Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

If someone happens to step forward to be a release manager for 6.7, someone (could be the same someone, or someone else) needs to also step forward to do the Ref Guide for 6.7. I'm the one that usually does most of the work for the Solr Ref Guide, and I don't have time in the next 2 months to do

Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

Le jeu. 10 août 2017 à 15:52, Erick Erickson a écrit : > I've never understood this. Why? I realize we don't want to keep > release 6.x forever, but what is it about a week in this case that's > so horrible? We're not talking about introducing back-compat issues > here.

Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

Well, unfortunately I'm headed off on a 10 day vacation next week. Mostly I'm trying to make sure we make a conscious decision about 6.7 rather than just let it slide until after 7.0 then regret not putting the effort in now. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Anshum Gupta

Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

Just out of curiosity, do we have a plan here? Erick, I assume you are willing to work on the release? As much as I am not convinced with the idea of the 6.7 release, I wouldn't oppose it and would want to work with whoever is the release manager. -Anshum On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:52 AM Erick

Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

I've never understood this. Why? I realize we don't want to keep release 6.x forever, but what is it about a week in this case that's so horrible? We're not talking about introducing back-compat issues here. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > Releasing 6.7

Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

Releasing 6.7 means we cannot start the 7.0 release process until 6.7 is out. Do we really want to delay 7.0 even more? I won't object to releasing 6.7 but if we want to do it let's get a vote started today. Le mer. 9 août 2017 à 22:31, Jan Høydahl a écrit : > +1 > > >

Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

+1 > Den 9. aug. 2017 kl. 20.18 skrev David Smiley : > > +1 > I think a 6.7 release would be very good. > >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:46 PM Mike Drob wrote: >> +1 >> >> Release early, release often! >> >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Erick

Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

+1 I think a 6.7 release would be very good. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:46 PM Mike Drob wrote: > +1 > > Release early, release often! > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Erick Erickson > wrote: > >> Solr and Lucene have had fixes backported to 6x (not

Re: What should we do with the 6x code line?

+1 Release early, release often! On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Solr and Lucene have had fixes backported to 6x (not 6.6) since the > 7.0 label was set, most in Solr. Some of the fixes are useful "in the > field", I've back-ported some of them