Re: [dev] [ACTION] Roll Call for Apache LibCloud project PMC members
Hi Shane, I've been a PMC on libcloud since around 2014 (iirc). I continue to support Tomaz and the libcloud community. Kind regards, Eric On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 11:16 AM Shane Curcuru wrote: > While I see the project has made a new release with a bunch of cleaned > up code - excellent news! - the board still wants to confirm that there > are sufficient PMC members who expect to *continue* to be active enough > on the project going forward to deal with potential security issues or > the like. > > It's fine if projects are mostly dormant (as you've noted in reports due > to the nature of the code), but the board would like an explicit > acknowledgement of at least three PMC members here. Folks can either > reply-all here, or you can include an explicit listing of PMC members > who are still active enough in your next report. > > Thanks for all the work, and getting a new release out! > > -- > - Shane Curcuru > Director > On Behalf of the ASF Board of Directors > > On 2023/07/23 20:39:45 Shane Curcuru wrote: > > (Note mixed public/private lists to get whole LibCloud community) > > > > Dear LibCloud PMC members and committers: > > > > The board report for Libcloud was not submitted for this month's board > > meeting or for May, June, or July. This indicates that the project > > might not have enough engaged PMC members to provide proper oversight of > > the project. A review of your mailing lists similarly shows little to > > zero project activity over a period of months. > > > > LibCloud PMC members must respond to this board roll call as noted here: > > > >https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#roll-call > > > > Failing to see at least three active PMC members to provide oversight, > > the board will likely post an announcement that the project will be > > going into the Attic, unless more activity in the project picks up. > > > > Going into the attic is an important step for our users, since that lets > > end users understand that some software is not actively being > > maintained. The attic ensures all project data is maintained read only. > > > >https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#move-to-attic > > > > Thanks for your attention, >
Re: [dev] [ACTION] Roll Call for Apache LibCloud project PMC members
Hi Shane I’m a member of the Libcloud PMC and still review releases and am willing to perform the oversight duties. Anthony :Shaw > On 12 Sep 2023, at 8:34 pm, Tomaz Muraus wrote: > > Shane, > > Thanks for starting a roll call. > > For some reason the email went into spam here and I only noticed it today. > > I will also follow up with other PMC members on private@ to ensure they don't > miss this thread. > > Regards, > Tomaz > > --- Original Message --- >> On Saturday, September 2nd, 2023 at 8:16 PM, Shane Curcuru >> wrote: >> While I see the project has made a new release with a bunch of cleaned >> up code - excellent news! - the board still wants to confirm that there >> are sufficient PMC members who expect to continue to be active enough >> on the project going forward to deal with potential security issues or >> the like. >> It's fine if projects are mostly dormant (as you've noted in reports due >> to the nature of the code), but the board would like an explicit >> acknowledgement of at least three PMC members here. Folks can either >> reply-all here, or you can include an explicit listing of PMC members >> who are still active enough in your next report. >> Thanks for all the work, and getting a new release out! >> -- >> - Shane Curcuru >> Director >> On Behalf of the ASF Board of Directors >> On 2023/07/23 20:39:45 Shane Curcuru wrote: >>> (Note mixed public/private lists to get whole LibCloud community) >>> Dear LibCloud PMC members and committers: >>> The board report for Libcloud was not submitted for this month's board >>> meeting or for May, June, or July. This indicates that the project >>> might not have enough engaged PMC members to provide proper oversight of >>> the project. A review of your mailing lists similarly shows little to >>> zero project activity over a period of months. >>> LibCloud PMC members must respond to this board roll call as noted here: >>> https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#roll-call >>> Failing to see at least three active PMC members to provide oversight, >>> the board will likely post an announcement that the project will be >>> going into the Attic, unless more activity in the project picks up. >>> Going into the attic is an important step for our users, since that lets >>> end users understand that some software is not actively being >>> maintained. The attic ensures all project data is maintained read only. >>> https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#move-to-attic >>> Thanks for your attention,
RE: [dev] [ACTION] Roll Call for Apache LibCloud project PMC members
Shane, Thanks for starting a roll call. For some reason the email went into spam here and I only noticed it today. I will also follow up with other PMC members on private@ to ensure they don't miss this thread. Regards, Tomaz --- Original Message --- On Saturday, September 2nd, 2023 at 8:16 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > > While I see the project has made a new release with a bunch of cleaned > up code - excellent news! - the board still wants to confirm that there > are sufficient PMC members who expect to continue to be active enough > on the project going forward to deal with potential security issues or > the like. > > It's fine if projects are mostly dormant (as you've noted in reports due > to the nature of the code), but the board would like an explicit > acknowledgement of at least three PMC members here. Folks can either > reply-all here, or you can include an explicit listing of PMC members > who are still active enough in your next report. > > Thanks for all the work, and getting a new release out! > > -- > - Shane Curcuru > Director > On Behalf of the ASF Board of Directors > > On 2023/07/23 20:39:45 Shane Curcuru wrote: > > > (Note mixed public/private lists to get whole LibCloud community) > > > > Dear LibCloud PMC members and committers: > > > > The board report for Libcloud was not submitted for this month's board > > meeting or for May, June, or July. This indicates that the project > > might not have enough engaged PMC members to provide proper oversight of > > the project. A review of your mailing lists similarly shows little to > > zero project activity over a period of months. > > > > LibCloud PMC members must respond to this board roll call as noted here: > > > > https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#roll-call > > > > Failing to see at least three active PMC members to provide oversight, > > the board will likely post an announcement that the project will be > > going into the Attic, unless more activity in the project picks up. > > > > Going into the attic is an important step for our users, since that lets > > end users understand that some software is not actively being > > maintained. The attic ensures all project data is maintained read only. > > > > https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#move-to-attic > > > > Thanks for your attention,
RE: [dev] [ACTION] Roll Call for Apache LibCloud project PMC members
While I see the project has made a new release with a bunch of cleaned up code - excellent news! - the board still wants to confirm that there are sufficient PMC members who expect to *continue* to be active enough on the project going forward to deal with potential security issues or the like. It's fine if projects are mostly dormant (as you've noted in reports due to the nature of the code), but the board would like an explicit acknowledgement of at least three PMC members here. Folks can either reply-all here, or you can include an explicit listing of PMC members who are still active enough in your next report. Thanks for all the work, and getting a new release out! -- - Shane Curcuru Director On Behalf of the ASF Board of Directors On 2023/07/23 20:39:45 Shane Curcuru wrote: (Note mixed public/private lists to get whole LibCloud community) Dear LibCloud PMC members and committers: The board report for Libcloud was not submitted for this month's board meeting or for May, June, or July. This indicates that the project might not have enough engaged PMC members to provide proper oversight of the project. A review of your mailing lists similarly shows little to zero project activity over a period of months. LibCloud PMC members must respond to this board roll call as noted here: https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#roll-call Failing to see at least three active PMC members to provide oversight, the board will likely post an announcement that the project will be going into the Attic, unless more activity in the project picks up. Going into the attic is an important step for our users, since that lets end users understand that some software is not actively being maintained. The attic ensures all project data is maintained read only. https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#move-to-attic Thanks for your attention,
[dev] [ACTION] Roll Call for Apache LibCloud project PMC members
(Note mixed public/private lists to get whole LibCloud community) Dear LibCloud PMC members and committers: The board report for Libcloud was not submitted for this month's board meeting or for May, June, or July. This indicates that the project might not have enough engaged PMC members to provide proper oversight of the project. A review of your mailing lists similarly shows little to zero project activity over a period of months. LibCloud PMC members must respond to this board roll call as noted here: https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#roll-call Failing to see at least three active PMC members to provide oversight, the board will likely post an announcement that the project will be going into the Attic, unless more activity in the project picks up. Going into the attic is an important step for our users, since that lets end users understand that some software is not actively being maintained. The attic ensures all project data is maintained read only. https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#move-to-attic Thanks for your attention, -- - Shane Curcuru Director On Behalf of the ASF Board of Directors
