web.xml
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de>
>
> From: Uwe Schindler
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 6:44 PM
> T
:44 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] SIP-6 Solr should own the bootstrap process
Hi,
I agree, this should be a change in 9.0 only.
In general we can start with web.xml still existing (the bootstrap code would
use a Jetty “WebAppContext” initially). At a later stage
From: Mike Drob
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 6:07 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SIP-6 Solr should own the bootstrap process
I think we like to pretend that Jetty and web.xml are implementation details,
but I'm not sure how good of a job we do.
Whether we need
] SIP-6 Solr should own the bootstrap process
Would being able to manage CORS settings be part of this?
Now that Solr is ramping up it’s default security posture, there are many
applications that used to work that don’t. Today, changing Solr’s CORS
settings is very cumbersome, requiring
I think we like to pretend that Jetty and web.xml are implementation
details, but I'm not sure how good of a job we do.
Whether we need to provide backwards compatibility or not is the wrong
question I think, because when we break compatibility we are telling a
subset of our users that it will
Would being able to manage CORS settings be part of this?
Now that Solr is ramping up it’s default security posture, there are many
applications that used to work that don’t. Today, changing Solr’s CORS
settings is very cumbersome, requiring changing an embedded web.xml.
Making it easier to
I agree. I changed the SIP page and now have four bullet points defined as in
scope for the SIP:
> The most important change in this SIP will be
> Create a solr/bootstrap module with a solr.jar to replace start.jar as the
> entrypoint (java -jar solr.jar ...)
> Hide jetty even more, i.e.
I'm in favor of this approach mainly because of the line mentioned in the
Test Plan:
> If we move servlet initialization into Java code and get rid of web.xml,
we may be able to start Solr in the same way both in tests and in real life!
I feel that this should be a top level goal, along with
