Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-27 Thread Tim Armstrong
Excellent work Jim, thanks for leading the charge on our first Apache release. Hopefully the next steps go smoothly. On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jim Apple wrote: > You can follow the release vote in the IPMC by following the thread at > gene...@incubator.apache.org.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-27 Thread Jim Apple
You can follow the release vote in the IPMC by following the thread at gene...@incubator.apache.org. You can either subscribe to that list by sending mail to general-subscribe@ or you can follow it on the web at:

[RESULT] [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-27 Thread Jim Apple
The vote passed: +1 (binding): Tom White Tim Armstrong Matthew Jacobs Henry Robinson Juan Yu +1 (non-binding) Jim Apple I will now ask the Incubator PMC to allow us to release, so this release is not official yet.

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-26 Thread Juan
+1 (binding) Checked signature and checksums, verified the source tag matches the tarball, and run jenkins against RC3, tests passed. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Henry Robinson wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran tests on private infra > Checked signatures and hashes > > On

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-26 Thread Henry Robinson
+1 (binding) Ran tests on private infra Checked signatures and hashes On 26 September 2016 at 07:45, Matthew Jacobs wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple wrote: > > OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-26 Thread Matthew Jacobs
+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple wrote: > OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification > patch to our bylaws about weekend voting: > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/ > > Please vote today! > > P.S. It looks like our other

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-26 Thread Jim Apple
OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification patch to our bylaws about weekend voting: https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/ Please vote today! P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on the Incubator PMC:

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-24 Thread Tom White
72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes. I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one Tom On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple" wrote: > It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-23 Thread Tim Armstrong
+1 (binding) I was able to run all the tests, build it locally, and use Apache rat to audit the code. nice work! On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Tim Armstrong wrote: > I was able to build and run locally but I'm waiting for a longer test run > to finishing before

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-23 Thread Tim Armstrong
I was able to build and run locally but I'm waiting for a longer test run to finishing before giving +1 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jim Apple wrote: > It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding > votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-23 Thread Jim Apple
It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of the PMC) On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-23 Thread Jim Apple
+1 (non-binding) I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White wrote: > +1 > > I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license > headers, checked there

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-23 Thread Tom White
+1 I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files, and built from source. BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has

[VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-22 Thread Jim Apple
This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0 release candidate 3. The artifacts for testing are here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/ They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099