RE: Solrconfig in zookeeper
Solr already stores this configuration items in Zookeeper? - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de/ http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Kranti Parisa [mailto:kranti.par...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:03 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solrconfig in zookeeper As Solr 4.5 allows to store solr.xml in zookeeper, any ideas for supporting the same for other config files especially solrconfig.xml? so that we can change the relevance (boosting/scoring) settings, like qf, bf etc, for different request handlers on the fly? Thanks Regards, Kranti K Parisa http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa
Re: Solrconfig in zookeeper
Cool, thanks for the info. I am not using SolrCloud yet, but have plans and this would be another motivation factor. Thanks Regards, Kranti K Parisa http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 9/12/2013 11:02 AM, Kranti Parisa wrote: As Solr 4.5 allows to store solr.xml in zookeeper, any ideas for supporting the same for other config files especially solrconfig.xml? so that we can change the relevance (boosting/scoring) settings, like qf, bf etc, for different request handlers on the fly? Using Zookeeper means that you are using SolrCloud. SolrCloud has kept all core-level configuration (solrconfig.xml, schema.xml, etc) in zookeeper since before its public debut with version 4.0. It already does exactly what you are asking. I think that eventually Solr will move to a point where zookeeper will be required, and basically there will be no SolrCloud distinction - if you're running Solr at all, then you're running SolrCloud. Assuming that I'm right about that, I don't know if it will happen with 5.0 or 6.0. There's a lot of life left in Solr 4.x. Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Solrconfig in zookeeper
On 9/12/2013 11:02 AM, Kranti Parisa wrote: As Solr 4.5 allows to store solr.xml in zookeeper, any ideas for supporting the same for other config files especially solrconfig.xml? so that we can change the relevance (boosting/scoring) settings, like qf, bf etc, for different request handlers on the fly? Using Zookeeper means that you are using SolrCloud. SolrCloud has kept all core-level configuration (solrconfig.xml, schema.xml, etc) in zookeeper since before its public debut with version 4.0. It already does exactly what you are asking. I think that eventually Solr will move to a point where zookeeper will be required, and basically there will be no SolrCloud distinction - if you're running Solr at all, then you're running SolrCloud. Assuming that I'm right about that, I don't know if it will happen with 5.0 or 6.0. There's a lot of life left in Solr 4.x. Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Solrconfig in zookeeper
Question is, what do you want to achieve? What benefit do you see yourself getting from having configs in zookeeper? There may be another way of getting those benefits. Also note, whilst you can upload solrconfig.xml to Zookeeper as a part of SolrCloud, you still need to reload a core to make the changes take effect. Which is much the same as changing the file on disk and reloading the core in a non-SolrCloud setup. So not sure what the benefit might be that you're after. Upayavira On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, at 06:54 PM, Kranti Parisa wrote: Cool, thanks for the info. I am not using SolrCloud yet, but have plans and this would be another motivation factor. Thanks Regards, Kranti K Parisa [1]http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Shawn Heisey [2]s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 9/12/2013 11:02 AM, Kranti Parisa wrote: As Solr 4.5 allows to store solr.xml in zookeeper, any ideas for supporting the same for other config files especially solrconfig.xml? so that we can change the relevance (boosting/scoring) settings, like qf, bf etc, for different request handlers on the fly? Using Zookeeper means that you are using SolrCloud. SolrCloud has kept all core-level configuration (solrconfig.xml, schema.xml, etc) in zookeeper since before its public debut with version 4.0. It already does exactly what you are asking. I think that eventually Solr will move to a point where zookeeper will be required, and basically there will be no SolrCloud distinction - if you're running Solr at all, then you're running SolrCloud. Assuming that I'm right about that, I don't know if it will happen with 5.0 or 6.0. There's a lot of life left in Solr 4.x. Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [3]dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: [4]dev-h...@lucene.apache.org References 1. http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa 2. mailto:s...@elyograg.org 3. mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org 4. mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Solrconfig in zookeeper
The benefit is to update directly on the zookeeper and no need to touch the file system. And functional aspects is what I wrote in my first email, I want to change the default boost values for specific request handlers and I don't want to pass them via the Solr API. Because we have our own REST API which will internally translated into Solr's API and in the process we read lot of configs from solrconfig.xml Thanks Regards, Kranti K Parisa http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: ** Question is, what do you want to achieve? What benefit do you see yourself getting from having configs in zookeeper? There may be another way of getting those benefits. Also note, whilst you can upload solrconfig.xml to Zookeeper as a part of SolrCloud, you still need to reload a core to make the changes take effect. Which is much the same as changing the file on disk and reloading the core in a non-SolrCloud setup. So not sure what the benefit might be that you're after. Upayavira On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, at 06:54 PM, Kranti Parisa wrote: Cool, thanks for the info. I am not using SolrCloud yet, but have plans and this would be another motivation factor. Thanks Regards, Kranti K Parisa http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 9/12/2013 11:02 AM, Kranti Parisa wrote: As Solr 4.5 allows to store solr.xml in zookeeper, any ideas for supporting the same for other config files especially solrconfig.xml? so that we can change the relevance (boosting/scoring) settings, like qf, bf etc, for different request handlers on the fly? Using Zookeeper means that you are using SolrCloud. SolrCloud has kept all core-level configuration (solrconfig.xml, schema.xml, etc) in zookeeper since before its public debut with version 4.0. It already does exactly what you are asking. I think that eventually Solr will move to a point where zookeeper will be required, and basically there will be no SolrCloud distinction - if you're running Solr at all, then you're running SolrCloud. Assuming that I'm right about that, I don't know if it will happen with 5.0 or 6.0. There's a lot of life left in Solr 4.x. Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org