Re: [DISCUSS] Removal of Llama support in next (2.8?) release of Impala
+1 On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Matthew Jacobs wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Marcel Kornacker > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Alex Behm > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Henry Robinson > > wrote: > > > > > >> Impala's support for Llama, which adapts Yarn for low-latency query > > >> engines, has long since bitrotted, and never worked very well. I > propose > > >> removing it from the next version of Impala - I don't know of any > > >> deployments relying on its use. > > >> > > >> The initial patch is here: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/4445 > > >> > > >> If there's any discussion to be had, let's do it here. > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> Henry > > >> > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Removal of Llama support in next (2.8?) release of Impala
+1 On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Marcel Kornacker wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Alex Behm wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Henry Robinson > wrote: > > > >> Impala's support for Llama, which adapts Yarn for low-latency query > >> engines, has long since bitrotted, and never worked very well. I propose > >> removing it from the next version of Impala - I don't know of any > >> deployments relying on its use. > >> > >> The initial patch is here: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/4445 > >> > >> If there's any discussion to be had, let's do it here. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Henry > >> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Removal of Llama support in next (2.8?) release of Impala
+1 On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Alex Behm wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > >> Impala's support for Llama, which adapts Yarn for low-latency query >> engines, has long since bitrotted, and never worked very well. I propose >> removing it from the next version of Impala - I don't know of any >> deployments relying on its use. >> >> The initial patch is here: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/4445 >> >> If there's any discussion to be had, let's do it here. >> >> Thanks! >> Henry >>
Re: [DISCUSS] Removal of Llama support in next (2.8?) release of Impala
+1 On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Impala's support for Llama, which adapts Yarn for low-latency query > engines, has long since bitrotted, and never worked very well. I propose > removing it from the next version of Impala - I don't know of any > deployments relying on its use. > > The initial patch is here: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/4445 > > If there's any discussion to be had, let's do it here. > > Thanks! > Henry >