[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male resolved LUCENE-4079.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
Thanks Ludovic!
The hunspell filter
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/313/
--
[...truncated 13637 lines...]
[junit4] 2 17804 T2830 oasc.RequestHandlers.initHandlersFromConfig
created spellCheckCompRH1:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285435#comment-13285435
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-3477:
---
I just tested this doesn't apply to Solr 4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285460#comment-13285460
]
ludovic Boutros commented on LUCENE-4079:
-
Thanks Chris for taking this patch in
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/314/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285518#comment-13285518
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-4069:
--
Thanks for the comment, Rob.
While the
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2707/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.util.packed.TestPackedInts.testIntOverflow
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285538#comment-13285538
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-4083:
---
Hmm, right ... something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285546#comment-13285546
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4083:
-
Andrzej can you include the full stack trace?
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/181/
--
[...truncated 11425 lines...]
[junit4]
[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchemaTest
[junit4] Completed in 0.82s, 3 tests
[junit4]
[junit4]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285599#comment-13285599
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-4083:
---
Yes, it happened during testing,
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/319/
--
[...truncated 1255 lines...]
[junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermsEnum2
[junit4] Completed in 0.23s, 4 tests
[junit4]
[junit4] Suite:
why are we backporting new features to a bugfix branch?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:07 AM, chr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: chrism
Date: Wed May 30 05:07:31 2012
New Revision: 1344101
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1344101view=rev
Log:
LUCENE-4079: Added support for aliaising (AF
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/182/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
I would argue it is a bug fix, it fixes the handling of a certain kind of
dictionary.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
why are we backporting new features to a bugfix branch?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:07 AM, chr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: chrism
With that in mind, I shouldnt put it under New features.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Chris Male gento...@gmail.com wrote:
I would argue it is a bug fix, it fixes the handling of a certain kind of
dictionary.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
why
i didnt even look at the issue at all, i just noticed it has New
Features in changes.txt
I think this is confusing: can we fix CHANGES if its really a bugfix
to be under Bugfixes?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Chris Male gento...@gmail.com wrote:
With that in mind, I shouldnt put it under
Yup, done.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
i didnt even look at the issue at all, i just noticed it has New
Features in changes.txt
I think this is confusing: can we fix CHANGES if its really a bugfix
to be under Bugfixes?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:10
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285654#comment-13285654
]
Christoph Kaser commented on LUCENE-4082:
-
Thank you, works perfectly!
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/320/
--
[...truncated 13237 lines...]
[junit4] 2 46564 T2761 C172 REQ [collection1] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={wt=javabinq=*:*version=2} hits=497 status=0 QTime=0
Hi!
I would like to contribute a more granular NRT implementation as to
soft-commit (enabled with the realtime tag). This does not close the
SolrIndexSearcher instances but keeps passing the NRT reader as a
parameter to the searcher maintaining the searcher paradigm of being
lean and
Nagendra,
Simply open a JIRA issue and attach a patch. Lucene/Solr development
largely centers around JIRA issues via the comments.
Ideally you should provide tests as part of your patch; it certainly won't
be committed if sufficient tests are never furnished. If your NRT
implementation really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285695#comment-13285695
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3178:
I had missed this last update during the crazy
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/504/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex.testLuceneConstantVersion
Error Message:
Invalid version: 4.0-SNAPSHOT
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Invalid version: 4.0-SNAPSHOT
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285702#comment-13285702
]
Christoph Kaser commented on LUCENE-4077:
-
Hi Mike,
shouldn't TopGroups.maxScore
On May 23, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
Agree with Grant that we need a better, more structured documentation set,
per version.
But let's first do what Ryan suggests - switch to Confluence - put all
converted MoinMoin pages in a separate legacy section of the Wiki.
Then in phase
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/321/changes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285706#comment-13285706
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-4069:
--
Aaaargh. Unless I've missed something, I
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4864
On May 19, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
A *long* time ago we discussed converting to confluence to replace the
forest site. The key issue was that only commiters could have access
if we want to include the generated PDF in the
I figured this would happen. I saw quite a few places that are 4.0.0
in the maven files, but it wasnt obvious to me which one was the one i
should change.
I think this is because maven internally has 4.0.0 as the version of
some files.
Does anyone know? I think we should add an xml comment above
David:
There is no commit with this approach, hence no closing of the
SolrIndexSearcher object. Regarding the cache invalidation, there are
some thoughts on selective dynamic update nothing has been implemented
yet. The desired cache is disabled for now depending on the search
needs.
I just committed a fix: it was a version property in build.xml
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:48 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #504: POMs out of sync
I figured this would
Maven uses major.minor.bugfix format for versioning. I don't think it
can be changed.
Dawid
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I figured this would happen. I saw quite a few places that are 4.0.0
in the maven files, but it wasnt obvious to me which one was the
Thanks... I missed that one!
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
I just committed a fix: it was a version property in build.xml
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:48 AM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285726#comment-13285726
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4069:
-
I'm not sure this is true: e.g. if your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285746#comment-13285746
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4069:
When I run all tests with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285744#comment-13285744
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-4069:
--
This fails if you add docs with title and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285745#comment-13285745
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4069:
-
As far as your problem with parameters, this
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4090:
---
Summary: PerFieldPostingsFormat cannot use name as suffix
Key: LUCENE-4090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4090
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
On 30/05/2012 17:09, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
I'm not sure this is true: e.g. if your postings format requires parameters to
decode the segment, then this enforces that it records said parameters,
e.g. Pulsing records these parameters.
Codec parameters are at index-time, at read-time its your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285757#comment-13285757
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4069:
-
Mark: I opened LUCENE-4090.. I broke it, so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-462.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Itamar Syn-Hershko
Resolved with the new module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-462.
-
Spatial Search skipping records with small radius e.g. 1 mile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-489.
---
Resolution: Fixed
New spatial module
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-489.
-
New spatial module
--
Key: LUCENENET-489
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Andrzej Bialecki a...@getopt.org wrote:
On 30/05/2012 17:09, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
I'm not sure this is true: e.g. if your postings format requires
parameters to decode the segment, then this enforces that it records said
parameters,
e.g. Pulsing records
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285765#comment-13285765
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-4069:
--
bq. its just an issue with
Prescott Nasser created LUCENENET-492:
-
Summary: Investigate Improvements to Sharpen for 4.0 conversion
Key: LUCENENET-492
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-492
Project:
AFAICT, there is no clear documentation of the maximum number of documents that
can be stored in a Lucene or Solr Index (single core/shard). It appears to be
2^31 since a Lucene document number and the value returned from IW.maxDoc is a
Java “int”. Lucene users have that “hint” to guide them,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285768#comment-13285768
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4069:
-
Right, its not bad. Separately I'm not happy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285773#comment-13285773
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-4069:
--
bq. When I run all tests with the bloom 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer resolved LUCENE-3523.
Resolution: Fixed
committed:
Trunk, r1344320
Branch_4x: r1344329
I do not seem to have the
sebastian L. created LUCENE-4091:
Summary: FastVectorHighlighter: Getter for
FieldFragList.WeightedFragInfo and FieldPhraseList.WeightedPhraseInfo
Key: LUCENE-4091
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastian L. updated LUCENE-4091:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-4091.patch
FastVectorHighlighter: Getter for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285786#comment-13285786
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3523:
-
bq. I do not seem to have the ability to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285787#comment-13285787
]
sebastian L. commented on LUCENE-3440:
--
Hi Koji,
bq. This is a great idea and it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer reassigned LUCENE-3523:
--
Assignee: James Dyer
It works. Thanks, Steven!
WordBreakSpellChecker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285797#comment-13285797
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4077:
bq. Otherwise,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285799#comment-13285799
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4083:
bq. Still, I think this
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/14451/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 19647 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4077:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4077.patch
New patch, using the collector's maxScore in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4090:
Attachment: LUCENE-4090.patch
attached is a patch for trunk.
tests pass (obviously
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285832#comment-13285832
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4090:
Patch looks good! Nice having
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2711/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 20613 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
If you look at MSDN, the new WinRT (Windows Runtime) is designated Metro
style apps.
There are indeed significant changes. Most of it relates to the asynchronous
nature of the runtime and the sandboxed IO libraries. I understand that a
wrapper has been written for SQLite, so it's possible. I
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/14452/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 24335 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/14453/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 24329 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285913#comment-13285913
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4090:
-
Patch is still buggy, new one coming. My test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4090:
Attachment: LUCENE-4090.patch
updated patch. I beefed up randomcodec to add Memory(false) and
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/14454/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler
Error Message:
ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher opens=74 closes=73
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285930#comment-13285930
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4083:
-
bq. I agree: I think in general whoever does
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/325/changes
Changes:
[jdyer] LUCENE-3523: Javadoc fix
[rmuir] fix lucenetestcase to report the actual codec used instead of always
lucene40 when a test fails
--
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-4092:
---
Summary: Check what's Jenkins pattern for e-mailing log fragments
(so that it includes failures).
Key: LUCENE-4092
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/14455/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 24335 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285981#comment-13285981
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
*Editable Email Notification*/*Default
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/326/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285991#comment-13285991
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
Yeah, but what is ${FAILED_TESTS}? I mean --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-4090.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.0
Thanks for bringing this up
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4093:
---
Summary: Implement better equals() on PostingsFormats where
possible
Key: LUCENE-4093
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4093
Project: Lucene - Java
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-4094:
---
Summary: Randomize file.encoding
Key: LUCENE-4094
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4094
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Sub-task
That commit was for the 4x branch as well as trunk, right?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 4:32 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: reindex trunk indexes
I just committed LUCENE-4090, you should reindex any trunk indexes.
--
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/14456/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 24327 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286026#comment-13286026
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
bq. Yeah, but what is $\{FAILED_TESTS}? I mean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286028#comment-13286028
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4094:
-
This would be really nice. The limitation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286036#comment-13286036
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4094:
-
junit4 is already default encoding independent
yes
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
That commit was for the 4x branch as well as trunk, right?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Robert Muir Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012
4:32 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: reindex trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286042#comment-13286042
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
Ok, so BUILD_LOG_REGEX should do! I don't know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286064#comment-13286064
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
I'll switch it to the following - hopefully it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286075#comment-13286075
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
bq.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286078#comment-13286078
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
This will be a killer regexp, I can feel it ;)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286086#comment-13286086
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
Is there also a way we could improve the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286088#comment-13286088
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
By the way: I'm not suggesting to make the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-2993:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2993.patch
New patch. Clean things up, fix bugs, etc. This is getting close...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286106#comment-13286106
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
This one seems to work (from Perl against a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13286116#comment-13286116
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-4092:
-
{quote}
Is there also a way we could improve
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4095:
---
Summary: remove deprecations from trunk
Key: LUCENE-4095
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4095
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4095:
Attachment: LUCENE-4095.patch
Patch taking care of the majority (but not all!) of the
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/328/changes
Changes:
[dweiss] Minor cleanups of LuceneTestCase and reproduce string builder.
--
[...truncated 13642 lines...]
[junit4] 2 41023 T2892 oasc.SolrCore.close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-3473:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3473.patch
Updated patch to include my (meager) attempt at fixing the problem by making
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/329/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
