July 2011, Apache Solr™ 3.3 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 3.3.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9216/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.facet.util.TestScoredDocIDsUtils.testWithDeletions
Error Message:
Deleted docs must not appear in the allDocsScoredDocIds set
Stack Trace:
Hi,
I don't understand the whole discussion here, so please compare these two
implementations and tell me which one is faster. Please don't hurt me, if you
don't want to see src.jar code from OpenJDK Java6 - just delete this mail if
you don’t want to (the code here is licensed under GPL):
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9221/
11 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.util.TestFieldCacheSanityChecker.testIndexAndMerge
Error Message:
Forked Java VM exited abnormally. Please note the time in the report does not
reflect the time until the VM exit.
Is fixed now, was a problem during cutover to 3.3 backwards tests.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk...@builds.apache.org]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9222/
11 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.util.TestFieldCacheSanityChecker.testIndexAndMerge
Error Message:
Forked Java VM exited abnormally. Please note the time in the report does not
reflect the time until the VM exit.
use of FST for SynonymsFilterFactory and synonyms.txt
-
Key: SOLR-2628
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2628
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss reassigned SOLR-2628:
-
Assignee: Dawid Weiss
use of FST for SynonymsFilterFactory and synonyms.txt
I don't need information about solr projects.
*
*
**yazhini**
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058241#comment-13058241
]
Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-2628:
---
I've talked about it a little bit with Bernd and
I don't need message from your mail sir.
warning about org.apache.solr.request.SolrQueryResponse is deprecated
-
Key: SOLR-2629
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2629
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058461#comment-13058461
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2623:
-
Hoss, I wish there was a way to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058468#comment-13058468
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2628:
--
Dawid, have a look at LUCENE-3233 --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved SOLR-2628.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of LUCENE-3233
use of FST for SynonymsFilterFactory and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058470#comment-13058470
]
Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-2628:
---
Yep, this is a duplicate. Thanks Mike. Like I said
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058475#comment-13058475
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2628:
--
I think the reduction of RAM should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058476#comment-13058476
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3272:
Big +1! We've needed query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058489#comment-13058489
]
Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-2628:
---
Yes, this may be the case. It'd need to be
I think joining and grouping are two different functions, and we
should keep different modules for them...
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
when looking at just a very quick glance at some of the newer
grouping/join features, I found myself a little
XsltUpdateRequestHandler
Key: SOLR-2630
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: update
Affects Versions: 4.0
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Upayavira updated SOLR-2630:
Attachment: xslt-update-handler.patch
Patch for XsltUpdateRequestHandler, along with a test case for it
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant FC insanity. It does not appear to be an NPE.
That's natural, and not a bug. Grouping always uses per-segment field
cache entries, where faceting sometimes uses top level field caches.
-Yonik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058540#comment-13058540
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2630:
-
XML is binary data, so you should not convert it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058541#comment-13058541
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2630:
-
Also you miss to pass the content type charset
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned SOLR-2630:
---
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
XsltUpdateRequestHandler
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand the whole discussion here, so please compare these two
implementations and tell me which one is faster. Please don't hurt me, if you
don't want to see src.jar code from OpenJDK Java6 - just delete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058548#comment-13058548
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2309:
Great!
This will overlap w/ the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058549#comment-13058549
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2883:
+1, this is great Chris!
I think what would be best is a smallish but feature complete demo,
For the nested stuff I had a reasonable demo on LUCENE-2454 that was based
around resumes - that use case has the one-to-many characteristics that lends
itself to nested e.g. a person has many different qualifications and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058552#comment-13058552
]
Upayavira commented on SOLR-2630:
-
Great! I was sure I'd missed stuff. Happy to improve
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
The join module does currently depend on the grouping module, but for
a silly reason: just for the TopGroups, to represent the returned
hits. We could move TopGroups/GroupDocs into common (thus justifying
its
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/168/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 7442 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2630:
Attachment: xslt-update-handler.patch
Here improved patch. This impl does not internally serialize
@Rory, @All,
The only tickets I currently have for those is LUCENE-419, LUCENE-418
418, I should be able to push into the 2.9.4g branch tonight.419 is a
long term goal and not as important as getting the tests fixed, of have the
tests broken down into what is actually a unit test, functional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2630:
Affects Version/s: 3.3
Fix Version/s: 3.4
Merging to 3.x should be simple, too!
* need to document what the build script does. whut grammerz?
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Michael Herndon
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net wrote:
@Rory, @All,
The only tickets I currently have for those is LUCENE-419, LUCENE-418
418, I should be able to push into the 2.9.4g branch
On 7/1/2011 at 10:02 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
[...] I think we should take our contrib/demo and consolidate 'examples'
across various places into this demo module. The reason is:
* examples typically depend upon 'concrete' stuff, but in general core
stuff should work around
About the encoders package - there are several encoders there besides
VInt, so I wouldn't dispose of it so quickly. That said, I think we
should definitely explore consolidating VInt with the core classes,
and maybe write an encoder which delegate to them.
Or, come up w/ a different approach for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058626#comment-13058626
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2623:
Grr... right, right. ObjectInstance != MBean.
Solr JMX
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved SOLR-2630.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed trunk revision: 1141999
Committed 3.x revision: 1142003
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058679#comment-13058679
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2630:
Hmmm... from a user perspective does it really make sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058681#comment-13058681
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2630:
-
I was thinking about that, it would be easy to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058690#comment-13058690
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2630:
-
On the other hand, this one is similar to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058705#comment-13058705
]
Upayavira commented on SOLR-2630:
-
I considered the same thing, making the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058730#comment-13058730
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-3272:
--
single module != single jar ... correct?
someone
@Michael -
Should that list be in JIRA? It would be easier to manage, I think...
If yes, I'll happily do it.
-r
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Michael Herndon mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
wrote:
* need to document what the build script does. whut grammerz?
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:52
I think whatever makes sense to do.
possibly create one jira for now with a running list that can be modified
and possibly as people pull from that list, cross things off or create a
separate ticket that links back to to the main one.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Rory Plaire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058769#comment-13058769
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3272:
-
single jar, but you can customize: its open
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon updated LUCENENET-400:
--
Due Date: 30/Sep/11 (was: 28/Feb/11)
Evaluate tooling for continuous integration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058781#comment-13058781
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-418:
---
r1132085 under the
PingRequestHandler can infinite loop if called with a qt that points to itsself
---
Key: SOLR-2631
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2631
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058785#comment-13058785
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2631:
-
Edoardo Tosca, who reported the issue, gave the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2631:
Description:
We got a security report to priv...@lucene.apache.org, that Solr can infinite
loop,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2429.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.4
ability to not cache a filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058836#comment-13058836
]
Mitsu Hadeishi commented on SOLR-2462:
--
Oh now you tell us. :) Well, we already built
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058844#comment-13058844
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2399:
-
So, after a few hours
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058848#comment-13058848
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1499:
-
Ahmet- are you still using this?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058865#comment-13058865
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2399:
-
First Feedback from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058879#comment-13058879
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2399:
---
{quote}
Uwe, maybe you could give it a try w/
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1612/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 9445 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
My thinking is just a separate ticket for each one. This makes the work
easier to manage and gives a better sense about how much work is left as
well as makes it easier to prioritize independent issues. We could link all
the sub-issues to a single task / feature / whatever (that is, if JIRA has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058761#comment-13058761
]
Troy Howard commented on LUCENENET-404:
---
Just a quick update. The artist is
@Rory,
Jira in the past had the ability to create sub tasks or convert a current
task to a sub task. I'm guessing that apache's jira should be able to do
that.
@All,
I've add a Paths Class under the Lucene.Net.Tests Util folder (feel free to
rename, refactor as long as the tests still work) to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on LUCENENET-404 started by Troy Howard.
Improve brand logo design
-
Key: LUCENENET-404
URL:
The PyLucene 3.3.0-1 release closely tracking the recent release of Lucene
Java 3.3 is ready.
A release candidate is available from:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
A list of changes in this release can be seen at:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
By the way, you might want to add a paragraph in that section about
adding the [-framework, Python] flags for building JCC on OS X. I
tripped over that again.
If you send a paragraph to this effect, I'll integrate it into the docs.
Here's a patch:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
That being said, if you send in javadoc patches, I agree, the results
should be published like they are on the lucene/java site (under
resources) and I can take care of that.
Here's a patch (against the JCC branch_3x):
--- java/org/apache/jcc/PythonVM.java
68 matches
Mail list logo
