Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
I will update that. Thanks David! On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 3:43 AM David Jacot wrote: > I think that adding a configuration makes sense. Could you mention it in > the public interfaces section? Could you also clearly mention the default > value? I suppose that the default value should/will depends on the > performance results that we get. > > Thanks, > David > > Le sam. 18 mars 2023 à 00:53, Justine Olshan > > a écrit : > > > Hey all. I've updated the kip to include a configuration change. This > will > > allow users to disable the verification step. This will be for > > performance-conscious customers who can sacrifice possible hanging > > transactions in order achieve latency goals. > > This is because the second AddPartition call may introduce slightly > slower > > produce requests. I do plan to optimize and make this as fast as > possible, > > but I suspect some folks will want this as an option. > > Of course, the best solution will be to update the clients. But until > that > > is available, we offer the configuration. Let me know if there are any > > questions. > > > > Thanks, > > Justine > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:55 AM Justine Olshan > > wrote: > > > > > Yup -- those are the main changes! > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:44 AM Guozhang Wang < > > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Justine. I checked the diff between the two versions on wiki, > > >> seems the major changes are: > > >> > > >> 1) Move the `verifyOnly` field of the request into each transaction > > >> and hence we no longer have any top-level primitive fields. > > >> 2) Add a top-level `errorCode` field in the response. > > >> > > >> Is that summary right? > > >> > > >> > > >> Guozhang > > >> > > >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:51 PM Justine Olshan > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hey all, > > >> > > > >> > I've updated the KIP to slightly change some of the request and > > response > > >> > specs for AddPartitionsToTxn. Nothing huge, but some points came up > > >> during > > >> > PR review. > > >> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Justine > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:40 AM Justine Olshan > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Thanks everyone! I'm going to close the vote. > > >> > > The KIP is accepted with five binding votes from Jason, Guozhang, > > >> > > Matthias, David (and me), and two non-binding votes from Colt and > > >> Artem. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks again, > > >> > > Justine > > >> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:41 PM David Jacot > > >> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Thanks for the KIP, Justine. +1 (binding) > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:36 AM Matthias J. Sax > > > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Thanks for the KIP! > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > +1 (binding) > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: > > >> > >> > > (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and > > >> fixing > > >> > >> the > > >> > >> > > issues that we've got. > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > -Artem > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang < > > >> > >> > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> > > >> > >> > > wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson > > >> > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> +1. Thanks Justine! > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> -Jason > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy < > > >> c...@littlehorse.io> > > >> > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've > read > > >> it; it > > >> > >> > >> makes > > >> > >> > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Colt McNealy > > >> > >> > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > > >> > >> > wrote: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Hi everyone, > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to > > >> prevent some > > >> > >> > >> of the > > >> > >> > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other > > general > > >> > >> > >> improvements > > >> > >> > > to transactions in Kafka. > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Justine > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
I think that adding a configuration makes sense. Could you mention it in the public interfaces section? Could you also clearly mention the default value? I suppose that the default value should/will depends on the performance results that we get. Thanks, David Le sam. 18 mars 2023 à 00:53, Justine Olshan a écrit : > Hey all. I've updated the kip to include a configuration change. This will > allow users to disable the verification step. This will be for > performance-conscious customers who can sacrifice possible hanging > transactions in order achieve latency goals. > This is because the second AddPartition call may introduce slightly slower > produce requests. I do plan to optimize and make this as fast as possible, > but I suspect some folks will want this as an option. > Of course, the best solution will be to update the clients. But until that > is available, we offer the configuration. Let me know if there are any > questions. > > Thanks, > Justine > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:55 AM Justine Olshan > wrote: > > > Yup -- those are the main changes! > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:44 AM Guozhang Wang < > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Justine. I checked the diff between the two versions on wiki, > >> seems the major changes are: > >> > >> 1) Move the `verifyOnly` field of the request into each transaction > >> and hence we no longer have any top-level primitive fields. > >> 2) Add a top-level `errorCode` field in the response. > >> > >> Is that summary right? > >> > >> > >> Guozhang > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:51 PM Justine Olshan > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hey all, > >> > > >> > I've updated the KIP to slightly change some of the request and > response > >> > specs for AddPartitionsToTxn. Nothing huge, but some points came up > >> during > >> > PR review. > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Justine > >> > > >> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:40 AM Justine Olshan > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Thanks everyone! I'm going to close the vote. > >> > > The KIP is accepted with five binding votes from Jason, Guozhang, > >> > > Matthias, David (and me), and two non-binding votes from Colt and > >> Artem. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks again, > >> > > Justine > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:41 PM David Jacot > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Thanks for the KIP, Justine. +1 (binding) > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:36 AM Matthias J. Sax > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks for the KIP! > >> > >> > > >> > >> > +1 (binding) > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: > >> > >> > > (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and > >> fixing > >> > >> the > >> > >> > > issues that we've got. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > -Artem > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang < > >> > >> > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson > >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> +1. Thanks Justine! > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> -Jason > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy < > >> c...@littlehorse.io> > >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read > >> it; it > >> > >> > >> makes > >> > >> > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Colt McNealy > >> > >> > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Hi everyone, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to > >> prevent some > >> > >> > >> of the > >> > >> > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other > general > >> > >> > >> improvements > >> > >> > > to transactions in Kafka. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Justine > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
Hey all. I've updated the kip to include a configuration change. This will allow users to disable the verification step. This will be for performance-conscious customers who can sacrifice possible hanging transactions in order achieve latency goals. This is because the second AddPartition call may introduce slightly slower produce requests. I do plan to optimize and make this as fast as possible, but I suspect some folks will want this as an option. Of course, the best solution will be to update the clients. But until that is available, we offer the configuration. Let me know if there are any questions. Thanks, Justine On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:55 AM Justine Olshan wrote: > Yup -- those are the main changes! > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:44 AM Guozhang Wang > wrote: > >> Thanks Justine. I checked the diff between the two versions on wiki, >> seems the major changes are: >> >> 1) Move the `verifyOnly` field of the request into each transaction >> and hence we no longer have any top-level primitive fields. >> 2) Add a top-level `errorCode` field in the response. >> >> Is that summary right? >> >> >> Guozhang >> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:51 PM Justine Olshan >> wrote: >> > >> > Hey all, >> > >> > I've updated the KIP to slightly change some of the request and response >> > specs for AddPartitionsToTxn. Nothing huge, but some points came up >> during >> > PR review. >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Justine >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:40 AM Justine Olshan >> wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks everyone! I'm going to close the vote. >> > > The KIP is accepted with five binding votes from Jason, Guozhang, >> > > Matthias, David (and me), and two non-binding votes from Colt and >> Artem. >> > > >> > > Thanks again, >> > > Justine >> > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:41 PM David Jacot >> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Thanks for the KIP, Justine. +1 (binding) >> > >> >> > >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:36 AM Matthias J. Sax >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Thanks for the KIP! >> > >> > >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: >> > >> > > (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and >> fixing >> > >> the >> > >> > > issues that we've got. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > -Artem >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang < >> > >> > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >>> +1. Thanks Justine! >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >>> -Jason >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy < >> c...@littlehorse.io> >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read >> it; it >> > >> > >> makes >> > >> > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. >> > >> > >> > >> > Colt McNealy >> > >> > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Hi everyone, >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to >> prevent some >> > >> > >> of the >> > >> > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general >> > >> > >> improvements >> > >> > > to transactions in Kafka. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Justine >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
Yup -- those are the main changes! On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:44 AM Guozhang Wang wrote: > Thanks Justine. I checked the diff between the two versions on wiki, > seems the major changes are: > > 1) Move the `verifyOnly` field of the request into each transaction > and hence we no longer have any top-level primitive fields. > 2) Add a top-level `errorCode` field in the response. > > Is that summary right? > > > Guozhang > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:51 PM Justine Olshan > wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I've updated the KIP to slightly change some of the request and response > > specs for AddPartitionsToTxn. Nothing huge, but some points came up > during > > PR review. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > > > Thanks, > > Justine > > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:40 AM Justine Olshan > wrote: > > > > > Thanks everyone! I'm going to close the vote. > > > The KIP is accepted with five binding votes from Jason, Guozhang, > > > Matthias, David (and me), and two non-binding votes from Colt and > Artem. > > > > > > Thanks again, > > > Justine > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:41 PM David Jacot > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks for the KIP, Justine. +1 (binding) > > >> > > >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:36 AM Matthias J. Sax > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Thanks for the KIP! > > >> > > > >> > +1 (binding) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: > > >> > > (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and > fixing > > >> the > > >> > > issues that we've got. > > >> > > > > >> > > -Artem > > >> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang < > > >> > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> +1. Thanks Justine! > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> -Jason > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy < > c...@littlehorse.io> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >>> > > >> > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read > it; it > > >> > >> makes > > >> > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > > >> > > > >> > Colt McNealy > > >> > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi everyone, > > >> > > > > >> > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent > some > > >> > >> of the > > >> > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general > > >> > >> improvements > > >> > > to transactions in Kafka. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > >> > > > > >> > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > > >> > > > > >> > > Justine > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
Thanks Justine. I checked the diff between the two versions on wiki, seems the major changes are: 1) Move the `verifyOnly` field of the request into each transaction and hence we no longer have any top-level primitive fields. 2) Add a top-level `errorCode` field in the response. Is that summary right? Guozhang On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:51 PM Justine Olshan wrote: > > Hey all, > > I've updated the KIP to slightly change some of the request and response > specs for AddPartitionsToTxn. Nothing huge, but some points came up during > PR review. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > Thanks, > Justine > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:40 AM Justine Olshan wrote: > > > Thanks everyone! I'm going to close the vote. > > The KIP is accepted with five binding votes from Jason, Guozhang, > > Matthias, David (and me), and two non-binding votes from Colt and Artem. > > > > Thanks again, > > Justine > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:41 PM David Jacot > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks for the KIP, Justine. +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:36 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks for the KIP! > >> > > >> > +1 (binding) > >> > > >> > > >> > On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: > >> > > (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and fixing > >> the > >> > > issues that we've got. > >> > > > >> > > -Artem > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang < > >> > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> +1. Thanks Justine! > >> > >>> > >> > >>> -Jason > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it > >> > >> makes > >> > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > >> > > >> > Colt McNealy > >> > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi everyone, > >> > > > >> > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some > >> > >> of the > >> > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general > >> > >> improvements > >> > > to transactions in Kafka. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > >> > > > >> > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > >> > > > >> > > Justine > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
Hey all, I've updated the KIP to slightly change some of the request and response specs for AddPartitionsToTxn. Nothing huge, but some points came up during PR review. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense Thanks, Justine On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:40 AM Justine Olshan wrote: > Thanks everyone! I'm going to close the vote. > The KIP is accepted with five binding votes from Jason, Guozhang, > Matthias, David (and me), and two non-binding votes from Colt and Artem. > > Thanks again, > Justine > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:41 PM David Jacot > wrote: > >> Thanks for the KIP, Justine. +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:36 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: >> >> > Thanks for the KIP! >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > >> > On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: >> > > (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and fixing >> the >> > > issues that we've got. >> > > >> > > -Artem >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang < >> > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson >> > >> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> +1. Thanks Justine! >> > >>> >> > >>> -Jason >> > >>> >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy >> > >> wrote: >> > >>> >> > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it >> > >> makes >> > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. >> > >> > Colt McNealy >> > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi everyone, >> > > >> > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some >> > >> of the >> > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general >> > >> improvements >> > > to transactions in Kafka. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense >> > > >> > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! >> > > >> > > Justine >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
Thanks everyone! I'm going to close the vote. The KIP is accepted with five binding votes from Jason, Guozhang, Matthias, David (and me), and two non-binding votes from Colt and Artem. Thanks again, Justine On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:41 PM David Jacot wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Justine. +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:36 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: > > > (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and fixing the > > > issues that we've got. > > > > > > -Artem > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang < > > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1. Thanks Justine! > > >>> > > >>> -Jason > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it > > >> makes > > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > > > > Colt McNealy > > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some > > >> of the > > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general > > >> improvements > > > to transactions in Kafka. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > > > > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > > > > > > Justine > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
Thanks for the KIP, Justine. +1 (binding) On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:36 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Thanks for the KIP! > > +1 (binding) > > > On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: > > (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and fixing the > > issues that we've got. > > > > -Artem > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang < > guozhang.wang...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1. Thanks Justine! > >>> > >>> -Jason > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy > >> wrote: > >>> > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it > >> makes > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > > Colt McNealy > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some > >> of the > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general > >> improvements > > to transactions in Kafka. > > > > > > > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > > > > Justine > > > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) On 2/2/23 4:18 PM, Artem Livshits wrote: (non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and fixing the issues that we've got. -Artem On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson wrote: +1. Thanks Justine! -Jason On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy wrote: (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it makes sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. Colt McNealy *Founder, LittleHorse.io* On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan wrote: Hi everyone, I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some of the common causes of hanging transactions and make other general improvements to transactions in Kafka. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! Justine
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
(non-binding) +1. Looking forward to the implementation and fixing the issues that we've got. -Artem On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson > wrote: > > > > +1. Thanks Justine! > > > > -Jason > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy > wrote: > > > > > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it > makes > > > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > > > > > > Colt McNealy > > > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some > of the > > > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general > improvements > > > > to transactions in Kafka. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > > > > > > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > > > > > > > > Justine > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
Thanks Justine, I have no further comments on the KIP. +1. On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jason Gustafson wrote: > > +1. Thanks Justine! > > -Jason > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy wrote: > > > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it makes > > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > > > > Colt McNealy > > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some of the > > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general improvements > > > to transactions in Kafka. > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > > > > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > > > > > > Justine > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
+1. Thanks Justine! -Jason On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:46 PM Colt McNealy wrote: > (non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it makes > sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. > > Colt McNealy > *Founder, LittleHorse.io* > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some of the > > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general improvements > > to transactions in Kafka. > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > > > > Justine > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-890: Transactions Server Side Defense
(non-binding) +1. Thank you for the KIP, Justine! I've read it; it makes sense to me and I am excited for the implementation. Colt McNealy *Founder, LittleHorse.io* On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:46 AM Justine Olshan wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-890 which aims to prevent some of the > common causes of hanging transactions and make other general improvements > to transactions in Kafka. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-890%3A+Transactions+Server-Side+Defense > > Please take a look if you haven't already and vote! > > Justine >
