Figured it out and downgraded to a trivial bug.
-Yonik
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
I've set this as a blocker until we know more about the actual impact.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7917
-Yonik
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:49 PM,
I opened SOLR-7909 yesterday as blocker to flag that ZK ACL cannot be setup
through VM-params as documented. The fix looks simple, but an alternative for
5.3 is to change the documentation since there is a known workaround using
solr.xml. Will do some testing.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution
Yeah, sorry Mike. I wasn't sure of the protocol here. I'll keep that
in mind from the next time.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I'm confused: this issue
I'm done with the blockers.
Planning to cut an RC soon.
--Noble
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, sorry Mike. I wasn't sure of the protocol here. I'll keep that
in mind from the next time.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Michael
I knew things were stalled so I slipped SOLR-7900 in to 5.3. (this is
example/files stuff that is soon to be publicized more, so wanted to be sure
the latest stuff made it to next release).
—
Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
http://www.lucidworks.com http://www.lucidworks.com/
I reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7838
Need to incorporate the syntax changes. I'll cut the firs release
candidate after that
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
I knew things were stalled so I slipped SOLR-7900 in to 5.3. (this is
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I'm confused: this issue isn't a blocker? Why are we holding up a
: release for non-blocker issues?
If i understand correctly, SOLR-7838 is (part of) a feature and by
definition not a blocker -- but after
: I'm confused: this issue isn't a blocker? Why are we holding up a
: release for non-blocker issues?
If i understand correctly, SOLR-7838 is (part of) a feature and by
definition not a blocker -- but after being committed Shalin noticed that
the syntax of the user facing API introduced in
I'm confused: this issue isn't a blocker? Why are we holding up a
release for non-blocker issues?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7838
Need to
I've committed a trivial logging/nocommit statement removal (SOLR-7911). I
hope that is ok.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to volunteer myself as the RM for 5.3 release. I plan to
cut the 5.3 release branch by next Monday (03/Aug).
Ok. Many thanks!
I was not sure, I think I removed the workspaces using the Gui after disabling
them. I just wanted to be sure we not run out of disk space.
Uwe
Am 7. August 2015 21:02:39 MESZ, schrieb Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com:
On Aug 7, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com
On Aug 7, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 5, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Steve: For ASF Jenkins, it would be ideal to rename the preexisting 5.2
jobs and simply change the branch in the subversion settings. Before doing
that, be
On Aug 5, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Uwe, I don’t think renaming the preexisting 5.2 jobs is ideal, because
preexisting release branch jobs can have stale config (inactive jobs’ configs
don’t always get updated when other jobs’ configs do). When setting up
I have merged/committed SOLR-7877 and SOLR-7766 to lucene_solr_5_3 branch.
cwiki.apache.org also updated now w.r.t. SOLR-7766.
--Christine
- Original Message -
From: dev@lucene.apache.org
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: sar...@gmail.com, u...@thetaphi.de
At: Aug 5 2015 16:10:09
I have
Noble Paul [2015-08-05 17:09]:
If anything new must go into 5.3 release please communicate it
here
What are the chances of getting the second patch from SOLR-7639
included in this release? It adds the missing pieces (support for
the `boost` parameter and exclusion of the current document from
I just committed this to trunk and the lucene_5x branch. However, when I
attempted to commit it to the lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_5_3
branch, I got this error:
svn: E175013: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden
(http://svn.apache.org)
svn:
This should work without error 503. Maybe a temporary problem with subversion
server?
Uwe
Am 6. August 2015 11:49:25 MESZ, schrieb Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk:
I just committed this to trunk and the lucene_5x branch. However, when
I
attempted to commit it to the
Eeeks. Cause is obvious actually. The checkout I made of 5.3 was http,
not https. Will make my commit now.
Upayavira
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Upayavira wrote:
Yes, it *should* work. Hopefully someone'll make the commit whilst I
ask on infra@ to understand why this is breaking.
Thx!
Yes, it *should* work. Hopefully someone'll make the commit whilst I ask
on infra@ to understand why this is breaking.
Thx!
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
This should work without error 503. Maybe a temporary problem with
subversion server?
Uwe
Am 6. August 2015
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7692 is slated to be a part
of 5.3 . I'm wrapping it up.
As you suggested , it makes sense to cut a branch and stabilize stuff.
I shall cut a branch as soon as possible
I guess there could be other things too.
--Noble
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:55 PM,
Hi Noble,
I've just now committed SOLR-7818 and SOLR-7756. Both were bug fixes. I'm
done from my side for 5.3
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7692 is slated to be a part
of 5.3 . I'm wrapping it up.
As you
I have created the lucene_solr_5_3 branch.
If anything new must go into 5.3 release please communicate it here
and commit to the new branch as well
@uwe, @sarowe , can someone help me setup jenkins for the same.
--Noble
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Varun Thacker
varunthacker1...@gmail.com
I can work on setting up 5.3 release branch jobs on ASF Jenkins later today if
Uwe doesn’t beat me to it. - Steve
On Aug 5, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I have created the lucene_solr_5_3 branch.
If anything new must go into 5.3 release please communicate it
I need to update CHANGES.txt to account for a number of bug fixes to the
angular UI. I'll add a single entry to account for them all.
Upayavira
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015, at 04:15 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
I can work on setting up 5.3 release branch jobs on ASF Jenkins later
today if Uwe doesn’t beat me
Which is the JIRA?
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I need to update CHANGES.txt to account for a number of bug fixes to the
angular UI. I'll add a single entry to account for them all.
Upayavira
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015, at 04:15 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
I can
I have opened this ticket to track the test failures
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7877
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is the JIRA?
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I need to update CHANGES.txt to
Figured out the SOLR-7877 issue, patch to follow.
- Original Message -
From: dev@lucene.apache.org
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
At: Aug 5 2015 18:39:45
I have opened this ticket to track the test failures
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7877
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:04 PM,
.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 5:16 PM
To: Lucene Dev
Cc: Uwe Schindler; Noble Paul
Subject: Re: 5.3 release
I can work on setting up 5.3
Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 5:16 PM
To: Lucene Dev
Cc: Uwe Schindler; Noble Paul
Subject: Re: 5.3 release
I can work on setting up 5.3 release branch jobs on ASF Jenkins later today
if
Uwe doesn’t beat me to it. - Steve
On Aug 5, 2015, at 11:09 AM
Hi Noble,
Which changes are delaying the branch creation? Even if everything
that we want for 5.3 is not ready yet, it could be useful to create
the branch now to help stabilize it? We could still merge the changes
we want in after the branch is created.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Noble
I may have to push the branch by a day or two. There are some more
loose ends to be tied up from my side. Sorry for the trouble
--Noble
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to releasing 5.3, and thanks for volunteering!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:56 AM,
+1 to releasing 5.3, and thanks for volunteering!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to volunteer myself as the RM for 5.3 release. I plan to
cut the 5.3 release branch by next Monday (03/Aug).
--
32 matches
Mail list logo
