[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1590) Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)

2018-08-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16577339#comment-16577339
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1590:
--

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/460


> Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)
> 
>
> Key: JENA-1590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590
> Project: Apache Jena
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ARQ
>Affects Versions: Jena 3.8.0
>Reporter: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Assignee: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.9.0
>
>
> RDFWriter#output(String) appears to have a bug in the two if statements. 
> Sending a pull request to fix it (though in theory the second if won't 
> happen... it's still better to keep the defensive programming IMO)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1590) Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)

2018-08-11 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16577338#comment-16577338
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1590:
---

Commit 0216a8cf533b1b3dffb4196c5af8b63a3acacadd in jena's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=0216a8c ]

Merge branch 'JENA-1590'


> Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)
> 
>
> Key: JENA-1590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590
> Project: Apache Jena
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ARQ
>Affects Versions: Jena 3.8.0
>Reporter: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Assignee: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.9.0
>
>
> RDFWriter#output(String) appears to have a bug in the two if statements. 
> Sending a pull request to fix it (though in theory the second if won't 
> happen... it's still better to keep the defensive programming IMO)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1590) Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)

2018-08-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16577336#comment-16577336
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1590:
--

Github user kinow commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/460
  
Merging (amended my e-mail in the commit, replacing the no-reply from 
GitHub by my apache.org one)


> Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)
> 
>
> Key: JENA-1590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590
> Project: Apache Jena
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ARQ
>Affects Versions: Jena 3.8.0
>Reporter: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Assignee: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.9.0
>
>
> RDFWriter#output(String) appears to have a bug in the two if statements. 
> Sending a pull request to fix it (though in theory the second if won't 
> happen... it's still better to keep the defensive programming IMO)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1590) Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)

2018-08-11 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16577337#comment-16577337
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1590:
---

Commit a770191715664d2410b100692d778cf3b304f454 in jena's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=a770191 ]

JENA-1590: fix if statement in RDFWriter#output


> Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)
> 
>
> Key: JENA-1590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590
> Project: Apache Jena
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ARQ
>Affects Versions: Jena 3.8.0
>Reporter: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Assignee: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.9.0
>
>
> RDFWriter#output(String) appears to have a bug in the two if statements. 
> Sending a pull request to fix it (though in theory the second if won't 
> happen... it's still better to keep the defensive programming IMO)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1590) Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)

2018-08-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16577174#comment-16577174
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1590:
--

GitHub user kinow opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/460

JENA-1590: fix if statement in RDFWriter#output

Eclipse alerted for some Dead code in this class, and after having a look, 
I thought we actually had to check the `lang` in the second `if`, not `ct`?

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/kinow/jena JENA-1590

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/460.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #460


commit 88edbdbeb305e8f4a9a37f2f2299d1699dde149f
Author: Bruno P. Kinoshita 
Date:   2018-08-11T12:49:59Z

JENA-1590: fix if statement in RDFWriter#output




> Fix if statement in RDFWriter#output(String)
> 
>
> Key: JENA-1590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1590
> Project: Apache Jena
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ARQ
>Affects Versions: Jena 3.8.0
>Reporter: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Assignee: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.9.0
>
>
> RDFWriter#output(String) appears to have a bug in the two if statements. 
> Sending a pull request to fix it (though in theory the second if won't 
> happen... it's still better to keep the defensive programming IMO)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)