Excellent work Jim, thanks for leading the charge on our first Apache
release. Hopefully the next steps go smoothly.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jim Apple wrote:
> You can follow the release vote in the IPMC by following the thread at
> gene...@incubator.apache.org.
You can follow the release vote in the IPMC by following the thread at
gene...@incubator.apache.org. You can either subscribe to that list by
sending mail to general-subscribe@ or you can follow it on the web at:
The vote passed:
+1 (binding):
Tom White
Tim Armstrong
Matthew Jacobs
Henry Robinson
Juan Yu
+1 (non-binding)
Jim Apple
I will now ask the Incubator PMC to allow us to release, so this
release is not official yet.
+1 (binding)
Checked signature and checksums, verified the source tag
matches the tarball, and run jenkins against RC3, tests passed.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Ran tests on private infra
> Checked signatures and hashes
>
> On
+1 (binding)
Ran tests on private infra
Checked signatures and hashes
On 26 September 2016 at 07:45, Matthew Jacobs wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple wrote:
> > OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple wrote:
> OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
> patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
>
> Please vote today!
>
> P.S. It looks like our other
OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
Please vote today!
P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
the Incubator PMC:
72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
Tom
On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple" wrote:
> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through
+1 (binding) I was able to run all the tests, build it locally, and use
Apache rat to audit the code. nice work!
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Tim Armstrong
wrote:
> I was able to build and run locally but I'm waiting for a longer test run
> to finishing before
I was able to build and run locally but I'm waiting for a longer test run
to finishing before giving +1
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jim Apple wrote:
> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are
It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
the PMC)
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for
+1 (non-binding)
I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> headers, checked there
+1
I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
and built from source.
BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
release candidate 3.
The artifacts for testing are here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
14 matches
Mail list logo