Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Olivier, is there something critical missing? Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then it seemed quite good to me. Regards, Hervé Le mardi 20 avril 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : Ok thx. I agree that we have a good tests

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. Olivier, is there something critical missing? No except some spare time :-) Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I just tried 3 the release build on one of my projects and got the following error message: [ERROR] The project com.tsystems.icto.tom:tom-icto-dependencies:0.2.22-SNAPSHOT

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no. so I would think it is an error on your side On 20 April 2010 08:11, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no.  so I would think it is an error on your side You are right. After changing that the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Brett Porter
On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. Olivier, is there something critical missing? No except some spare time :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
No. It's 3.x prerequisite. 2010/4/20 Brett Porter br...@apache.org: On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. Olivier, is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Paul Merlin
+1 Working here. It's nice to see maven getting closer to the 3.0\o/ /Paul Le lundi 19 avril 2010 19:50:28, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16 089 There are still a couple of issues left

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2010/4/19 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500status=1

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype version 2.0-alpha-5

2010-04-20 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
+1 Tested using Maven 2.2.0 Many thanks to Hervé Regards, Raphaël 2010/4/18 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr Hi, We solved 27 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095version=14254 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype version 2.0-alpha-5

2010-04-20 Thread Brian Fox
Lets move to call the next one a final release or at least a beta. We have too many alphas floating around 2010/4/20 Raphaël Piéroni raf...@apache.org: +1 Tested using Maven 2.2.0 Many thanks to Hervé Regards, Raphaël 2010/4/18 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr Hi, We solved 27

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

2010-04-20 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Milos, I'm not sure if you did the plexus-compiler release in conjunction with this or if that was someone else, but the checksums for it are incorrect (see users@ today for those using The 2.3 release). Do you know what happened? If the JARs are correct maybe we can just fix the checksums

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread John Casey
+1 works well here. On 4/19/10 1:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

2010-04-20 Thread Milos Kleint
hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the checksums became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform combo. I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double checked that there are gpg signatures, but assumed checksums are correct. They