2008/3/4, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/3/4, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Didn't someone write a linkchecker plugin? :-)
Hehe! It seems that linkchecker was unhappy for some links started with /
It was due that some links were not relative links. I fixed them and
linkcheck is
Only 2 votes +1 (me and brett). So I suppose the vote failed.
What to do now?
Milos
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to the currently released artifacts and tag.
I reviewed the code, checked for license headers and checked the
artifact contents.
+1
not tested, just to release it :)
-Lukas
Milos Kleint wrote:
Only 2 votes +1 (me and brett). So I suppose the vote failed.
What to do now?
Milos
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to the currently released artifacts and tag.
I reviewed the code,
2008/3/5, Milos Kleint [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Only 2 votes +1 (me and brett). So I suppose the vote failed.
What to do now?
Bribe some PMC with beer to have their votes ;-)
Raphaël
Milos
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to the currently released
Hello,
it seems that the metadata that should resolve the plugin prefixes got
wiped out for the org.codehaus.mojo group.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/maven-metadata.xml is
almost empty (last modified on 25 February)
Therefore running mvn nbm:cluster for my nbm-maven-plugin
That's good, but it's better to have an actual IT that gets run too.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 11:09 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope
There is a test in
I'm getting Contegix to grab it from a backup.
Anyone know what happened here?
The sablecc and the jpox-modello plugin are in there. Anyone happen to
do releases of those?
On 5-Mar-08, at 6:25 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
Hello,
it seems that the metadata that should resolve the plugin
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting Contegix to grab it from a backup.
Anyone know what happened here?
The sablecc and the jpox-modello plugin are in there. Anyone happen to
do releases of those?
On 5-Mar-08, at 6:25 AM, Milos Kleint
Hi guys,
To fix an issue (MECLIPSE-395) to build the eclipse plugin with a fully
customized environment, I had to add in surefire these settings :
systemProperties
property
namemaven.home/name
value${maven.home}/value
/property
Hi guys,
I noticed some weird thing on our website.
In the top left it is written : Version: 1.0 - It's certainly the version
of the site project but it is completely useless.
Continuum links already desappeared whereas the TLP web site isn't yet
ready (continuum.apache.org doesn't exit)
Wendy made pages for both CI and Repository Managers. I already took
Continuum off the front page, and it looks like Archiva is leaving too
so that should be taken off the front page and moved to the resource
Wendy made to track them.
On 5-Mar-08, at 8:46 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi
ok fine, I didn't see new entries in the menu.
It's perfect.
thx
Arnaud
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy made pages for both CI and Repository Managers. I already took
Continuum off the front page, and it looks like Archiva is leaving too
so that
I did the jpox one and it was before sablecc. I'll take a look at what
happened.
- Brett
On 06/03/2008, at 2:10 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'm getting Contegix to grab it from a backup.
Anyone know what happened here?
The sablecc and the jpox-modello plugin are in there. Anyone happen
to
I don't quite understand what you mean. You're saying that if the
environment you run your tests in uses those variables, and we run
integration tests that fork Maven, they aren't passed on by default?
It's a bit ugly - it'd be nicer if the test framework took care of
that, but I can see
shouldn't this be on trunk and 1.0.x branch, not on the spring branch?
On 06/03/2008, at 12:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nicolas
Date: Wed Mar 5 05:24:50 2008
New Revision: 633841
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=633841view=rev
Log:
fix inversion between calssifier version
Stage plugin bug maybe?
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 3:09 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: plugin prefix metadata for org.codehaus.mojo got wiped?
I did the jpox one and it was before sablecc. I'll take a look
I doubt we need these for many of the plugins, and the invoker or
SHITTY plugin should deal with. I'd rather not see this foisted on
everyone.
On 5-Mar-08, at 8:30 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi guys,
To fix an issue (MECLIPSE-395) to build the eclipse plugin with a
fully
customized
No - Maven currently looks in mirrored repositories for the metadata
on deployment, which means it was going to my local repository manager
which was configured such that it gave a 404, which meant Maven
thought it should send a new one.
Maven shouldn't go to mirrored repositories to get
Below are the results of the vote:
+16 Binding - Brett, Emmanuel, Jason, Olivier, John C., Vicent S., Dan F.,
Dennis, Fabrice, Wendy, Joakim, Arnaud H., Jesse, Rahul, John T. and myself
+5 Non-binding - Nicolas, Daniel, Nap, Edwin and Franz
Everyone voted +1 so the vote is accepted.
Thanks,
Cool! I will pass this on to the board for the meeting later this month.
Cheers,
Brett
On 05/03/2008, at 8:45 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Below are the results of the vote:
+16 Binding - Brett, Emmanuel, Jason, Olivier, John C., Vicent S.,
Dan F.,
Dennis, Fabrice, Wendy, Joakim, Arnaud H.,
On 05/03/2008, at 9:20 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Cool! I will pass this on to the board for the meeting later this
month.
I will also note that I removed Dennis at his request on the Maven PMC
list - he will remain as a committer but felt his contributions had
not yet been significant
Okay, thanks Brett! :-)
-Deng
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/03/2008, at 9:20 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Cool! I will pass this on to the board for the meeting later this
month.
I will also note that I removed Dennis at his request on the Maven
Hi all,
I read the documentation about repository purge (
http://maven.apache.org/archiva/docs/1.0.1/adminguide/repositories.html) but
I have always a doubt. If I activate both rules to purge the repository
(days older and retention count), archiva will apply both of them thus I can
for example
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can only activate one of them (if the # of days old is 0, then
purge
by # of days old; otherwise, purge by retention count). However, the
24 matches
Mail list logo
