[GitHub] jena issue #151: JENA-576: Moving away from deprecated HttpCommons Client AP...

2016-07-10 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/151 I'm imagining a bag of new methods in `HttpOp` similar to what's there now, with the additional `HttpContext` param, and the methods that are now there would call through those new methods with `null`

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-576) Upgrade Apache HTTP Client to 4.3

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369622#comment-15369622 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-576: - Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1090) Add transaction handling convenience code

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369638#comment-15369638 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1090: -- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #153: JENA-1090: Txn - a java8-centric transaction API

2016-07-10 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/153#discussion_r70181662 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/system/ThreadTxn.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-576) Upgrade Apache HTTP Client to 4.3

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369641#comment-15369641 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-576: - Github user fpservant commented on the issue:

[GitHub] jena issue #139: JSON-LD output

2016-07-10 Thread fpservant
Github user fpservant commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/139 Andy > Apologies that this has taken so long. no problem, really. Thanks for this answer. Give me some time to take all your valuable comments into account. just one remark: > I

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-576) Upgrade Apache HTTP Client to 4.3

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369515#comment-15369515 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-576: - Github user afs commented on the issue:

[GitHub] jena issue #151: JENA-576: Moving away from deprecated HttpCommons Client AP...

2016-07-10 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/151 What would a sidecar parameter look like in this situation? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] jena issue #139: JSON-LD output

2016-07-10 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/139 Apologies that this has taken so long. > TODO some documentation. Where should it be added? The best form would be small sample code. Examples can go in

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-626) SPARQL Query Caching

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369518#comment-15369518 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-626: - Github user afs commented on the issue:

[GitHub] jena issue #95: JENA-626 SPARQL Query Caching

2016-07-10 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/95 Another use case: In my day-job, we have a local (same JVM) database because calling to a remote database (even same datacenter) is too expensive. RDF is used to drive the UI for HTTP/HTML

[GitHub] jena issue #139: JSON-LD output

2016-07-10 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/139 JIRA created to track this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1208 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1208) Provide controls for JSON-LD output

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369529#comment-15369529 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1208: -- Github user afs commented on the issue:

Re: [DRAFT] Jena board report for July.

2016-07-10 Thread Andy Seaborne
Thanks for the comments. Report submitted (with 3.10->3.1.0!) Andy

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1090) Add transaction handling convenience code

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369660#comment-15369660 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1090: -- Github user afs commented on the issue:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1090) Add transaction handling convenience code

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369675#comment-15369675 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1090: -- Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:

[GitHub] jena issue #153: JENA-1090: Txn - a java8-centric transaction API

2016-07-10 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/153 We usually use `try-finally` for the transaction cycle, i.e. ``` try { transactionalThing.begin(readWrite); //do some stuff transactionalThing.commit(); // if a write

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1090) Add transaction handling convenience code

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369676#comment-15369676 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1090: -- Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:

[GitHub] jena issue #95: JENA-626 SPARQL Query Caching

2016-07-10 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/95 So the caching in this scenario, @afs, would be handled by `QueryEngineHTTP`/`QueryExecutionBase`? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-626) SPARQL Query Caching

2016-07-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15369679#comment-15369679 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-626: - Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: