+ 1
jincheng sun 于2020年1月24日 周五下午12:33写道:
> I would like to bring up a VOTE mail to make the final decision If there no
> objections.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
> -
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121
> -
>
>
> jincheng sun 于2020年1月17日周五 上午10:39
Hi,
+1 for a vote
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "jincheng sun"
> 发送时间: 2020-01-24 12:32:22 (星期五)
> 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Add the components definition in JIRA template
>
I would like to bring up a VOTE mail to make the final decision If there no
objections.
What do you think?
Best,
Jincheng
-
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121
-
jincheng sun 于2020年1月17日周五 上午10:39写道:
> Great thanks for adding more relationship info about `Merge
Great thanks for adding more relationship info about `Merge` and
`Storage`. @Xiangdong !
As :
> (now query engine is in the storage engine..) Merge is a submodule of
storage engine and query engine.
I think `query engine` and `storage engine` is make sense to me. Here only
a suggestion that how
Hi,
Thanks jincheng and jialin.
Sorry for absence of the discussion because of busy work these days..
Some comments:
> Core
> Core/TsFile
> Core/Merge
> Core/Storage
> Core/WAL
Not so clearly.. maybe TsFile, WAL, Storage Engine, Query Engine? (now
query engine is in the storage engine..)
Merg
Hi Jincheng,
Thank you! Looks good :)
jincheng sun 于2020年1月16日周四 下午4:01写道:
> Thanks for your explanation! @Jialin
>
> I thought about the composition of our components from the external system,
> the user level, to the IoTDB bottom-level implementation to the auxiliary
> tools, and I adjusted a
Thanks for your explanation! @Jialin
I thought about the composition of our components from the external system,
the user level, to the IoTDB bottom-level implementation to the auxiliary
tools, and I adjusted a little based on yours. as follows:
1. --Connectors-
Connectors components
Hi,
WAL has an independent physical layout that has nothing to do with TsFile.
It is used in the writing process and recovering in IoTDB.
It could be merged into Storage components.
I'm not sure whether I leave out some components, so I add an Other and
therefore can not give an example...
Thank
Sorry for the late reply, I just came back from team outing.
Thanks for adding more detail information. I have two questions then:
- Is WAL a write strategy for TsFlie, can WAL be incorporated into other
components and what is the reason for being a separate component?
- Can you give an example o
Hi,
Sure, maybe a bit more...
- TsFile : A columnar file format that has flexible schema and data
management for time series.
- Storage : The storage engine of IoTDB, including writing to memtable
(buffer), flushing, system recovery, and memtable management.
- Query : The query process in I
Hi,
@Xiangdong thank you for helping to clarify my original intention. you are
right, I really want to list some components to let users choose which
component the given issue belongs to.
@Jialin I think approach 4 would be more meaningful for IoTDB. Could you
please add the detailed description
> No that is not the Apache Way. No one should be in charge of an area
I think Jincheng's mean is, we can list some components to let users
choose which component the given issue belongs to.
As for which components should be listed, we need to have a discussion.
> No one should be in charge of
> No that is not the Apache Way. No one should be in charge of an area.
Oh, great thanks for correcting me Justin, maybe it's my language
expression problems. I mean some contributors and committers will be very
interested in some components, then spend more time, and be more familiar
with the cod
Hi,
Attaching a component of each issue will help contributors quickly locate
the problem.
This has nothing to do with specifying someone in a certain area, it just a
classification of issues :)
I would like to give an approach 4
- TsFile (module: tsfile)
- Storage (StorageEngine in server m
Hi,
> When our community grows stronger, each\ module may have some specific person
> in charge.
No that is not the Apache Way. No one should be in charge of an area.
Thanks,
Justin
15 matches
Mail list logo