[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3135) backport suggest module to branch 3.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13038418#comment-13038418 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-3135: - if we can backport the FST-based functionality +1

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3289) FST should allow controlling how hard builder tries to share suffixes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061804#comment-13061804 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-3289: - bq. The strings are extremely long (more like short

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-1879) Parallel incremental indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13073462#comment-13073462 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1879: - The user mentioned above in comment was me, I guess.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2701) Expose IndexWriter.commit(MapString,String commitUserData) to solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080474#comment-13080474 ] Eks Dev commented on SOLR-2701: --- one hook for users to update content of this map would be to

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2701) Expose IndexWriter.commit(MapString,String commitUserData) to solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated SOLR-2701: -- Attachment: SOLR-2701.patch rather simplistic approach, adding userCommitData to CommitUpdateCommand. So we at

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3312) Break out StorableField from IndexableField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13287213#comment-13287213 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-3312: - bq. My assumption is that StoredField-s will never be

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2482) Index sorter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12872386#action_12872386 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-2482: - Re: I'm not sure if I follow your use case though

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2557) FuzzyQuery - fuzzy terms and misspellings are ranked higher than exact matches

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892341#action_12892341 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-2557: - It looks like we have one invariant: IDF(QueryTerm) =

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4548) BooleanFilter should optionally pass down further restricted acceptDocs in the MUST case (and acceptDocs in general)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13494858#comment-13494858 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-4548: - ...would be to nuke Filters completely from Lucene ...

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4032) Unable to replicate between nodes ( read past EOF)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13504859#comment-13504859 ] Eks Dev commented on SOLR-4032: --- We see it as well, it looks like it only happens with

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4117) IO error while trying to get the size of the Directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13505530#comment-13505530 ] Eks Dev commented on SOLR-4117: --- fwiw, we *think* we observed the following problem in simple

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-4117) IO error while trying to get the size of the Directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13505530#comment-13505530 ] Eks Dev edited comment on SOLR-4117 at 11/28/12 3:27 PM: - fwiw, we

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4117) IO error while trying to get the size of the Directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1350#comment-1350 ] Eks Dev commented on SOLR-4117: --- fsync of course, fsck was intended for my terminal window :)

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4226) Efficient compression of small to medium stored fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13443897#comment-13443897 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-4226: - bq. but I removed the ability to select the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3684) Frequently full gc while do pressure index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13429985#comment-13429985 ] Eks Dev commented on SOLR-3684: --- We did it a long time ago on tomcat, as we use particularly

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5069) MapReduce for SolrCloud

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13718785#comment-13718785 ] Eks Dev commented on SOLR-5069: --- wow, this is getting pretty close to collection clustering

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3918) Port index sorter to trunk APIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13570663#comment-13570663 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-3918: - this is the right way to give some really good meaning

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4872) BooleanWeight should decide how to execute minNrShouldMatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13615006#comment-13615006 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-4872: - the same pattern like Simon here, just having these

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5914) More options for stored fields compression

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14117986#comment-14117986 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-5914: - bq. Do you have pointers to emails/irc logs describing

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5914) More options for stored fields compression

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14119977#comment-14119977 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-5914: - lovely, thanks for explaining, I expected something

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5938) New DocIdSet implementation with random write access

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14129950#comment-14129950 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-5938: - Just a crazy idea. Do you need to store words with

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-328) Some utilities for a compact sparse filter

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-328?page=comments#action_12361375 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-328: I've been looking at this code and found some minor enhancements that could be done: 1. Any particular reason for SortedVIntList not to

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=comments#action_12414046 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: Peter, there is some advanced things you are probably interested in. see: some utilities for a compact sparse filter LUCENE-328 Also

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=comments#action_12418177 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: Any toughts on adding OpenBitSet from solr here? Decouple Filter from BitSet --- Key: LUCENE-584

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=comments#action_12431702 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: using the latest Matcher20060830.patch ant said BUILD SUCCESSFUL ;) I will see how it works on some real life cases using our

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=comments#action_12432378 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: Hi Paul, for me, this patch did not cause any incompatibility issues. All our tests passed without noticing any difference to the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=comments#action_12432497 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: Paul, What is exact semantics of skipTo(int) in Matcher? - is it OK to skip back and forth before I reach end? e.g.: skipTo(0);

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=comments#action_12434637 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: Paul, What is next now, we did on our app enough experiments and are now sure that this patch causes no incompatibilities. We

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499224 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-888: we did some time ago a few tests and simply concluded, it boils down to what Doug

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-893) Increase buffer sizes used during searching

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499298 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-893: Michael, how many documents were in index? I assume in case where posting are

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1035) Optional Buffer Pool to Improve Search Performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538065 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1035: - did you compare it against MMAP? I Optional Buffer Pool to Improve Search

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557999#action_12557999 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: it looks like ChainedFilter could become obsolete if

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12558115#action_12558115 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: hmm, in order to have fast and/or operations we need to

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12558997#action_12558997 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584: Michal, would this work? 1. providing default

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1145) DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1145: Attachment: TestScorerPerformance.java DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1145) DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1145: Attachment: DisjunctionSumScorerOptimization.patch DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1145) DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak Key: LUCENE-1145 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Search Environment: all

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1146) ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%) optimization

ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%) optimization --- Key: LUCENE-1146 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1146 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components:

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1146) ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%) optimization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1146: Attachment: ConjuctionScorerInitialization.patch ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%) optimization

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1146) ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%) optimization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561375#action_12561375 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1146: - argh.. these were not core tests, all CoreTests pass

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1146) ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%) optimization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561370#action_12561370 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1146: - Whoops, some tests fail! ConjunctionScorer small

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1146) ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%) optimization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1146: Attachment: (was: ConjuctionScorerInitialization.patch) ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%)

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-1146) ConjunctionScorer small (ca. 3.5%) optimization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev closed LUCENE-1146. --- Resolution: Incomplete Lucene Fields: [New] (was: [Patch Available, New]) not ready, patch too bugy

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1145) DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1145: Attachment: DSSQueueSizeOptimization.patch Simplification of the DisjunctionSumScorer. - removed cached

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1145) DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561836#action_12561836 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1145: - Well, I do not know how it behaves on earlier jvm-s and

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1169) Search with Filter does not work!

Search with Filter does not work! - Key: LUCENE-1169 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1169 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: Search Reporter: Eks Dev

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1169) Search with Filter does not work!

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12566971#action_12566971 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1169: - Thank you for fixing it in no time :) But... I am

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1187) Things to be done now that Filter is independent from BitSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12571939#action_12571939 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1187: - Paul, I think there is one CHEKME in

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1035) Optional Buffer Pool to Improve Search Performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12574759#action_12574759 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1035: - Robert, you said: We actually have a multiplexing

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1217) use isBinary cached variable instead of instanceof in Filed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1217: Attachment: LUCENE-1217.patch use isBinary cached variable instead of instanceof in Filed

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1217) use isBinary cached variable instead of instanceof in Filed

use isBinary cached variable instead of instanceof in Filed --- Key: LUCENE-1217 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1217 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data --- Key: LUCENE-1219 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type:

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219: Attachment: LUCENE-1219.patch all tests pass with this patch. some polish needed and probably more

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219: Attachment: LUCENE-1219.patch support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219: Attachment: LUCENE-1219.patch Michael McCandless had some nice ideas on how to make getValue() change

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1217) use isBinary cached variable instead of instanceof in Filed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577591#action_12577591 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1217: - thanks fof looking into it! Subclassing now with

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577597#action_12577597 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1219: - I do not know for sure if this is something we could

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1217) use isBinary cached variable instead of instanceof in Filed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577601#action_12577601 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1217: - hah, this bug just justified this patch :) sorry, I

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1217) use isBinary cached variable instead of instanceof in Filed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1217: Attachment: Lucene-1217-take1.patch new patch, fixes isBinary status in LazyField use isBinary cached

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219: Attachment: LUCENE-1219.patch this one keeps addition of new methods localized to AbstractField, does not

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219: Attachment: LUCENE-1219.patch latest patch updated to the trunk (Lucene-1217 is there. Michael you did

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1187) Things to be done now that Filter is independent from BitSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12578656#action_12578656 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1187: - Michael, I do not think we need to add Factory (for

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

Make it posible not to include TF information in index -- Key: LUCENE-1340 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1340: Attachment: LUCENE-1340.patch first cut Make it posible not to include TF information in index

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1340: Attachment: LUCENE-1340.patch Thanks Mike, with just a little bit more hand-holding we are going to be

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1278) Add optional storing of document numbers in term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615077#action_12615077 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1278: - in light of Mike's comments hier (Michael McCandless -

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1340: Attachment: LUCENE-1340.patch - fixed stupid bug in SegmentTermDocs (was doc = docCode; instead of doc +=

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615357#action_12615357 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1340: - Great, it is already more than I expected, even

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617140#action_12617140 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1340: - we finished our tests Index without omitTf() : -

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1345: Attachment: DisjunctionDISI.patch bq. Would anyone have a DisjunctionDISI (Disjunction over

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1345: Attachment: DisjunctionDISI.patch I just realised TestDisjunctionDISI had a bug (iterators have to be

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1345: Attachment: TestIteratorPerf.java Hi Paul, I gave it a try on micro benchmarking, and it looks like we

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617603#action_12617603 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1345: - great! Will look into at at the weekend in more

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617726#action_12617726 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1345: - Yonik, this would probably work fine for int values (on

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617836#action_12617836 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1345: - bq. comparison with -1 is being optimized away entirely

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1345: Attachment: OpenBitSetIteratorExperiment.java TestIteratorPerf.java I just enhanced

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12617978#action_12617978 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1340: - ouch! it is kind of getting personal between me and

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12618069#action_12618069 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1340: - that sound like consensus :) Great! in that case

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12620019#action_12620019 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1219: - Great Mike, it gets better and better, i saw

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219: Attachment: LUCENE-1219.extended.patch Mike, This new patch includes take3 and adds the following:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621036#action_12621036 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1219: - bq. could we instead add this to Field: byte[]

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219: Attachment: LUCENE-1219.extended.patch bq. couldn't you just call document.getFieldable(name), and then

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623332#action_12623332 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1219: - how was it: repetitio est mater studiorum ;) thanks

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623593#action_12623593 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1219: - bq. did you ever measure the before/after performance

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1329) Remove synchronization in SegmentReader.isDeleted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624634#action_12624634 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1329: - Mike, did someone measure what this brings? This

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1329) Remove synchronization in SegmentReader.isDeleted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624657#action_12624657 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1329: - ok, I see, thanks. At least, It resolves an issue

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1426) Next steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12641128#action_12641128 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1426: - Just a few random thoughts on this topic - I am sure I

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1518) Merge Query and Filter classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12663120#action_12663120 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1518: - nice, you did it top down (api), Paul takes it bottom

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1532) File based spellcheck with doc frequencies supplied

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12669018#action_12669018 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1532: - bq. so it can suggest a very obscure word rather than a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1532) File based spellcheck with doc frequencies supplied

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12669595#action_12669595 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1532: - .bq but I'm not sure the exact frequency number at just

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12688284#action_12688284 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1410: - It looks like Google went there as well (Block

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1561) Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and strengthen the javadocs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12688429#action_12688429 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1561: - maybe something along the lines:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1606) Automaton Query/Filter (scalable regex)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12701279#action_12701279 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1606: - Robert, in order for Lev. Automata to work, you need

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1606) Automaton Query/Filter (scalable regex)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12701298#action_12701298 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1606: - hmmm, sounds like good idea, but I am still not

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1615) deprecated method used in fieldsReader / setOmitTf()

deprecated method used in fieldsReader / setOmitTf() Key: LUCENE-1615 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1615 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1615) deprecated method used in fieldsReader / setOmitTf()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1615: Attachment: LUCENE-1615.patch deprecated method used in fieldsReader / setOmitTf()

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1615) deprecated method used in fieldsReader / setOmitTf()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702901#action_12702901 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1615: - sure, replacing Fieldable is good, just noticed quick

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1616) add one setter for start and end offset to OffsetAttribute

add one setter for start and end offset to OffsetAttribute -- Key: LUCENE-1616 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1616 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1616) add one setter for start and end offset to OffsetAttribute

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1616: Attachment: LUCENE-1616.patch add one setter for start and end offset to OffsetAttribute

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1616) add one setter for start and end offset to OffsetAttribute

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12703085#action_12703085 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1616: - I am ok with both options, removing separate looks a

  1   2   >