[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057034#comment-13057034
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-2341:
-
Thanks Michał. I'll review it later today and
Good catch yonik!
thanks for fixing this!
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:39 PM, yo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: yonik
Date: Tue Jun 28 21:39:01 2011
New Revision: 1140859
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140859view=rev
Log:
SOLR-2626, LUCENE-2831: fix offset bug in cutover to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057042#comment-13057042
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3175:
-
bq. +1, thanks Simon.
committed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3175:
Attachment: test-core_core_2_duo_2-53GHZ.rtf
I am down to 4 min 36 seconds for ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057050#comment-13057050
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3175:
Down from what time pre-patch?
speed up core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057052#comment-13057052
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3255:
-
I wonder if we could check the latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057057#comment-13057057
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3175:
-
pre-patch and roberts latest commits
Hi,
As part of my work around the new Queries module, I want to clear out
contrib/queries. Some classes will go into modules, others somewhere less
pretty. The most popular class in contrib/queries seems to be MoreLikeThis.
What I'm wondering is where this functionality should go to in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057083#comment-13057083
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2878:
-
Hey Mike,
great to see interest here!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057119#comment-13057119
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-2341:
-
You do like those pesky .toString() calls,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9164/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 1544 lines...]
clover.setup:
clover.info:
[echo]
[echo] Clover not found. Code coverage reports disabled.
[echo]
clover:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-2341.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
explore morfologik integration
It's the Java 1.6 issue -- Morfologik is built with 1.6. I'll revert
for now and re-apply tomorrow or whenever we decide 1.6 is appropriate
for the trunk.
Dawid
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss reopened LUCENE-2341:
-
Needs to wait for official support for 1.6 on the trunk.
explore morfologik integration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2793:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2793.patch
I also removed nocommits from
Wait, this is a module right? Why can't this be build with 1.6?
simon
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
It's the Java 1.6 issue -- Morfologik is built with 1.6. I'll revert
for now and re-apply tomorrow or whenever we decide 1.6 is appropriate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-2341:
Attachment: LUCENE-2341.patch
Final patch for this issue. Needs to wait for 1.6 support.
I'll wait for official 1.6 support -- reopened the issue.
Dawid
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057144#comment-13057144
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3255:
Ahh, good idea Simon! That
Failure to fetch junit's package list yet again... but Hoss is working
on this I think!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-3.x/394/
No tests ran.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057148#comment-13057148
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-3079:
I re-ran the edge case 5M documents, 6.8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057148#comment-13057148
]
Toke Eskildsen edited comment on LUCENE-3079 at 6/29/11 11:02 AM:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/166/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 7581 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3216:
Attachment: LUCENE-3216.patch
this patch converts all docvalue types to index into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057186#comment-13057186
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3255:
Actually, we can do something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3079:
---
Attachment: facet-userguide.pdf
Committed revision 1141060 (3x). Will start the port to trunk.
I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057285#comment-13057285
]
Martijn Laarman commented on SOLR-2553:
---
I created Lucene issue:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/165/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 7065 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3216:
Attachment: LUCENE-3216.patch
I committed the latest patch, this patch is a first sketch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057306#comment-13057306
]
Mike Sokolov commented on LUCENE-2878:
--
bq. there should be only one consumer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057306#comment-13057306
]
Mike Sokolov edited comment on LUCENE-2878 at 6/29/11 3:49 PM:
On Jun 29, 2011, at 16:43, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
By the way, you might want to add a paragraph in that section about
adding the [-framework, Python] flags for building JCC on OS X. I
tripped over that again.
If you send a paragraph to
I hit another gotcha building shared on Ubuntu. I thought I had
setuptools installed. When I built JCC, I got no error message about
patch 43, and the config.py said shared. But the library that got
built was libjcc.a, not libjcc.so.
Turns out that the Ubuntu package python-setuptools isn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057318#comment-13057318
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2565:
---
If this patch applies, I'll commit it.
Prevent
On Jun 29, 2011, at 18:04, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
I hit another gotcha building shared on Ubuntu. I thought I had
setuptools installed. When I built JCC, I got no error message about
patch 43, and the config.py said shared. But the library that got
built was libjcc.a, not
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 29, 2011, at 16:43, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
By the way, you might want to add a paragraph in that section about
adding the [-framework, Python] flags for building JCC on OS X. I
tripped over
I'm building a Java wrapper for the Python regex module, and I'd like to
be able to call the module function escape from Java. It takes a
string and returns a string. But I don't see how I can do that given
the current PythonVM? Some trick with module instantiation, perhaps?
Or does the API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3079:
Attachment: LUCENE-3079_4x_broken.patch
here's a hack patch, tried to quickly move this thing to
: Failure to fetch junit's package list yet again... but Hoss is working
: on this I think!
I posted a straw-man patch, but i haven't relaly had time to seriously
test it on modules/contrib ... and i thik rmuir had some reservations
about putting the stuff in dev-tools ... but if someone is
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Failure to fetch junit's package list yet again... but Hoss is working
: on this I think!
I posted a straw-man patch, but i haven't relaly had time to seriously
test it on modules/contrib ... and i thik rmuir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3079:
Attachment: LUCENE-3079_4x.patch
updated patch, one of the fails was caused by my use of
File leak when IOException occurs during index optimization.
Key: LUCENE-3258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Put everything into a class and call all the python stuff from there.
Andi..
On Jun 29, 2011, at 18:18, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
I'm building a Java wrapper for the Python regex module, and I'd like to
be able to call the module function escape from Java. It takes a
string and
Thank you for the details.
Andi..
On Jun 29, 2011, at 19:37, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Sigh. The setuptools story is getting worse.
I wonder how the
'distribute' project is doing... It's the solution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3258.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.3)
These issues were fixed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057407#comment-13057407
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3258:
-
just to followup, the changes here didn't make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057428#comment-13057428
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3079:
bq. the previous fail is somehow
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a
line-by-line port. It ceases to be Lucene.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
To:
Those are pretty strong words -- I'd really like to know why I
shouldn't trust anything but a line-by-line port. Can you explain a
bit?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Granroth, Neal V.
neal.granr...@thermofisher.com wrote:
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the
As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or not.
But as a contributer, I would prefer a parallel code that makes the life
easier for manual ports of new releases(until this process is automated)
PS: I presume no one thinks of functional or index-level incompatibility.
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Put everything into a class and call all the python stuff from there.
I'd like to make the method on the Java class be static, so I'd like
that method to create an instance and call a protected or
package-private method that is implemented by the Python
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057445#comment-13057445
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3079:
Thanks guys for doing this port so quickly. The
For the sake of continued conversation, Scott could you define what you mean
by line-by-line port vs non-line-by-line port since technically your the
thread starter?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote:
As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is
Am 29.06.2011 18:13, schrieb Andi Vajda:
Sigh. The setuptools story is getting worse. I wonder how the 'distribute'
project is doing... It's the solution I used for the Python 3.1 jcc port I
did last summer. In particular, I wonder if they integrated my patch, for
that issue 43 I filed like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057448#comment-13057448
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3258:
---
I don't think won't fix is the correct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-428.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Please post questions to the mailing list, not in JIRA
How to do that the results are
I think this vote has passed. Let's move to 1.6!
Uwe can you update Jenkins?
Simon
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:30 PM, DM Smith dmsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from old-stick-in-the-mud, whose vote does not count :)
BTW, today Apple released Java 1.5.0_30. So while Oracle has not supplied
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3079:
Attachment: LUCENE-3079.patch
updated patch: all tests pass.
I changed the nocommits to TODO
On Jun 29, 2011, at 22:06, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Put everything into a class and call all the python stuff from there.
I'd like to make the method on the Java class be static, so I'd like
that method to create an instance and call a
On Jun 29, 2011, at 22:17, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Am 29.06.2011 18:13, schrieb Andi Vajda:
Sigh. The setuptools story is getting worse. I wonder how the 'distribute'
project is doing... It's the solution I used for the Python 3.1 jcc port I
did last summer. In particular,
DONE. Now let's update build.xmls!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:37 PM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057468#comment-13057468
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3079:
-
Committed revision 1141246.
I think we should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned SOLR-2625:
-
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
NPE in Term Vector Components
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated SOLR-2625:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2625.patch
phew, this is not the nicest part of the lucene / solr codebase.
When I look at the goals of Lucene.Net I am trying to understand what is
more important to Lucene.Net users, .NET functionality or a line-for-line
port.
.NET and Java are close but not the same. In the past when give the choice
between a better .NET way or stay with the Java implementation the
Hi Scott,
Please avoid crossposting(as I do now). Since when I reply to your eMail, it
goes to one of the lists and thread is splitted into two.
It may be good for announcements but not for discussions.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057483#comment-13057483
]
Mitsu Hadeishi commented on SOLR-2462:
--
We just ran into this bug when we upgraded to
I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on user vs.
contributor. The project needs to also consider those of us who use
Lucene.NET source releases only.
It is much easier to locally patch/fix the source when I can compare it
directly to Lucene core.
- Neal
-Original
It looks like the vote has passed... I'll work on getting these artifacts out.
Thanks everyone for voting.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
+1
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057486#comment-13057486
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2462:
---
bq. We just ran into this bug when we
need to clarify/change DPenum api for hasPayload/getPayload
Key: LUCENE-3259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3259
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
need a test that uses termsenum.seekExact() (which returns true), then calls
next()
---
Key: LUCENE-3260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260
Project:
Others have done a much better , more through job of explaining the issues in
previous discussions. It would be best to re-read those.
One way to understand it, is if Lucene.NET cannot be compared to the reference
source code (Lucene core java Lucene) than it becomes nearly impossible to
I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on user vs.
contributor. The project needs to also consider those of us who use
Lucene.NET source releases only.
It is much easier to locally patch/fix the source when I can compare it
directly to Lucene core.
- Neal
-Original
I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on user vs.
contributor.
I am sorry for this misunderstanding.
What I tried to say with contributor(not committer) was the people that
works on Lucene.Net source code, not the ones who just consume it.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057515#comment-13057515
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3256:
{quote}
I'm not sure if we should change the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057515#comment-13057515
]
Chris Male edited comment on LUCENE-3256 at 6/29/11 10:15 PM:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 29, 2011, at 22:06, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Put everything into a class and call all the python stuff from there.
I'd like to make the method on the Java class be static, so I'd like
that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-3260:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
need a test that uses termsenum.seekExact()
I pretty much agree with Rory.
And as others have said, this issue has been discussed many times. What is
most important about the fact that it has been discussed many times is that
it has not been resolve, even though it has been discussed so many times.
That means that the both the developer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3260:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3260.patch
Patch, w/ new test showing the issue in MTE when you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2454.
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of LUCENE-3171.
Nested Document query support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3171.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.3)
3.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057538#comment-13057538
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2454:
bq. Do you think there any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057565#comment-13057565
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3256:
Command for patch is:
{code}
svn move
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male resolved LUCENE-3256.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Chris Male
Committed revision 1141366.
Consolidate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera reopened LUCENE-3258:
Reopening to change resolution
File leak when IOException occurs during index optimization.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3258.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.3
Already fixed in 3.3
File leak when IOException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057595#comment-13057595
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3259:
-
{quote}
If DPEnum says getPayload() returns
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057596#comment-13057596
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3260:
Patch looks good Mike.
One minor comment,
Faceting module userguide
-
Key: LUCENE-3261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3261
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: modules/facet
Reporter: Shai Erera
Facet benchmarking
--
Key: LUCENE-3262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3262
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: modules/benchmark, modules/facet
Reporter: Shai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057599#comment-13057599
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3079:
I opened LUCENE-3261 and LUCENE-3260 to track
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Sokolov updated LUCENE-2878:
-
Attachment: PosHighlighter.patch
Attaching a patch with a simple highlighter using the
Create Build-A-Module process
-
Key: LUCENE-3263
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3263
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: general/build
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3242:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3242.patch
Patch which converts common-build.xml (lucene's) project name to
crank up faceting module tests
--
Key: LUCENE-3264
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3264
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Test
Components: modules/facet
Reporter: Robert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3264:
Attachment: LUCENE-3264.patch
crank up faceting module tests
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3241:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3241.patch
Patch that deprecates the contents of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13057620#comment-13057620
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3241:
Command for patch:
{code}
svn move
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
