Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida as Lucene/Solr committer

2019-04-08 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome! Karl On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:28 PM Christian Moen wrote: > Congratulations, Tomoko-san! > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:20 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Tomoko Uchida as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer! >> >> She has been working on https://i

Re: [lucene] branch main updated: Prevent NPEs while still handling the polar case for horizontal planes right off the pole

2022-11-17 Thread Karl Wright
Thank you for the comment. It took me several days just to get things set up so I was able to commit again, and I did this through command-line not github. The full gradlew script takes over 2 hours to run now so if there's a faster target I can use to determine these things in advance I'd love t

Re: [lucene] branch main updated: Prevent NPEs while still handling the polar case for horizontal planes right off the pole

2022-11-17 Thread Karl Wright
Thanks - the target I was using was the complete "build" target on the whole project. This will be a valuable improvement. ;-) I have slow network here so it is possible that the entire build was slow for that reason. The machine is a new Dell laptop, 12 cores, 64GB memory, but I am running unde

Re: [lucene] 02/03: Fix longstanding bug in path bounds calculation, and hook up efficient isWithin() and distance logic

2022-11-19 Thread Karl Wright
I'm looking at it. Karl On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:41 PM Robert Muir wrote: > Multiple spatial tests are failing in jenkins... bisected them to this > commit. > > Can you please look into it? https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11956 > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 8:22 PM wrote: > > > > This

Re: [lucene] 02/03: Fix longstanding bug in path bounds calculation, and hook up efficient isWithin() and distance logic

2022-11-19 Thread Karl Wright
v 20, 2022 at 1:49 AM Karl Wright wrote: > I'm looking at it. > Karl > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:41 PM Robert Muir wrote: > >> Multiple spatial tests are failing in jenkins... bisected them to this >> commit. >> >> Can you please look into it?

Re: [lucene] branch main updated: Prevent NPEs while still handling the polar case for horizontal planes right off the pole

2022-11-24 Thread Karl Wright
work on the project." > > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/compare-versions > > Dawid > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:11 PM Robert Muir wrote: > > > if your machine is really 12 cores and 64GB ram but is that slow, then > > uninstall that windows

Re: [lucene] branch main updated: More refactoring work, and fix a distance calculation.

2022-11-24 Thread Karl Wright
Thanks, I was unable to get to this until this morning. The code was dead because the corresponding call hadn't been included. Fixed now. Karl On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:50 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Karl, this commit has been failing precommit because it introduced > dead code. I just pushed a

Re: Lucene 9.5.0 release

2023-01-17 Thread Karl Wright
+1 from me. On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:32 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > +1 > > Am 13.01.2023 um 10:54 schrieb Luca Cavanna: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose that we release Lucene 9.5.0. There is a decent > > amount of changes that would go into it looking at the github > > milestone: https://git

Re: Welcome Atri Sharma as Lucene/Solr committer

2019-09-18 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome! Karl On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:38 AM Namgyu Kim wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Atri! XD > > 2019년 9월 19일 (목) 오전 12:24, Gus Heck 님이 작성: > >> Welcome :) >> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:21 AM Kevin Risden wrote: >> >>> Congrats and welcome Atri! >>> >>> Kevin Risden >>> >>> >>> O

Re: Welcome Houston Putman as Lucene/Solr committer

2019-11-14 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome! Karl On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:17 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > Hi Houston, welcome! > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:23 AM Erick Erickson > wrote: > > > > Welcome! > > > > > On Nov 14, 2019, at 5:19 AM, Jan Høydahl > wrote: > > > > > > Congrats and welcome Houston! > > > > > > -- > > > Ja

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC Chair, Anshum Gupta!

2020-01-17 Thread Karl Wright
Congratulations!! Karl On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 6:37 AM Namgyu Kim wrote: > Congratulations Anshum! :D > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 7:32 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> Congrats Anshum! >> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:17 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar < >> shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Congratulat

Re: Welcome Alessandro Benedetti as a Lucene/Solr committer

2020-03-18 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome, Alessandro! Karl On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 9:01 AM David Smiley wrote: > Hi all, > > Please join me in welcoming Alessandro Benedetti as the latest Lucene/Solr > committer! > > Alessandro has been contributing to Lucene and Solr in areas such as More > Like This, Synonym boosting, and Sug

Re: Welcome Eric Pugh as a Lucene/Solr committer

2020-04-06 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome, Eric! On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:52 AM Steve Rowe wrote: > Congrats and welcome Eric! > > -- > Steve > > > On Apr 6, 2020, at 8:21 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Please join me in welcoming Eric Pugh as the latest Lucene/Solr > committer! > > > > Eric has been part of th

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

2020-05-12 Thread Karl Wright
+1 from me (binding) Karl On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:54 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Regards, > > Atri > > On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 13:07, Dawid Weiss wrote: > >> Dear Lucene and Solr developers! >> >> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am >> calling for a

Re: Welcome Gus Heck as Lucene/Solr committer

2018-11-02 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome!! Karl On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:53 PM Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Welcome Gus! > > Koji > > On 2018/11/01 21:22, David Smiley wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please join me in welcoming Gus Heck as the latest Lucene/Solr committer! > > > > Congratulations and Welcome, Gus! > > > > Gus, it's tradi

Re: Welcome Tim Allison as a Lucene/Solr committer

2018-11-05 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome! Karl On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:39 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > Welcome Tim! > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 11/02/18 16:20:52 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Welcome Tim Allison as a Lucene/Solr committer > > Hi all, > > > Plea

Re: Congratulations to the new Apache Solr PMC Chair, Jan Høydahl!

2021-02-20 Thread Karl Wright
Congratulations! Karl On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 6:28 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Congrats Jan! > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* Anshum Gupta > *Sent:* Thursday, February 18, 2021 7:5

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene PMC Chair, Michael Sokolov!

2021-02-20 Thread Karl Wright
Congratulations! On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Namgyu Kim wrote: > Congratulations, Mike! :D > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:32 AM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> Every year, the Lucene PMC rotates the Lucene PMC chair and Apache Vice >> President position. >> >> This year we nominated and elected

Re: Welcome Nhat Nguyen as Lucene/Solr committer

2018-06-18 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome!! Karl On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 4:42 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Hi all, > > Please join me in welcoming Nhat Nguyen as the latest Lucene/Solr > committer. > Nhat, it's tradition for you to introduce yourself with a brief bio. > > Congratulations and Welcome! > > Adrien >

Solr examples with long metadata needed

2018-09-26 Thread Karl Wright
Hi ManifoldCF Community, I need one or two concrete examples of solr [INFO] log messages that include very long metadata (>8192). This is apparently critical for getting the SolrJ team to be able to understand ManifoldCF's usage of solr. If you have such examples around, please be sure that the

Re: Solr examples with long metadata needed

2018-09-26 Thread Karl Wright
p;literal.attributes=32&literal.viewing_conditions=view+(0x76696577):+36+bytes&literal.profile_description=sRGB+IEC61966-2.1&literal.exif_image_width=3840+pixels&literal.shareName=OCR&literal.viewing_conditions_description=Reference+Viewing+Condition+in+IEC61966-2.1&literal.image_hei

Re: Welcome Ignacio Vera to the PMC

2019-03-04 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome, Ignacio! Karl On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:51 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Ignacio! > > > On 4 Mar 2019, at 09:09, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I am pleased to announce that Ignacio Vera has accepted the PMC's > > invitation to join. > > > > Welcome Ignacio! > > >

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov as Lucene/ Solr committer

2019-05-13 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome, Michael! Karl On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 4:52 PM Martin Gainty wrote: > Удачи Майкл! > > > -- > *From:* Erick Erickson > *Sent:* Monday, May 13, 2019 4:11 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov as Lucene/ Solr committer > > W

How are you supposed to send multipart form requests using SolrJ now?

2018-09-21 Thread Karl Wright
Hi all, With the release of 7.4, several things changed inside Solrj. One critical thing that changed was that it now seems to be impossible to send POST requests with multipart form encoding. This functionality is critical to ManifoldCF since the metadata it sends to Solr regularly exceeds URL

Re: How are you supposed to send multipart form requests using SolrJ now?

2018-09-21 Thread Karl Wright
I should also mention that Solr Cell makes use of the multipart form's separator name. This functionality seems to be unavailable through the URL. We have a number of clients who rely on this. Karl On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:15 AM Karl Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > With the

Re: How are you supposed to send multipart form requests using SolrJ now?

2018-09-22 Thread Karl Wright
sion and possibly even a blocker for the next > version. Unless there is a workaround that is quite non-intuitive. > > Regards, >Alex. > > On 21 September 2018 at 11:43, Karl Wright wrote: > > I should also mention that Solr Cell makes use of the multipart form's &g

Re: How are you supposed to send multipart form requests using SolrJ now?

2018-09-24 Thread Karl Wright
ams == null || isMultipart) { 203bbf504a3 (Alan Woodward 2015-03-26 10:42:22 + 416) // send server list and request list as query string params ... <<<<<< The introduction of RequestWriter essentially prevented use of streams and multipart EXCEPT when there was no Reques

Re: How are you supposed to send multipart form requests using SolrJ now?

2018-09-24 Thread Karl Wright
oldCF release cycle happening now. If there is something I've missed and there is a good way to accomplish this in SolrJ, please let me know. I also tried to tag Paul Nobel in the ticket but Jira does not recognize that name. Karl On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 4:01 AM Karl Wright wrote: > Ok, th

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC chair, Cassandra Targett

2018-12-31 Thread Karl Wright
Congratulations! On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 5:20 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > Heavy is the head that wears the crown - congrats and thank you! And > here's to a peaceful transition of power in the new year :) > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 1:39 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > > > Congratulations, Cassandra

Re: [DISCUSS] Geo/spatial organization in Lucene

2018-06-22 Thread Karl Wright
The abstractions in spatial3d are not the same abstractions as you find in spatial, and yet they sound similar. So I'd worry that if we threw them together we'd be setting ourselves up for a shotgun marriage at some point. I would strongly disagree that that was in any way a good idea. The funda

Re: [DISCUSS] Geo/spatial organization in Lucene

2018-06-22 Thread Karl Wright
Sorry, I just returned from an overseas trip. I'll try to put some thought into a cogent response when I get a little less scrambled. Karl On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:16 PM David Smiley wrote: > Nick, are you not only arguing for spatial code to be in Lucene core, but > also for the "spatial" m

Re: [DISCUSS] Geo/spatial organization in Lucene

2018-06-23 Thread Karl Wright
Data points: (1) For both geo3d and Robert's implementation (at least!) there exists a public API already. For geo3d, this consists of: drwxrwxrwx 0 root root 512 Jun 19 02:47 geom -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5586 Jun 19 02:47 PointInGeo3DShapeQuery.java -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4940 Jun 19 02:47 G

Re: [DISCUSS] Geo/spatial organization in Lucene

2018-06-25 Thread Karl Wright
ferences to the planar > universe. That only make sense if those shapes are generic and are in core. > > > > Ignacio > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, June 24, 2018 7:10 AM > *To:* Lucene/Solr

Re: [DISCUSS] Geo/spatial organization in Lucene

2018-06-25 Thread Karl Wright
still is in the core together with the planar implementation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, June 25, 2018 12:38 PM > *To:* Lucene/Solr dev > *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSS] Geo/spatial organ

Re: [DISCUSS] Geo/spatial organization in Lucene

2018-06-25 Thread Karl Wright
+1 On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:46 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018, 11:32 AM Ignacio Vera Sequeiros > wrote: > >> +1 >> -- >> *From:* Alan Woodward >> *Sent:* Monday, June 25, 2018 5:56:16 PM >> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org >> >> *Subject:* Re:

Potential contribution: Geo 3d package

2015-01-22 Thread Karl Wright
valuable addition, and would like me to create a ticket and attach a patch, please respond. Thanks, Karl Wright

Re: Potential contribution: Geo 3d package

2015-01-22 Thread Karl Wright
eloper > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > >> I would like to explore contributing a geo3d package to Lucene. This can >> be used in conjunction with Lucene search, both for generating geohashes >> (via spat

Re: Potential contribution: Geo 3d package

2015-01-22 Thread Karl Wright
I should make it clear: geo3d does not do geo hashing by itself -- it simply provides support for determining relationships between shapes and traditional bounding boxes, which is what Spatial4J needs to support Lucene geo hashing. Karl On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >

Re: Potential contribution: Geo 3d package

2015-01-22 Thread Karl Wright
to make it abundantly clear I’m a strong +1 to this based on what > you’ve had to say so far. > > ~ David Smiley > Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > &

Re: Potential contribution: Geo 3d package

2015-01-22 Thread Karl Wright
Hi David, I think you may be thinking of QTM. This package does not use QTM because spatial4j's geo hash generation uses lat/lon bounding boxes. ;-) See LUCENE-6196. Karl On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi David, > > What I'm open-sourcing is the com

Question about sending parameters to Solr via SolrJ when SolrCloud is involved

2018-04-25 Thread Karl Wright
ManifoldCF uses SolrJ to send documents to Solr. There are two possible models you can configure for the documents themselves -- either using the extracting update handler, or using the standard SolrClient.add(SolrInputDocument). This occurs in the context of either stand-alone Solr, or Solr Clou

Re: Friendly reminder: please run precommit

2018-04-26 Thread Karl Wright
How long does precommit take you to run? For me, it's a good 25 minutes. That really impacts turnaround, which is why I'd love a precommit that looked only at certain things in the local package I'm dealing with. Karl On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:14 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > Hey folks, > > I h

Re: Friendly reminder: please run precommit

2018-04-26 Thread Karl Wright
not changing third party dependencies or anything "heavy" > like that you should at least run "ant documentation-lint" from > lucene/ > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > > How long does precommit take you to run? For me, it's a

Re: Friendly reminder: please run precommit

2018-04-26 Thread Karl Wright
; precommit before committing. you don't have to sit and watch it, you >> can go work on something else while it runs. >> >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Karl Wright wrote: >> > :-) >> > >> > 25 minutes is an eternity these days, Robert. T

Re: [1/2] lucene-solr:master: LUCENE-8245: Add more tests that demonstrate problems with GeoComplexPolygon.

2018-04-10 Thread Karl Wright
git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/commit/ >> 661fdf3a >> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/tree/661fdf3a >> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/diff/661fdf3a >> >> Branch: refs/heads/master >> Commit: 661fd

Re: Precommit failures

2018-04-12 Thread Karl Wright
I've been having inconsistent runs of precommit. Sometimes it complains, sometimes not. But easily fixed -- I'll push javadoc now. Karl On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > I'm getting this precommit failure on a fresh clone of master: > > -documentation-lint: > > [ec

Re: Test failures are out of control......

2018-02-27 Thread Karl Wright
I looked at the Geo3d failures; these are timeouts exclusively. I suspect we're seeing a test issue. Will try to correct. Karl On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > : The most interesting bit is probably here... > : > : http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-repo

Re: Test failures are out of control......

2018-02-27 Thread Karl Wright
t this to fail locally, we can turn it back > on on Jenkins as long as it's getting active attention. > > Erick > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > > I looked at the Geo3d failures; these are timeouts exclusively. I > suspect > >

Re: ivy-versions broken in e3032dd3fcc

2018-03-02 Thread Karl Wright
ant precommit is usually broken on windows whenever I try to run it, usually because of some failure checking Solr doc sources. I raised this issue a few months back and it got fixed briefly but only very briefly. ant precommit is essentially not an option for Windows developers at this time. Ka

Re: ivy-versions broken in e3032dd3fcc

2018-03-02 Thread Karl Wright
I use git for many projects and most of them don't require that, so it leaves me at a bit of a disadvantage. Karl On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > ant precommit is essentially not an option for Windows developers > > I'm on Windows (and in Linux) and I'm able to use it. J

Re: ivy-versions broken in e3032dd3fcc

2018-03-02 Thread Karl Wright
Just tried this. Had to delete my entire local repo. And now I can't rebuild it either -- the standard git clone command gets an SSL error. :-( Offline until further notice. Karl On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > I use git for many projects and most of them don&#

Re: ivy-versions broken in e3032dd3fcc

2018-03-02 Thread Karl Wright
The instructions here are no longer valid, FWIW: https://lucene.apache.org/core/developer.html Karl On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Just tried this. > Had to delete my entire local repo. And now I can't rebuild it either -- > the standard git clone comma

Re: Welcome Cao Mạnh Đạt to the PMC

2018-04-02 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome! Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > Welcome Đạt! > > * *Anshum > > > > > On Apr 2, 2018, at 12:50 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > Fixing the subject of the email. > > Le lun. 2 avr. 2018 à 21:48, Adrien Grand a écrit : > >> I am pleased to announce that Cao Mạnh Đạ

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-7.x - Build # 549 - Failure

2018-04-05 Thread Karl Wright
Fix committed for the dangling Ignore import. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:39 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-7.x/549/ > > All tests passed > > Build Log: > [...truncated 52933 lines...] > -ecj-javadoc-lint-te

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1785 - Failure!

2018-04-05 Thread Karl Wright
Fix committed for the dangling Ignore import. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1785/ > Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC > > All tests passed > > B

Re: Welcome Nick Knize as Lucene/Solr committer

2015-10-22 Thread Karl Wright
Congratulations on joining the Lucene team! Karl On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Welcome, Nick! > > We were so close last week while many of us were at the Lucene Revolution > in Austin, TX. You got mentioned and big kudos during David Smiley’s geo > talk - it’s great t

Re: Moving Lucene / Solr from SVN to Git

2016-01-10 Thread Karl Wright
Hi Dawid, The problem I've had with Git is not that the basic model is hard to understand -- it's that the basic model seems inadequate for many things, so there's been a huge proliferation of mysterious switches that are poorly documented and also very very powerful. svn has a few of these, but

RE: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6578) Geo3d: arcDistanceToShape() method may be useful

2015-06-27 Thread Karl Wright
578 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: modules/spatial >Reporter: Karl Wright > Attachments: LUCENE-6578.patch, LUCENE-6578.patch > > > I've got an application that seems like it may need the ability to com

RE: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6578) Geo3d: arcDistanceToShape() method may be useful

2015-06-27 Thread Karl Wright
Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: modules/spatial >Reporter: Karl Wright > Attachments: LUCENE-6578.patch, LUCENE-6578.patch > > > I've got an application that seems like it may need the ability to compute a > new ki

Re: Welcome Karl Wright as a Lucene/Solr committer!

2016-04-04 Thread Karl Wright
module. I intend to continue to contribute to this package for the foreseeable future. Thanks!! Karl On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Karl Wright has accepted the Lucene PMC's > invita

Re: lucene-solr:master: LUCENE-7157: Update API javadoc and Polygon method visibilities

2016-04-04 Thread Karl Wright
: > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/commit/ed6f2b0d > > Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/tree/ed6f2b0d > > Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr/diff/ed6f2b0d > > > > Branch: refs/heads/master > > Commit: ed

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-master - Build # 6234 - Still Failing!

2016-04-04 Thread Karl Wright
; Git bisect says: > > —— > 0843e95f0c6661eaa8db372deb06318da1cfe9d2 is the first bad commit > commit 0843e95f0c6661eaa8db372deb06318da1cfe9d2 > Author: Karl Wright > Date: Sun Apr 3 09:43:11 2016 -0400 > —— > > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > >

Re: Welcome Karl Wright as a Lucene/Solr committer!

2016-04-04 Thread Karl Wright
Thanks to all for the warm welcome!! I am honored to be a part of this team. Karl On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Welcome Karl! > > Koji > > > On 2016/04/04 23:28, Michael McCandless wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Karl Wrig

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 70 - Still Failing!

2016-04-12 Thread Karl Wright
Wish this had forensics... Anyway, I can reproduce it, will look at it today. Karl On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hmm it reproduces: > > ant test -Dtestcase=TestGeo3DPoint -Dtests.method=testGeo3DRelations > -Dtests.seed=3B0F8F9FC5B

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_92) - Build # 16779 - Failure!

2016-05-18 Thread Karl Wright
LUCENE-7290 Karl On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/16779/ > Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_92 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: org.apache.lucene.spatial3d.TestGeo3D

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+118) - Build # 16783 - Still Failing!

2016-05-19 Thread Karl Wright
All of these sorts of failures are covered under LUCENE-7290. Karl On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/16783/ > Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+118 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelG

Re: Welcome Scott Blum as a Lucene/Solr committer!

2016-04-19 Thread Karl Wright
Welcome, Scott! Karl On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another welcome...from NYC subway ;) > > Otis > > On Apr 19, 2016, at 05:21, Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Scott Blum has accepted the Lucene PMC's > in

Re: [jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7233) NPE in Geo3dRptTest.testOperations()

2016-04-19 Thread Karl Wright
I checked in a fix. Karl On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Steve Rowe (JIRA) wrote: > Steve Rowe created LUCENE-7233: > -- > > Summary: NPE in Geo3dRptTest.testOperations() > Key: LUCENE-7233 > URL: https://issues.apa

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+120) - Build # 797 - Failure!

2016-06-01 Thread Karl Wright
Created LUCENE-7310 for this failure. Karl On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/797/ > Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+120 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC > > 1 tests failed. > FA

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_92) - Build # 807 - Still Failing!

2016-06-02 Thread Karl Wright
Created LUCENE-7312 for this. Karl On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/807/ > Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_92 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: > org.apache.lucene.spati

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Tests-MMAP-master - Build # 93 - Failure

2016-06-04 Thread Karl Wright
Created LUCENE-7316 to cover this. Karl On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Tests-MMAP-master/93/ > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: org.apache.lucene.spatial3d.TestGeo3DPoint.testGeo3DRelations > >

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC Chair, Tommaso Teofili

2016-06-15 Thread Karl Wright
Congratulations, Tommaso!! Karl On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > Buona Fortuna Tommaso! > > Martini > __ > > > -- > From: luc...@mikemccandless.com > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:36:54 -0400 > Subject:

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2270 - Failure!

2015-05-06 Thread Karl Wright
Ok, let me know if there still seems to be a problem after that. Karl On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:43 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com < david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > This turned out to be a bug in the test infrastructure that Geo3d uses, > copied from Spatial4j: Permalink >

Re: [CI] Lucene 5x Linux Java8 64 Test Only - Build # 46430 - Failure!

2015-05-11 Thread Karl Wright
If you're asking me, I don't know; David supplied the randomized test framework. Karl On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Dawid Weiss > wrote: > >> >> > Hmm odd that test-framework did not print the "Reproduce with: ..." >> line here >>

Re: Review Request 33114: LUCENE-6196 Geo3D

2015-04-12 Thread Karl Wright
they are in fact in radians in the geo3d package. - Karl Wright On April 12, 2015, 7:02 p.m., David Smiley wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

branch_6x does not build

2017-06-29 Thread Karl Wright
Problem is the following lines: >> acf30220 solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/SolrCore.java (Erick Erickson2017-04-12 21:55:52 -0700 2835) if (coreContainer != null) { acf30220 solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/SolrCore.java (Erick Erickson2017

Re: branch_6x does not build

2017-06-29 Thread Karl Wright
37 source files to /home/mikhail_khludnev@epam. > com/lucene-solr/solr/build/solr-core/classes/test > > [javac] /home/mikhail_khlud...@epam.com/lucene-solr/solr/core/src/ > test/org/apache/solr/cloud/BasicDistributedZkTest.java:587: error: cannot > find symbol > > [javac]

Re: branch_6x does not build

2017-06-29 Thread Karl Wright
s UnloadDistributedZkTest > >> > >> [javac] > >> /home/mikhail_khlud...@epam.com/lucene-solr/solr/core/src/ > test/org/apache/solr/cloud/UnloadDistributedZkTest.java:383: > >> error: cannot find symbol > >> > >> [javac] JettySolrRunner jetty = jettys

Solr macro expansion -- interfering with ManifoldCF posts?

2017-06-14 Thread Karl Wright
Hi all, I've got a ManifoldCF user who is posting content to Solr using the MCF Solr output connector. This connector uses SolrJ under the covers -- a fairly recent version -- but also has overridden some classes to insure that multipart form posts will be used for most content. The problem is t

Re: Solr macro expansion -- interfering with ManifoldCF posts?

2017-06-14 Thread Karl Wright
Is there some kind of “${…” > being sent as a parameter? Just curious what’s getting you into this in > the first place. But disabling probably is your most desired solution. > > Erik > > > > On Jun 14, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > > > > Hi all, &

Fwd: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-03 Thread Karl Wright
Getting this output: ... [source-patterns] Unescaped symbol "->" on line #84: solr/solr-ref-guide/src/res ponse-writers.adoc [source-patterns] Unescaped symbol "->" on line #185: solr/solr-ref-guide/src/re sponse-writers.adoc [source-patterns] Unescaped symbol "->" on line #87: solr/solr-ref-guide

Re: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-03 Thread Karl Wright
of date perhaps? > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > > > > Getting this output: > > > > ... > > [source-patterns] Unescaped symbol "->" on line #84: > > solr/solr-ref-guide/src/res > > ponse-writers.adoc > > [sourc

Re: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-03 Thread Karl Wright
rm? > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Aug 3, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > > > > 'When I run `ant precommit` on master on my machine, I don't get those > > errors. Is your branch out of date perhaps?' > > > > This

Re: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-03 Thread Karl Wright
e in the groovy script… On windows some regex > using \n or similar won’t match…. > > > > I will check on my system. > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >

Re: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-03 Thread Karl Wright
1.8.0_45 didn't work either; downloading _144 now (will take a while). Karl On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Thanks, I'll update. > > Karl > > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> Oh, I think I know: >>

Re: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-03 Thread Karl Wright
_144 also doesn't work for me. Looking at one of the .adoc files, the checkout has CR/LF at the end of the line, right after the "->" eg: Is your git configured to checkout in native format? Karl On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > 1.8.0_

Re: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-04 Thread Karl Wright
x (I don’t fully > understand what the check should do!). > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]

Re: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-05 Thread Karl Wright
h > a carriage return (without the DOTALL option). > > I committed a fix: I add a call to trim() on each line coming out of > split. Worked for me. > > Karl, please let me know if this doesn’t fix it for you. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Aug 4,

Re: ant precommit failing due to the solr dev guide

2017-08-06 Thread Karl Wright
atches() with this regex), which passed all of > "-validate-source-patterns" with all .adoc files. Please try again. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > >> Hi Steve, it still did not work for

Re: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6759) Integrate lat/long BKD and spatial 3d, part 2

2015-08-25 Thread Karl Wright
This one is different. Basically, this time the XYZSolid is *definitely* within the GeoCircle. So the membership operation between the point and the circle is failing but should not be. Evaluating the circle plane at the point yields: 1.1158007851008733E-10, which is indeed outside the shape val

Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?

2015-06-09 Thread Karl Wright
There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.

Re: NASA/JPL's involvement in Memex: now public

2015-05-27 Thread Karl Wright
The name "Memex" is, I think, already in use by a company that was bought out by Autonomy some years ago, and thence by HP. I presume this is *not* what you are talking about? Thanks, Karl On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hey F

RE: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6487) Add WGS84 capability to geo3d support

2015-05-30 Thread Karl Wright
Ok, what I find is that because the arc distance is in effect taking a square root, instead of 1e-12 the error should always be 1e-6. That is just the way the math works. Karl Sent from my Windows Phone From: Karl Wright (JIRA) Sent: 5/30/2015 6:22 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2377 - Failure!

2015-06-03 Thread Karl Wright
There is already a check for a degenerate path segment. This is happening because the endpoints that define two path segments are co-linear. There's a check for that too, but clearly it's not firing properly in this case for some reason. I'll have to look deeper when I have a chance. It may be

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2377 - Failure!

2015-06-03 Thread Karl Wright
I posted a fix on the review board. Basically, the change replaces the current colinearity check with one directly related to the computation of the segment endpoint plane. Karl On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > There is already a check for a degenerate path segm

Re: jhighlight-1.0 contains LGPL-only files

2015-03-26 Thread Karl Wright
ress on TIKA-1581, but >> it doesn't look like it's going to be resolved that soon. >> > > >> > > Shai >> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Karl Wright >> wrote: >> > > I suspect that the classes

SolrJ 5.x compatibility with Solr 4.x

2015-03-27 Thread Karl Wright
Hi, Now that Solr 5.0.0 has been released, the ManifoldCF project needs to figure out the appropriate time to upgrade to a newer SolrJ. Can anyone point me at the backwards-compatibility policy for SolrJ 5.0.0? Will it work properly with Solr 4.x? Thanks in advance, Karl

Re: SolrJ 5.x compatibility with Solr 4.x

2015-03-27 Thread Karl Wright
really aren't able to re-release code on the same schedule as Lucene, and cannot be expected to support multiple SolrJ libraries simultaneously. Karl On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 3/27/2015 2:29 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > > Now that Solr 5.0.0 has been

Re: jhighlight-1.0 contains LGPL-only files

2015-03-20 Thread Karl Wright
I have created a ticket: TIKA-1581. ManifoldCF also has a Tika dependency, so thank you for noting the problem. Karl On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Upayavira wrote: > You are right -both projects need to remove it, although it might be > easier to work with Tika to fix that and then upgrade

Re: jhighlight-1.0 contains LGPL-only files

2015-03-20 Thread Karl Wright
ink we should remove it, whether Tika > corrects the problem or not. We can put a note in our NOTICE file for users > to download the jar themselves until Tika fixes the problem. > > If people agree, I will remove it from our code. > > Shai > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:40 AM

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >