-b2 > > Thoughts? > > -- > Sergey Kozlov >

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2093) Add support for scan near cache to VisorQueryTask

2015-12-07 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov (JIRA)
Alexey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-2093: Summary: Add support for scan near cache to VisorQueryTask Key: IGNITE-2093 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2093 Project: Ignite

Re: What is jdbc:ignite:cfg ??

2015-12-07 Thread Andrey Gura
Cos, JDBC driver was reworked in order to use Ignite client node instead of Ignite Java client. It gives better performance. So now JDBC dirver uses Ignite xml configuration file using jdbc:ignite:cfg protocol. See documentation for version 1.4 https://apacheignite.readme.io/v1.4/docs/jdbc-driver

Re: Weird releases [Was: EA versioning]

2015-12-07 Thread Anton Vinogradov
It's a test release. I have no clue why it's located at archive dist. It should be removed. Does anybody know how to remove it? On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Forking of the release schema conversation. I have noticed that official > dist >

Re: Ignoring a node as a Service Grid deployment candidate

2015-12-07 Thread Denis Magda
Dmitriy, Agree that your solution sounds better. Created a ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2091 Is there anyone in the community who can pick it up and fix the issue during the nearest month? -- Denis On 12/7/2015 8:08 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: I don’t think that

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2090) .Net: EventsTest.TestSerialization fails

2015-12-07 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn (JIRA)
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2090: --- Summary: .Net: EventsTest.TestSerialization fails Key: IGNITE-2090 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2090 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

Re: AWS Tests on TeamCity

2015-12-07 Thread Artem Shutak
Igniters (especially Anton and Raul), Can someone shed a lite on the status of AWS build on TC? Presently all tests fail with The AWS Access Key Id you provided does not exist in our records. What does this mean? Someone configured the build with wrong ID? Can we just fix it? Or AWS account

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2019 Fixed schema import on Mac OSX El...

2015-12-07 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/292 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2089 replaced block callout info to st...

2015-12-07 Thread Dmitriyff
GitHub user Dmitriyff opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/298 IGNITE-2089 replaced block callout info to static data for templates You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Dmitriyff/ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2065 portable -> binary renaming

2015-12-07 Thread ashutakGG
GitHub user ashutakGG opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/299 IGNITE-2065 portable -> binary renaming https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2065 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2092) Ignite does not recognize the right number of CPU cores when running under Docker

2015-12-07 Thread Denis Magda (JIRA)
Denis Magda created IGNITE-2092: --- Summary: Ignite does not recognize the right number of CPU cores when running under Docker Key: IGNITE-2092 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2092

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2094) building the project with 'install' crashes on Mesos module

2015-12-07 Thread Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)
Konstantin Boudnik created IGNITE-2094: -- Summary: building the project with 'install' crashes on Mesos module Key: IGNITE-2094 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2094 Project:

Re: [CLOSE] [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.5.0-b1

2015-12-07 Thread Sergey Kozlov
Hi. Apache Ignite 1.5.0-b1 and its maven staging URL have been released: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ignite/1.5.0-b1/ On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Correction: the release has 6 binding votes, not 7. Alexey Kuznetsov is not >

Is there any plan to build an ignite web console ?

2015-12-07 Thread Ken Cheng
Is there any plan to build an ignite web console? The similar web application as hazcalst. Thanks, kcheng

Re: Is there any plan to build an ignite web console ?

2015-12-07 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Ken, we already working on it. See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-843 Sources will be released in ignite-1.6 Also we have beta-version with hosting sponsored by GridGain: console.gridgain.com On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Ken Cheng wrote: > Is there any

Re: What is jdbc:ignite:cfg ??

2015-12-07 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Andrey Gura wrote: > Cos, > > sepcifies configuration file for Ignite client node that will > be started during connection establishing by JDBC driver. So this file > should be available for JDBC driver client. > Andrey, should this be

Re: Weird releases [Was: EA versioning]

2015-12-07 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:56PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote: > It's a test release. > I have no clue why it's located at archive dist. > It should be removed. > > Does anybody know how to remove it? I think the only way to remove something from archive is by asking infra@ to do so. Either by a

Re: Update version for branch ignite-1.5

2015-12-07 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
If the version is still under development it should be changed to 1.5.0-b2-SNAPSHOT Cos On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:03PM, Sergey Kozlov wrote: > Hi > > Now we released Apache Ignite 1.5.0-b1 and version in branch ignite-1.5 > should changed to 1.5.0-b2 > > Thoughts? > > -- > Sergey Kozlov

Re: What is jdbc:ignite:cfg ??

2015-12-07 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
Thanks Andrey! Still a bit unclear: the doc says " is required and represents any valid URL which points to Ignite configuration file" So, that's server side URL then, something like jdbc:ignite:cfg:///etc/ignite/conf/default-config.xml assuming that server nodes have said configuration

Re: What is jdbc:ignite:cfg ??

2015-12-07 Thread Andrey Gura
Cos, sepcifies configuration file for Ignite client node that will be started during connection establishing by JDBC driver. So this file should be available for JDBC driver client. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Thanks Andrey! > > Still a bit

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2095) SpringCacheManager doesn't support withKeepBinary() flag

2015-12-07 Thread Valentin Kulichenko (JIRA)
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2095: --- Summary: SpringCacheManager doesn't support withKeepBinary() flag Key: IGNITE-2095 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2095 Project:

NearCacheConfiguration extends MutableConfiguration

2015-12-07 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
Folks, I just noticed that NearCacheConfiguration class extends JCache's MutableConfiguration. This means that it inherits properties like writeThrough, readThrough, etc., which doesn't look right to me. Was it done on purpose? Does anyone know the reason? -Val