ParametricRangeQueryNodeProcessor support for time zones
Key: LUCENE-3352
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3352
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
ParametricRangeQueryNodeProcessor uses incorrect logic at the lower bound
-
Key: LUCENE-3353
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3353
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073447#comment-13073447
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2337:
-
Yes the trunk and branch3x do
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-trunk/1586/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload
Error Message:
Number of registered MBeans is not the same as info registry size expected:51
but was:46
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073462#comment-13073462
]
Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1879:
-
The user mentioned above in comment was me, I guess.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073474#comment-13073474
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3353:
---
This seems to be related to LUCENE-1768
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073475#comment-13073475
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2979:
---
There was an issue opened today:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3353:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: This seems to be related to LUCENE-1768 and LUCENE-2979, as we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073475#comment-13073475
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2979 at 8/1/11 9:40 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073476#comment-13073476
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3352:
---
This seems to be related to LUCENE-1768
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen closed SOLR-2337.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Solr needs hits= added to the log when using grouping
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen closed SOLR-1682.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Implement CollapseComponent
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073515#comment-13073515
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2686:
--
+1, though really this should be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073518#comment-13073518
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3354:
---
+1. If DocTermOrds is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073522#comment-13073522
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3354:
---
What are thoughts on using DocValues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073527#comment-13073527
]
Jay R. Jaeger commented on SOLR-2676:
-
Wow. That was fast. Thanks.
Add a
OK I found the problem: 3.x can't handle the U+ character (we
replace it on indexing), while trunk can. So I think we just have to
fix randomFixedByteLengthUnicodeString to never use that char. I'll
commit...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:33 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073530#comment-13073530
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3354:
-
+1, die insanity, die.
Extend FieldCache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073533#comment-13073533
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3354:
+1 to moving FC to atomic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073532#comment-13073532
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3354:
---
bq. What are thoughts on
Hi,
i need to order by function like:
sort=sum(field1,field2,field3)+desc
but solr gives me this error:
Missing sort order.
why is this possible? i read that is possible to order by function, from
version 1.3
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Sort_By_Function)
i use version 1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073535#comment-13073535
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3348:
Thanks Simon; I'll make both of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073536#comment-13073536
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3354:
--
bq. (icluding the broken Solr parts still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073538#comment-13073538
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3354:
---
bq. If that ability is removed from
Dear Lucene.NET Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 August 2011, 10 am Pacific. The
report
for
Sort by function is not available in 1.4. It's in 3.1.
On Aug 1, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Gastone Penzo wrote:
Hi,
i need to order by function like:
sort=sum(field1,field2,field3)+desc
but solr gives me this error:
Missing sort order.
why is this possible? i read that is possible to order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073556#comment-13073556
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3348:
-
bq. Unfortunately there is still at
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Cannot create directory:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/checkout/solr/example/multicore/core1/data/index
at
org.apache.lucene.store.SimpleFSLock.obtain(SimpleFSLockFactory.java:121)
at
Hi Lukasz,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, ?ukasz Jancewicz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 17:09, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
For example, is there a piece of gentyref code that I could 'borrow' (with
attribution of course) and include that in the JCC sources to fix this
particular problem ?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073588#comment-13073588
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3348:
Here's what I run with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3030:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3030.patch
Checkpointing my current state here -- the big change
I agree, these events do feel coincidental.
Not sure what constitutes the example test framework, but I did move the
ExternalPaths utility class into the solr test-framework, because it's used
from both the Solr core tests and the Solrj tests, which don't depend (anymore)
on the Solr core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073611#comment-13073611
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-1223:
bq. I'd rather see a new filterQuery type like ofq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2684.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed revision 1152885.
CHANGES.txt attrib added to
On trunk currently, it looks like the following data directories
(outside of /build) are used by the tests:
./core/src/test-files/solr/data
./example/multicore/core0/data
./example/multicore/core1/data
Not sure if this was the case in the past or not... I'll verify.
-Yonik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nikola Tankovic updated LUCENE-2308:
Attachment: LUCENE-2308-19.patch
Removed old oal.Document, except in documentation. Tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani resolved LUCENE-3338.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Adriano Crestani (was: Uwe Schindler)
Flexible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073663#comment-13073663
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-3343:
--
The code for 4.0 was just committed
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On trunk currently, it looks like the following data directories
(outside of /build) are used by the tests:
./core/src/test-files/solr/data
./example/multicore/core0/data
./example/multicore/core1/data
Not sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073678#comment-13073678
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3348:
-
mike I can not reproduce this
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9924/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 12464 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073800#comment-13073800
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3030:
I created a branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3348:
---
Attachment: fail.txt.bz2
Full output from a failure.
IndexWriter applies wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073804#comment-13073804
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3348:
OK I attached output of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073828#comment-13073828
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-3354:
--
bq. This would also remove the insanity issues.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Phillipe Ramalho updated LUCENE-2979:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2979_phillipe_ramalho_4_trunk.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13075974#comment-13075974
]
Phillipe Ramalho commented on LUCENE-2979:
--
Hi Uwe,
Is there anything to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13075978#comment-13075978
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2308:
Patch looks good Nikola; I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13075980#comment-13075980
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2565:
This issue says committed in the comments,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13075993#comment-13075993
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2565:
---
Yeah, sorry - it's open as a reminder for me to make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13076033#comment-13076033
]
Nikola Tankovic commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
Yes, exactly! That is my next step,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9930/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MergeIndexesEmbeddedTest.testMergeIndexesByCoreName
Error Message:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
Incorrect behaviour of MultiFieldQueryNodeProcessor when default operator is
'AND'
--
Key: LUCENE-3355
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3355
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13076053#comment-13076053
]
Shay Banon commented on LUCENE-3335:
@Uwe I actually forgot about this, and did not
I don't think there's any harm in putting StyleCop in the project at this
stage, but of course, no harm not putting it in either. It would be handy
for people who already have VS2008/2010, as we could keep Lucene with the
same style format across the project as a whole.
IMO, I think the Naming,
55 matches
Mail list logo
