RE: Query - SOLR 1.0

Hi David, Thank you very much for your revert. Just one query SOLR embedded zookeeper will require JAVA server VM or Java Client VM? Thanks, Shilvi From: David Smiley Sent: 26 February 2020 23:07 To: Solr/Lucene Dev Subject: Re: Query - SOLR 1.0 This message originated from outside our

adding expressible plugins via API

Hello! I've wanted to create a JIRA Ticket, but the interface asked me to discuss this here, which seems fine as well. Assumptions (which might as well false): The package management/plugin infrastructure allows me to add plugin jars via several options. Since expressibles only work in

Re: Query - SOLR 1.0

We will not answer user questions on the development list. Please respect David’s request to move your questions to solr-u...@lucene.apache.org mailing list. Jan > 27. feb. 2020 kl. 10:20 skrev shilvi.par...@barclays.com.invalid > : > > Hi David, > > Thank you very much for your revert.

Re: Streaming Tagger

Hello again! On 25.02.20 22:39, David Smiley wrote: I haven't worked on streaming expressions yet but I did a little bit of digging around.  I think the ClassifyStream might be somewhat similar to learn from.  It takes a stream of docs, not unlike what you want.  And crucially it implements

Re: Lucene62Codec Overwrites Payloads Across the Documents

I tested these versions and I can reproduce for each one:  v6.3.0  v7.7.2  v8.3.1 org.apache.lucene lucene-test-framework 8.3.1     For 8.3.1, you will need to change MultiFields.getTermPositionsEnum(...) to  MultiTerms.getTermPostingsEnum(...). On Thursday,

Lucene62Codec Overwrites Payloads Across the Documents

I noticed a weird payload behavior with Solr 6.3.0.  After writing the Lucene62Codec specific unit test (attached) I think there could be a bug which allows for the same term payloads to be written into another document's same term payload (or the second payload for the second document being

Re: Typo in the documentation of Spell Check

Thanks for reporting bugs. I checked the Reference Guide and the documentation seems correct: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/spell-checking.html#spell-check-parameters In fact that parameter was only added to the documentation from version 7.3. Please specify exactly which

Re: Streaming Tagger

Eric, On 27.02.20 14:40, Eric Pugh wrote: David,   I know I’d love to see the code! Here you go. Not pretty, but it works. https://github.com/einsweniger/SolrStreamTagger/ This is not how I plan to do this upstream, just if somebody looks at it. regards, David

Typo in the documentation of Spell Check

Hello, I'd like sharing an error in the documentation of Solr related to SpellCheck. I was investigating why the parameter spellcheck.queryAnalyzerFieldtype wasn't working and I saw that type was lowercase in the documentation. The correct should be spellcheck.queryAnalyzerFieldType Hope to be

Re: Streaming Tagger

David, I know I’d love to see the code! I’ve been working on streaming expression called “bump” that triggers a atomic update reindex process on a document. I’m using it as part of a relevancy experimentation workflow where I add a new copyField or change my schema analyzers, and then I

Re: adding expressible plugins via API

David, I think our efforts are running in parallel, as yesterday I did the exact same thing as you!!! The good news is that if you are on unreleased 8.5, the add-expressible works!!! I spent some time tearing my hair out working with Master, and then 8.4.1, and then finally moved over to

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-master - Build # 4353 - Still Failing

Hey, Whatsup? On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:35 PM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-master/4353/ > > All tests passed > > Build Log: > [...truncated 68080 lines...] > BUILD FAILED >

Re: adding expressible plugins via API

Also, Noble and I have been working on trying to get expressibles to work with the new package manager. Will put some samples together soon. On Thu, 27 Feb, 2020, 7:20 pm Eric Pugh, wrote: > David, I think our efforts are running in parallel, as yesterday I did the > exact same thing as you!!!

Re: Streaming Tagger

I'm glad you got it working! It's sad you felt the need to copy-paste the tagger; perhaps you can recommend changes to make it more extensible so that you or others needn't fork it. I'm not sure if something like this should be contributed back to Solr itself. I don't even know the bigger

How to correctly get the value given a DocId

Hi guys! I am a newbie and I am trying to upgrade from Lucene 6.2.1 to 8.4.1 The previous code was leveraging this https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/releases/lucene-solr/6.2.1/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/NumericDocValues.java#L34 now

Re: How to correctly get the value given a DocId

I changed the code to return a default value instead of an exception. In case the doc will not be found. I would like really to understand better why we have such comment in that iterator * Returns the numeric value for the current document ID. * It is illegal > to call this method after