Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Manikumar Reddy

Congrats Manikumar! On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:17 PM Dong Lin wrote: > > Congratulations Manikumar!! > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:39 AM Jason Gustafson wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Manikumar Reddy as a committer and we > > are > > pleased to announce that he

Re: Java cluster vs Scala cluster

Hi, These 2 classes have the same name but are serving different purposes - Cluster.java is part of the public Java API [0] and allows to build a representation of a Kafka Cluster including brokers, topics and partitions. - Cluster.scala is an internal class only used by the old and now deprecate

Re: [VOTE] KIP-380: Detect outdated control requests and bounced brokers using broker generation

+1( non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Sun, Oct 21, 2018, 03:31 Harsha Chintalapani wrote: > +1(binding). LGTM. > -Harsha > On Oct 20, 2018, 4:49 PM -0700, Dong Lin , wrote: > > Thanks much for the KIP Patrick. Looks pretty good. > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:17 AM Pat

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-351: Add --under-min-isr option to describe topics command

It might be worth syncing with KIP-377 which is already planning to make TopicCommand use the AdminClient and add a --bootstrap-server argument. Also in the proposed changes section, you mention the challenge of finding the topic min ISR configuration. Using the AdminClient.describeConfigs() API,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-377: TopicCommand to use AdminClient

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:28 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-377: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-377%3A+TopicCommand+to+use+AdminClient. > > Summary: > The KIP basically proposes to add --bo

Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 RC0

+1 (non-binding) - Checked signatures - Ran through quickstart on kafka_2.12-2.0.1.tgz - Built from source with Java 8 On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:13 AM Satish Duggana wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > - Ran testAll/releaseTarGzAll on 2.0.1 > - Ran through quickstart of core/streams on builds generated

Re: [VOTE] KIP-374: Add '--help' option to all available Kafka CLI commands

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:16 AM Becket Qin wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding). > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM Harsha Chintalapani wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > -Harsha > > On Nov 11, 2018, 3:49 PM -0800, Daniele Ascione , > > wrote: > > > +1

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Kafka 2.1.0

athanskrzypek, Jun Rao, Kamal > Chandraprakash, Kevin Lafferty, Kevin Lu, Koen De Groote, Konstantine > Karantasis, lambdaliu, Lee Dongjin, Lincong Li, Liquan Pei, lucapette, > Lucas Wang, Maciej Bryński, Magesh Nandakumar, Manikumar Reddy, Manikumar > Reddy O, Mario Molina, Marko Stankovi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Kafka 2.1.0

g, Guozhang Wang, hashangayasri, huxi, huxihx, Ismael Juma, > > Jagadesh Adireddi, Jason Gustafson, Jim Galasyn, Jimin Hsieh, Jimmy Casey, > > Joan Goyeau, John Roesler, Jon Lee, jonathanskrzypek, Jun Rao, Kamal > > Chandraprakash, Kevin Lafferty, Kevin Lu, Koen De Groote

Re: [VOTE] KIP-351: Add --under-min-isr option to describe TopicCommand

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:32 PM Kevin Lu wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm bumping this thread as it has been a couple weeks with no activity. > > The proposed changes in this KIP are minor, but are extremely helpful for > operators to immediately identify partitions

[DISCUSS] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

Hi, I've written a KIP to add commit/list offsets operation to the AdminClient: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=97551484 Please take a look and let me know if you have any feedback. Thanks Mickael

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-201: Rationalising Policy interfaces

Hi Tom, This is a very interesting KIP. If you are not going to continue working on it, would it be ok for us to grab it and complete it? Thanks On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:06 PM Anna Povzner wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > Just wanted to check what you think about the comments I made in my last > message.

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-392: Allow consumers to fetch from the closest replica

Hi Jason, Very cool KIP! A couple of questions: - I'm guessing the selector will be invoke after each rebalance so every time the consumer is assigned a partition it will be able to select it. Is that true? - From the selector API, I'm not sure how the consumer will be able to address some of the

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

o Comar > > IBM Event Streams > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > > > > > From: Mickael Maison > To: dev > Date: 30/11/2018 10:51 > Subject:[DISCUSS] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to > AdminClient > > > > Hi, > > I

Re: what happens when a vote ends with no votes?

A vote must stay open for _at least_ 72 hours to ensure people have a chance to see it. Apart from that these's no upper bound for the duration, some vote threads are open for weeks On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:29 PM Harsha wrote: > > Hi, >It might have slipped through. You can try calling ou

[DISCUSS] KIP-409: Allow creating under-replicated topics and partitions

Hi, We have submitted a KIP to handle topics and partitions creation when a cluster is not fully available: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-409%3A+Allow+creating+under-replicated+topics+and+partitions As always, we welcome feedback and suggestions. Thanks Mickael and Edoar

Re: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] KIP-382 MirrorMaker 2.0

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Ryanne On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:47 AM McCaig, Rhys wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). Fantastic work on the KIP Ryanne. > > > On Dec 25, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Stephane Maarek > > wrote: > > > > +1 ! Great stuff > > > > Stephane > > > > On Mon., 24 Dec. 2018, 12:07 pm Edoardo Comar

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

It's now been a few weeks without any feedback. If I don't see anything new, I'll start a vote early next week. Thanks On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:00 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback Edo. > > 1) While the initial name was matching the Protocol, I a

[VOTE] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

Hi all, I'd like to start the vote on KIP-396: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=97551484 Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-409: Allow creating under-replicated topics and partitions

Hi, We've not received any feedback yet on this KIP. We still believe this would be a nice improvement. Thanks On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:27 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > > Hi, > > We have submitted a KIP to handle topics and partitions creation when > a cluster is not fully

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vahid Hashemian

Congratulations Vahid! Well done! On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:42 AM Dongjin Lee wrote: > > Congratulations, Vahid!! > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:32 PM Dong Lin wrote: > > > Congratulations Vahid! > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:45 PM Jason Gustafson > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > The

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-402: Improve fairness in SocketServer processors

+1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:47 PM vcgat...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On 2018/12/11 10:48:02, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have submitted a KIP to improve fairness in channel processing in > > SocketServer to protect brokers from connection storms:

Re: [VOTE] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

ndl wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, sounds very helpful > > Best regards > > Patrik > > > > > Am 08.01.2019 um 18:10 schrieb Mickael Maison > >: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to s

Re: [VOTE] KIP-282: Add the listener name to the authentication context

Bumping as it still needs a few votes =) On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Mickael Maison wrote: > I've updated the KIP to simply expose the String value instead of the > full ListenerName object. > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Mickael Maison > wrote: >> Thanks f

Re: [VOTE] KIP-294 - Enable TLS hostname verification by default

+1, thanks for the KIP! On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Rajini Sivaram > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Since there have been no objections on this straightforward KIP, I would >> like to initiate the voting process. KIP-294 proposes to use a sec

Re: [VOTE] KIP-266: Add TimeoutException for KafkaConsumer#position

+1 (non binding) Thanks On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > Hi Richard, Thanks for the KIP. > > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > > Rajini > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > >> +1 from me, thanks! >> >> >> Guozhang >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Ja

Re: [VOTE] KIP-278: Add version option to Kafka's commands

+1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > Sasaki, > > I believe this has 2 binding votes and six non-binding votes, so needs > another binding vote to pass. > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Sasaki Toru > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This KIP w

Re: [VOTE] KIP-282: Add the listener name to the authentication context

KIP, +1 (binding). > > Ismael > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:52 AM Mickael Maison > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There has been no objections in the DISCUSS thread so I'd like to >> start a vote on KIP-282: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/co

Re: [VOTE] KIP-255: OAuth Authentication via SASL/OAUTHBEARER

Thanks for the KIP, +1 (non binding) On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:51 AM, Ron Dagostino wrote: > Hi Jun. I think you are getting at the fact that OAuth 2 is a flexible > framework that allows different installations to do things differently. It > is true that the principal name in Kafka could come

Re: [VOTE] 1.1.1 RC0

+1 (non-binding) Using kafka_2.12-1.1.1.tgz, I ran quick start and checked signatures On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Manikumar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) Ran test, Verified quick start, producer/consumer perf > tests > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:58 AM zhenya Sun wrote: > >> +1 non-binding

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 1.1.1 RC1

+1 non-binding Ran quick start and checked signatures On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Dong Lin wrote: > Thank you all for your test and votes! > > It will be great to have more votes from PMC so that we can conclude > kafka-1.1.1 release :)

Re: [VOTE] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction

+1 (non binding). Thanks for the KIP! On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > Hi Luis, > > Regarding the minor suggest, I agree it would be better to make it as > mandatory, but it might be a bit tricky because it is a conditional > mandatory one depending on the other config's v

Re: [VOTE] KIP-322: Return new error code for DeleteTopics API when topic deletion disabled.

+1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > --Vahid > > > > From: Gwen Shapira > To: dev > Date: 07/03/2018 08:49 AM > Subject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-322: Return new error code for DeleteTopics > API when topic dele

Re: [VOTE] 2.0.0 RC1

+1 (non-binding) Ran tests and quickstart using kafka_2.12-2.0.0.tgz with Java 8 Thanks On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Manikumar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) Verified the release notes, src, binary artifacts, Ran > the test suite, > Verified quick start, Ran producer/consumer perf test, log com

Re: [VOTE] 2.0.0 RC2

+1 non-binding Built from source, ran tests, ran quickstart and check signatures Thanks! On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote: > +1 (non-binbding) ... I built the RC2 from source, run tests and used it > with several of my applications without any problems. > > Thanks & Regards

Re: CVE-2018-1288: Authenticated Kafka clients may interfere with data replication

Kafka users should upgrade to one of the following versions where > this vulnerability has been fixed. > > 0.10.2.2 or higher > 0.11.0.3 or higher > 1.0.1 or higher > 1.1.0 or higher > > > > Acknowledgements: > > We would like to thank Edoardo Comar and Mickael Maison for reporting this > issue and providing a resolution. > > > > Regards, > > > Rajini

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Kafka 2.0.0 Released

Blake Miller, >> >> Boyang Chen, cburroughs, Chia-Ping Tsai, Chris Egerton, Colin P. Mccabe, >> >> Colin Patrick McCabe, ConcurrencyPractitioner, Damian Guy, dan norwood, >> >> Daniel Shuy, Daniel Wojda, Dark, David Glasser, Debasish Ghosh, Detharon, >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-351: Add --critical-partitions option to describe topics command

What about also adding a --under-minisr-partitions option? That would match the "kafka.server:type=ReplicaManager,name=UnderMinIsrPartitionCount" broker metric and it's usually pretty relevant when investigating issues On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Kevin Lu wrote: > Hi friends! > > This thread

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Matthias J. Sax

Congratulations Matthias ! On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Paolo Patierno wrote: > Congratulations Matthias ! Very well deserved ! > > From: Guozhang Wang > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 11:59:21 PM > To: dev@kafka.apache.org; us...@kafka.apache.org > Subject:

Re: [VOTE] KIP-229: DeleteGroups API

+1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > Hi Vahid, > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP. > > Regards, > > Rajini > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Edoardo Comar wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) - thanks Vahid >> >> -

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Kafka PMC Member: Rajini Sivaram

Congratulations Rajini ! On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Paolo Patierno wrote: > Congratulations Rajini ! > > > From: Sriram Subramanian > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:01 PM > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Kafka PMC Member: Rajini

Re: [VOTE] KIP-222 - Add "describe consumer group" to KafkaAdminClient

+1 (non binding), thanks On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:41 PM, Colin McCabe wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Colin > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018, at 07:36, Ted Yu wrote: >> +1 >> Original message From: Bill Bejeck >> Date: 1/18/18 6:59 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: >>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-227: Introduce Fetch Requests that are Incremental to Increase Partition Scalability

I'm late to the party but +1 and thanks for the KIP On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Agreed, Jun. > > Ismael > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > >> Since this is a server side metric, it's probably better to use Yammer Rate >> (which has count) for consist

Re: [VOTE] KIP-201: Rationalising policy interfaces

This vote has been silent for a few weeks now but I think this would be a very useful feature. Did it just slip through busy inboxes or are there reasons why committers have not voted ? On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Tom Bentley wrote: > I have a PR for this (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pu

Re: [VOTE] KIP-206: Add support for UUID serialization and deserialization

+1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Manikumar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Colin McCabe wrote: >> >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > >> > >> >

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.1 RC1

Ran tests from source and quickstart with binaries +1 (non-binding) On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 6:05 AM, Jason Gustafson wrote: > +1. Verified artifacts and ran quickstart. Thanks Ewen! > > -Jason > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Ran quickstart with binarie

Re: [VOTE] KIP-257 - Configurable Quota Management

+1 (non binding), thanks Rajini On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Edoardo Comar wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Rajini > > +1 (non binding) > -- > > Edoardo Comar > > IBM Message Hub > > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > > > > From: Ted Yu > To:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dong Lin

Congratulations Dong! On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Congratulations Dong! Thanks for your contributions so far and looking > forward to future ones. > > Ismael > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, 10:58 Becket Qin, wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> The PMC of Apache Kafka is pleased

Re: [VOTE] KIP-272: Add API version tag to broker's RequestsPerSec metric

+1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Allen Wang wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I would like to start voting for KIP-272: Add API version tag to broker's >> RequestsPerSec metric. >> >> https://cwi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Kafka 1.1.0 Released

; > fredfp, Gavrie Philipson, Gunnar Morling, Guozhang Wang, hmcl, Hugo Louro, > > huxi, huxihx, Igor Kostiakov, Ismael Juma, Ivan Babrou, Jacek Laskowski, > > Jakub Scholz, Jason Gustafson, Jeff Klukas, Jeff Widman, Jeremy > Custenborder, > > Jeyhun Karimov, Jiangjie (Becket)

Kafka Authorizer interface review

Hi all, Over the past few months the IBM Message Hub team has "played quite a bit" with the pluggable Authorizer interface and I'll try to give a summary of our findings. First when implementing a custom Authorizer, we found it hard having a global view of all the Resource/Operation required for

Re: Kafka Authorizer interface review

eers > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Mickael Maison > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Over the past few months the IBM Message Hub team has "played quite a >> bit" with the pluggable Authorizer interface and I'll try to give a >> summary of our

Re: [VOTE] KIP-211: Revise Expiration Semantics of Consumer Group Offsets

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Jason Gustafson wrote: > +1 Thanks Vahid! > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 7:27 PM, James Cheng wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks for all the hard work on this, Vahid! >> >> -James >> >> > On Mar 28, 2018, at 10:34 AM, Vahid

[DISCUSS] KIP-282: Add the listener name to the authentication context

Hi all, I have submitted KIP-282 to add the listener name to the authentication context: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-282%3A+Add+the+listener+name+to+the+authentication+context This is a very minor KIP to simplify identifying the source of a connection instead of relying

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-282: Add the listener name to the authentication context

I have not seen any replies yet =( Considering how minor it is, if there are no objections I'll start a vote in a few days On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Mickael Maison wrote: > Hi all, > > I have submitted KIP-282 to add the listener name to the authentication >

Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018

+1 (non binding), thanks On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Rahul Singh wrote: > +1 > > On Apr 18, 2018, 5:12 PM -0500, Bill Bejeck , wrote: >> +1 >> >> Thanks, >> Bill >> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Edoardo Comar wrote: >> >> > thanks Ismael >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > -

[VOTE] KIP-282: Add the listener name to the authentication context

Hi, There has been no objections in the DISCUSS thread so I'd like to start a vote on KIP-282: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-282%3A+Add+the+listener+name+to+the+authentication+context Thanks

Re: [VOTE] KIP-282: Add the listener name to the authentication context

ink we should > return just a String. > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > >> ListenerName is in an internal package, so we would have to move it before >> exposing it in a public API. >> >> Ismael >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, 01:52 Micka

Re: [VOTE] KIP-282: Add the listener name to the authentication context

I've updated the KIP to simply expose the String value instead of the full ListenerName object. On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Mickael Maison wrote: > Thanks for the heads up Ismael. In that case, I also think it makes > sense to just use the String representation. > > I

Re: [VOTE] KIP-289: Improve the default group id behavior in KafkaConsumer

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Vahid On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:26 AM Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for the KIP. > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:11 PM Stanislav Kozlovski > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks! > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM Jason Gustafson > > wr

Re: [VOTE] KIP-346 - Improve LogCleaner behavior on error

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:53 PM Gwen Shapira wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski > wrote: > > > Hey everybody, > > I'm starting a vote on KIP-346 > > > 346+-+I

Re: [VOTE] KIP-325: Extend Consumer Group Command to Show Beginning Offsets

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Vahid! On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:34 AM Manikumar wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for the KIP. > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:41 AM Satish Duggana > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Satish. > > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 1:45 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > > > > +1 >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Kafka PMC member: Dong Lin

Congratulations Dong! On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:46 PM Manikumar wrote: > > Congrats, Dong Lin! > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM Ismael Juma wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Dong Lin became a committer in March 2018. Since then, he has remained > > active in the community and contributed a n

Re: [VOTE] KIP-357: Add support to list ACLs per principal

+1 (non binding) On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 3:14 PM Manikumar wrote: > > bump up! waiting for 2 more binding votes! > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:36 AM Satish Duggana > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Harsha wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > -Harsha >

Re: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] KIP-158: Kafka Connect should allow source connectors to set topic-specific settings for new topics

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:40 AM McCaig, Rhys wrote: > > Looks great Randall > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Sep 9, 2018, at 7:17 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > > +1 > > Useful improvement, thanks Randall. > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 3:28 PM Randall Hauch wrot

Re: [VOTE] KIP-110: Add Codec for ZStandard Compression

+1 (non binding) Thanks for your perseverance, it's great to see this KIP finally reaching completion! On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:58 AM Harsha wrote: > > +1 (binding). > > Thanks, > Harsha > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote: > > Great contribution! +1 > > > > On Wed, Sep 12

Re: [VOTE] KIP-367 Introduce close(Duration) to Producer and AdminClient instead of close(long, TimeUnit)

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:05 AM Manikumar wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for the KIP. > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:38 AM Harsha wrote: > > > +1 (Binding). > > Thanks, > > Harsha > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 9:06 PM, vito jeng wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-361: Add Consumer Configuration to Disable Auto Topic Creation

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 7:40 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > -Matthias > > On 9/14/18 4:57 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > > > Ismael > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:56 PM Dhruvil Shah wrote: > > > >> Hi all, >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-302 - Enable Kafka clients to use all DNS resolved IP addresses

Bumping this thread It's a relatively small change that would help cloud environments with load balancers fronting brokers On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:01 PM Edoardo Comar wrote: > > Hi all, > after some time we updated KIP-302 to reuse the config key introduced by > KIP-235, with a different value

Re: [VOTE] KIP 368: Allow SASL Connections to Periodically Re-Authenticate

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP, this is a very nice feature. On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:56 PM Stanislav Kozlovski wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP, Ron! > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:26 PM Ron Dagostino wrote: > > > Hi Everyone. This KIP requires 1 more binding up-vote to be

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Colin McCabe

Congratulations Colin! On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 11:17 Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote: > Congrats Colin, well deserved! :) > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:58 AM Stanislav Kozlovski < > stanis...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > Congrats Colin! > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:51 AM Edoardo Comar wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-377: TopicCommand to use AdminClient

Hi Viktor, Thanks for taking this task! This is a very nice change as it will allow users to use this tool in many Cloud environments where direct zookeeper access is not available. On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:34 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote: > > Hi All, > > This is the continuation of the old KI

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-190: Handle client-ids consistently between clients and brokers

entley wrote: > >> Hi Mickael, >> >> I was just wondering why the restriction was imposed for Java clients the >> first place, do you know? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Tom >> >> On 14 September 2017 at 09:16, Ismael Juma wrote: >> >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-201: Rationalising Policy interfaces

Hi Tom, Thanks for the KIP. Is this meant to superseed KIP-170 ? If so, one of our key requirements was to be able to access the topics/partitions list from the policy, so an administrator could enforce a partition limit for example. Also instead of simply having the Java Principal object, could

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-190: Handle client-ids consistently between clients and brokers

e all metrics use the actual values. If so, yes that's an option. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Mickael Maison > wrote: > >> Hi Ewen, >> >> I understand your point of view and ideally we'd ha

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-190: Handle client-ids consistently between clients and brokers

ser principal metrics sanitized as they are today, and then > follow up with another KIP to get all the metrics unsanitized when they hit > the metrics reporter, but for Jmx sanitized as they are today when > characters are encountered that Jmx cannot support. > > -Ewen > > On

Re: [VOTE] KIP-201: Rationalising policy interfaces

Thanks for driving this! +1 (non binding) On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Tom Bentley wrote: > I would like to start a vote on KIP-201, which proposes to replace the > existing policy interfaces with a single new policy interface that also > extends policy support to cover new and existing APIs

Re: Experimenting with Kafka and OpenSSL

Thanks for sharing, very interesting read. Did you get a chance to try JDK 9 ? We also considered using OpenSSL instead of JSSE especially since Netty made an easy to re-use package (netty-tcnative). There was KAFKA-2561 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2561) where people shared a fe

Re: [VOTE] KIP-214: Add zookeeper.max.in.flight.requests config to the broker

+1 (non binding), thanks On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Becket Qin wrote: > +1, Thanks for the KIP. > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Jeff Widman wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks for putting the work in to benchmark various defaults. >> >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Ismael Ju

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Kafka 1.0.0 Released

lities: >> > > >> > > >> > > With these APIs, Kafka can be used for two broad classes of >> application: >> > > >> > > ** Building real-time streaming data pipelines that reliably get data >> > between >> > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Onur Karaman

Congratulations Onur ! On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Congrats!!! > > > On 11/6/17 7:56 PM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: >> Congrats Onur! >> >> --Vahid >> >> >> >> From: Ismael Juma >> To: dev@kafka.apache.org >> Cc: "us...@kafka.apache.org" >> Date: 11/06/201

Re: 0.11 git tags

Have you tried: git fetch --tags ? On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Tom Bentley wrote: > Not when I run `git tag` locally though. > > On 10 November 2017 at 12:44, Ismael Juma wrote: > >> They seem to be there: >> >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/tree/0.11.0.0 >> https://github.com/apache/kaf

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-227: Introduce Incremental FetchRequests to Increase Partition Scalability

That's an interesting idea. In our clusters, we definitively feel the cost of unused partitions and I think it's one of these areas where Kafka could improve. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Jun Rao wrote: > Hi, Jay, > > I guess in your proposal the leader has to cache the last offset given back

Re: [VOTE] KIP-218: Make KafkaFuture.Function java 8 lambda compatible

+1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Tom Bentley wrote: > +1 > > On 8 December 2017 at 18:34, Ted Yu wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Steven Aerts >> wrote: >> >> > Hello everybody, >> > >> > >> > I think KIP-218 is crystallized enough to start

Re: 答复: [VOTE] KIP-223 - Add per-topic min lead and per-partition lead metrics to KafkaConsumer

Sorry to only raise this now, but should we also update the kafka-consumer-groups tool to display the start offset (and possibly the lead) ? Apart from that I'm +1 (non binding) Thanks On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > The by-laws ask for 72 hours only, since the starting o

Re: [VOTE] KIP-237: More Controller Health Metrics

+1 non binding, thanks ! On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Becket Qin wrote: > +1. Thanks for the KIP. > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Manikumar wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks >> >> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Jun Rao wrote: >> >> > Hi, Dong, >> > >> > Thanks for the KIP. +1 >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

do Comar > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > Thanks Mickael! > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 17:39, Patrik Kleindl > > > wrote: &g

Re: [VOTE] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

to explain why this is necessary here > (not saying it isn't). > > Ismael > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 10:29 AM Mickael Maison wrote: > > > Thanks Ryanne for the feedback, all suggestions sounded good, I've > > updated the KIP accordingly. > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-409: Allow creating under-replicated topics and partitions

Another bump. Feedback and suggestions are always appreciated! On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:14 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > > Hi, > > We've not received any feedback yet on this KIP. We still believe this > would be a nice improvement. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Dec 18

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-390: Add producer option to adjust compression level

Thanks, that's a very interesting KIP! I agree with Becket that a clearer config format is likely to help. Have you considered using a config format similar to listeners (as described in the "Updating SSL Keystore of an Existing Listener" in the Kafka docs)? Also worth noting that we already have

Re: [VOTE] 2.1.1 RC2

+1 (non binding) I built from source and ran Quickstart. All good. Thanks Colin On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:43 AM Vahid Hashemian wrote: > > +1 > > I built from the source, and ran the Quickstart on Ubuntu 18.04 with Java 8. > Some unit tests fail for me but none consistently across several runs.

Re: [VOTE] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

Bumping this thread as it's been a couple of weeks. On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:26 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > > Thanks Ismael for the feedback. I think your point has 2 parts: > - Having the reset functionality in the AdminClient: > The fact we have a command line tool ill

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Bill Bejeck

Congratulations Bill! On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 7:52 AM Gurudatt Kulkarni wrote: > Congratulations Bill! > > On Thursday, February 14, 2019, Konstantine Karantasis < > konstant...@confluent.io> wrote: > > Congrats Bill! > > > > -Konstantine > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 8:42 PM Srinivas Reddy <

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Randall Hauch

Congrats Randall! On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 6:37 AM James Cheng wrote: > > Congrats, Randall! Well deserved! > > -James > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 6:16 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > The PMC of Apache Kafka is happy to announce another new committer join

Re: [VOTE] KIP-412: Extend Admin API to support dynamic application log levels

+1 (non-binding) We've used a tweaked JmxTool class to change log level for a while but this is a significant improvement! Thanks for the KIP On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:48 AM Stanislav Kozlovski wrote: > > Hey everybody, I'm starting a VOTE thread for KIP-412. This feature should > significantly

Re: [VOTE] KIP-430 - Return Authorized Operations in Describe Responses

+1 (non binding) In the Metadata v8 section, it looks like the "authorized_operations" field is missing under "topic_metadata". There's only the top-level "authorized_operations" field. On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:11 PM Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > Hi Colin, > > Yes, it makes sense to reduce response

Re: [VOTE] 2.2.0 RC1

+1 I checked signatures, built from source and ran through quickstart It's probably worth mentioning KIP-377 in the short release summary as in many cloud environments access to zookeeper is disabled so many users will benefit from it. Also "- Added SSL support for custom principle name" -> "- Add

Re: [VOTE] KIP-436 Add a metric indicating start time

+1 (non binding) Thanks On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 6:39 AM Satish Duggana wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP, > +1 (non-binding) > > ~Satish. > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:58 PM Manikumar wrote: > > > +1 (binding). > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > Thanks, > > Manikumar > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019

Re: [VOTE] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

Bumping this thread once again Ismael, have I answered your questions? While this has received a few non-binding +1s, no committers have voted yet. If you have concerns or questions, please let me know. Thanks On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:51 AM Mickael Maison wrote: > > Bumping this thr

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-409: Allow creating under-replicated topics and partitions

rom the proposal for now. > > Perhaps we could even somehow do all of this in a custom CreateTopicPolicy? > That would avoid the need for RPC changes, new configuration knobs, etc. > > best, > Colin > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018, at 08:43, Mickael Maison wrote: > > H

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >