Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > + * discussions on Maven > 3.0.x (3.1 or 3.2 or 3.3? details still TDB) +
> > Java 8 prerequisites
>
> Don't be shy Hervé we can definitely says >= 3.3.9 (at least you will not
> hear any objections from me :) )
looking at our
+1
sob., 23 maj 2020, 09:22 użytkownik Hervé BOUTEMY
napisał:
> Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > > + * discussions on Maven > 3.0.x (3.1 or 3.2 or 3.3? details still
> TDB) +
> > > Java 8 prerequisites
> >
> > Don't be shy Hervé we can definitely says >= 3.3.9
LGTM
Rebasing the code could be great if not too difficult
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:32 PM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Approved on github
>
> +1
> I have run thru the diff.
> It looks very well
>
> Longing for testing it on a real project
>
> The fact that you won't have to commit mave wrapper
+1 (non binding)
Side note:
I see from the diff (good idea!) that we added a new comment with 'TODO'
We should create a JIRA and link to it.
Enrico
Il Sab 23 Mag 2020, 14:12 Robert Scholte ha scritto:
> +1
>
>
> On 23-5-2020 13:03:20, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> LGTM +1
> I did only a code
+1
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:13 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> +1
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Sab 23 Mag 2020, 09:40 Sylwester Lachiewicz ha
> scritto:
>
> > +1
> >
> > sob., 23 maj 2020, 09:22 użytkownik Hervé BOUTEMY >
> > napisał:
> >
> > > Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit :
LGTM +1
I did only a code review using
https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/compare/wagon-3.4.0...wagon-3.4.1
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:45 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122=12348210
>
> There are
As discussed before: compatibility should either be 3.3.1 (since 3.3.0 didn't
make it) or 3.5.0, we should not include the (highest) bugfix version.
Robert
On 23-5-2020 12:43:35, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
+1
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:13 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> +1
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Sab 23
yes, removing this type of code is exactly the objective of updating minimum
Maven version prerequisite to something > 3.0.x
please all share your though on the other email thread on the next level of
compatibility we should put in our plan:
Approved on github
+1
I have run thru the diff.
It looks very well
Longing for testing it on a real project
The fact that you won't have to commit mave wrapper jar to local sources is
great
Enrico
Il Ven 22 Mag 2020, 22:56 Manfred Moser ha
scritto:
> Awesome! +1
>
> Robert Scholte wrote on
ok no worries, it was a nice to have if it wasn't yet on master.
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 1:04 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> On 23.05.20 12:51, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> > LGTM
> > Rebasing the code could be great if not too difficult
>
> Unfortunately the code is already on master
HI,
On 23.05.20 12:51, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
LGTM
Rebasing the code could be great if not too difficult
Unfortunately the code is already on master with all commits
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:32 PM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
Approved on github
+1
I
+1
Enrico
Il Sab 23 Mag 2020, 09:40 Sylwester Lachiewicz ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> sob., 23 maj 2020, 09:22 użytkownik Hervé BOUTEMY
> napisał:
>
> > Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > > > + * discussions on Maven > 3.0.x (3.1 or 3.2 or 3.3? details still
> > TDB) +
To be clear: it is just a bootstrapping issue.
Once all is in place they can both have their own release cycle.
The plugin won't need to be released before every Maven Core release, as it can
pick up the Maven version from the runtime.
It is actually possible to run the plugin with 3.0 if we
Now that maven-wrapper is available in master of maven-core, the next step
would be to make it easy to use.
I've created MNG-6917[1] to make it possible to simply call {{mvn wrapper}}
However, this requires the plugin to be available.
On the other hand, the plugin must be able to download the
Hi Robert,
this is slightly offtopic but since you wrote:
On the other hand, the plugin must be able to download the apache-maven-wrapper
distribution.
Is this integration into Maven also adressing proxy handling for the
download?
I am asking because I had to add special handling to Quarkus
Hi,
We solved 4 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12348077=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1578/
Downloading by the plugin works different compared to the takari-maven-plugin.
The takari-maven-plugin was downloading a URL, whereas the maven-wrapper-plugin
is downloading an artifact using the artifact resolver libraries, so these are
settings.xml-aware.
Would be nice to confirm this.
Robert
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317527=12344185=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1577/
+1
On 23-5-2020 13:03:20, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
LGTM +1
I did only a code review using
https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/compare/wagon-3.4.0...wagon-3.4.1
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:45 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
>
>
Hi,
We solved 13 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317821=12346620
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MPIR/issues
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1579/
Hi Andreas,
I'll do the release: please check that everything is as expected.
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 21 mai 2020, 20:01:37 CEST Andreas Sewe a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> > would it be possible to release the maven-jxr-plugin? The last release
> > is from September 2018 and since then (15 months ago,
elharo opened a new pull request #170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/170
@slachiewicz
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
elharo commented on pull request #170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/170#issuecomment-633090938
This doesn't change that. It just removes mention of Maven 2 from this page
as part of a long effort to purge all Maven 2 from or main docs.
elharo merged pull request #170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/170
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
24 matches
Mail list logo
