Re: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-12-15 Thread Wyatt Barnett
achricht- Von: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2016 19:34 An: dev@lucenenet.apache.org Cc: Connie Yau <conn...@microsoft.com>; itamar.synhers...@gmail.com Betreff: RE: Remaining Work/Priorities Update == It has been a while since I have communicat

RE: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-12-15 Thread Shad Storhaug
'dev@lucenenet.apache.org' Cc: 'Connie Yau'; 'cri...@gmail.com'; 'itamar.synhers...@gmail.com' Subject: RE: Remaining Work/Priorities Update == I have just pushed some commits that fix several bugs in the Lucene.Net.Codecs project (all 452 tests pass most of the time, a few random failures) an

RE: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-10-22 Thread Shad Storhaug
6 2:10 AM To: 'dev@lucenenet.apache.org' Cc: 'Connie Yau'; 'cri...@gmail.com'; 'itamar.synhers...@gmail.com' Subject: RE: Remaining Work/Priorities Update == I have just pushed some commits that fix several bugs in the Lucene.Net.Codecs project (all 452 tests pass most of the time, a few ran

RE: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-10-12 Thread Shad Storhaug
AM To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org Subject: Re: Remaining Work/Priorities While on that note, Shad - emails to you bounce with the following error (still): Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: s...@shadstorhaug.com Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver yo

Re: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-10-12 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
ariable in the Codec class internal and swapping in a test double. >> However, that doesn't solve the bigger issue that Lucene.Net is missing its >> extensibility for anyone who wants to write their own codec (or tap into >> one of the other extensibility points). I guess the bi

Re: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-10-11 Thread Shad Storhaug
with that in one step after you > have finished porting. > > -- > > Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888) > > -Original Message- > From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko > Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-10-11 Thread Shad Storhaug
g. Can someone look into that please? Thanks, Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888) -Original Message- From: Shad Storhaug Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 8:23 PM To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org Cc: Connie Yau; 'cri...@gmail.com' Subject: RE: Remaining Work/Priorities > Analysis.ICU (Depends on ICU4j) h

RE: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-10-05 Thread Shad Storhaug
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 5:28 AM To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org Cc: Connie Yau Subject: Re: Remaining Work/Priorities Awesome, thanks for all the hard work Shad! Our first priority should

Re: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-10-04 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Elad, casting is only a compiler hack. Keeping the code as close to it's original Java form is important for many reasons, and as such I think we should avoid making such changes. -- Itamar Syn-Hershko http://code972.com | @synhershko Freelance Developer &

Re: Remaining Work/Priorities

2016-10-04 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Awesome, thanks for all the hard work Shad! Our first priority should be fixing all remaining tests - in particular the one in Core. We should be ready to release and stamp our builds as 100% stable. As you mentioned, this could be an infrastructure issue - hopefully *Connie *can give a status