Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?

-1 non-binding, this is confusing. That's what RC tags are for. Gary On Jun 2, 2013, at 11:54, Benson Margulies wrote: > -1 binding to changing to burning versions. > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Ralph Goers > wrote: >> -1 (binding) >> >> Ralph >> On May 29, 2013, at 3:01 AM, Stephen Co

Re: Release process updates

For record keeping purposes, the SVN revision + tag combo is better because some RM's have inadvertently reused RC tags in the past. As Sebb pointed out tags are mutable. Gary On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I disagree that the revision is required. I know that the RM is

Re: Release process updates

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Again I have to disagree. The release manager will send an email closing > the prior release. At this point all the prior release artifacts are junk > even if they still exist. At some point the release manager will delete > the tag and reru

Re: Release process updates

2, etc after a failed > release vote instead of deleting them. > > > > > > On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Ralph Goers < > ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote: > >> > >>> Again I have

Re: Release process updates

oers wrote: Yeah - I agree with this. I rename them to rc1, rc2, etc after a failed release vote instead of deleting them. On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Ralph Goers < ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote: Again I have to disagree.

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

Fine with me. Thanks for the explanation sebb. Gary On Jun 30, 2013, at 14:20, sebb wrote: > The mission of the ASF is to release software as source, and to ensure > that the released source is available under the Apache Licence. > > Before a release can be approved it must be voted on by the P

Re: Java version usage survey

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Hi, > > Java 6 EOL was in feb and Maven and its plugins are always compatible > with Java 5 (And probably various plugins with Java 4). > Couldn't it be interesting to see which JDKs our users are using to see > how we can schedule the

3.1.0 and java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError

If you check out log4j 2 trunk and run: mvn clean site, you get a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError. Shouldn't this work out of the box? All is well with 3.0.5. Should I configure something magic or create a JIRA? [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO]

Re: 3.1.0 and java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError

Hm, I do see here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound that the site plugin needs to be updated, but we cannot do that because it causes a NullPointerException in site:stage-deploy. Gary On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > If you ch

Re: 3.1.0 and java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError

org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound > Regarding maven site plugin, it says that 3.3 is compatible with 3.1 > HTH, > Anthony > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Gary Gregory >wrote: > > > If you check out log4j 2 trunk and run: mvn clean site, you get a > &

Maven 3.1.1 and MSITE-695

Hi All: Does anyone here have the influence to get fixed or time to fix https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-695 ? This is blocking adoption of Maven 3.1 for Log4j 2. Thank you, Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition

Re: Maven Core moving to 1.6

+1 (non-binding) Gary On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind if I > update the source/target levels to 1.6 for the core? > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -- >

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life

non-binding +1 Gary On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009. > > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release. > > I would argue that we shou

Re: Java 1.5

+1 to dump Java 5. Gary Original message From: Baptiste Mathus Date:02/22/2014 17:00 (GMT-05:00) To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Java 1.5 +1 to dump Java5 compat. In about 2 months, even Java 6 will rapidly become old. We're already using Java 1.7 at our shop, an

Re: Model Version 5.0.0

You'd need a checksum for jar, javadoc, sources and so on. Also what about md5 vs sha1? Gary Original message From: Baptiste Mathus Date:03/24/2014 06:19 (GMT-05:00) To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Model Version 5.0.0 Hi, Sorry if it's the wrong thread, just le

Re: Evolving the POM format

The links are broken due to use of "localhost". Gary On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > We had the hangout yesterday. I pushed the initial bit of information > about evolving the POM format here in a blog post here: > > http://localhost:4000/2014/06/19/hangout-pom-format.h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.6.0

No regression building Apache HttpCore from git master. Gary On Sat, Oct 27, 2018, 14:49 Arnaud Héritier wrote: > +1 > > No regression found on the different projects I tested with 3.6.0 > > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 10:16 PM Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > $

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.6.0

Also, our Log4j release-2.x branch builds like a champ with this RC. Gary On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 7:32 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > No regression building Apache HttpCore from git master. > > Gary > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018, 14:49 Arnaud Héritier wrote: > >> +1 >>

Re: [VOTE] Maven Plugin Tools 3.6.0

Also works like a champ on various Apache Commons components. Gary On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 10:34 PM Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi > I'd like to release Maven plugin Tools 3.6.0 > We solved 5 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12343309&styleName=Text&projectId=

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.6.0

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:06 AM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Gary, > > On 28/10/18 03:00, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Also, our Log4j release-2.x branch builds like a champ with this RC. > > So I take this as a +1 ? > Yes, +1, but I did not say it officially since I am

Re: Drop Java 9 and 10 from asfMavenTlpStdBuild()

FWIW, we are supporting Java 8 and 11 at work. We are skipping 9 and 10. Gary On Tue, Dec 25, 2018, 14:38 Robert Scholte Java 9 and 10 have the same status as Java 1.7 right now. > Knowing that the majority of Java projects/developers will go from 1.8 to > 11 (because this is in the first LTS fo

[MJAVADOC] MJAVADOC-562

Hi All: When can we get a release with ttps:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-562 ? Thank you, Gary

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Jar manifest files carry data like "built-by" and implementation information: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/deployment/jar/packageman.html Why not reuse "Implementation-Vendor" or invent a new entry and put "Debian" in there. Maven can display this additional information on "mvn -versio

Re: 3.6.1 release?

Could you insure that you can build on Java 11 in your validation ? Gary On Thu, Feb 14, 2019, 17:29 Karl Heinz Marbaise Hi to all, > > currently there are 3 issue open in JIRA for 3.6.1: > > * MNG-6506 Mojos are unable to load package annotations on Java >= 9 > * MNG-6538 Upgrade Maven Art

Re: 3.6.1 release?

them ? > So on Java 11, you do not run into the Javadoc problem we see in Commons: "The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in URL so and so are in the unnamed module." Gary > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 15.02.19 11:38, Gary Gregory wro

Re: JDK 12: First Release Candidate available

This one is a blocker for Apache Commons to builds sites on Java 11. Can we get this in the next Java 11 release? o Build 28: JDK-8212233 : javadoc fails on jdk12 with "The code being documented uses modules but the

Re: Release maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1

Make sure it works with Java 12 and 13 EA? Gary On Sat, Mar 23, 2019, 17:22 Tibor Digana wrote: > Hey Karl. feel free to start the release process. No objections from my > side. > @Robert is there some more you want to add in the version 3.8.1? > T > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:20 PM Tibor Dig

Re: proposal for maven-archetype to switch to dom4j 2.1.1 (and Java 8)

FWIW, we are talking at work about Java 8 and 11 only these days. Java 7 is in the distant past. Most people can't even get Java 7 updates since it is EOL unless you pay. Gary On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:35 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > I agree that this should be fixed. I'm not yet convinced

Re: Move Maven 3.6.2 to 3.7.0

A minor version bump implies new functionality IMO. Gary On Thu, Jun 13, 2019, 12:29 Robert Scholte wrote: > What I would to be able to answer is: what's so special in Maven 3.7.0? > > It is also about having a good (marketing) story or being able to show > new > functionality. > > Looking at t

Re: Draft of release notes for Maven 3.6.2

FWIW, over in Apache Commons, I take the following approach when filling in the due-to attribute for an issue in changes.xml: I list the reporter first (the person who created the jira or wrote an email, then each person who participated in any way in chronological order, even if it is just making

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.7.0

I would say that fixing the Tycho issue comes first. Gary On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 8:04 AM Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > TLDR; introduce maven.experimental.buildconsumer and push Java > requirement > to Java 8 > > now that Maven 3.6.2 is out for a couple of weeks, it seems like we > didn't > f

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven 3.7.0

Java 8 as a min is fine by me FWIW. Gary On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:07 AM Tibor Digana wrote: > Sorry my important typo " I would have a problem with Java 1.8 ". > Correction " I would NOT have a problem with Java 1.8 " > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:03 PM Tibor Digana > wrote: > > > This is not

Re: [VOTE] JDK 8 Minimum Requirement for Maven 3.7.0

non-binding +1 Gary On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:11 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi to all, > > based on the discusion this is the formal VOTE to lift the minimum of > Maven Core with version 3.7.0 to JDK 8 minimum. > > Vote open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > > Kind re

Re: Updating the apache parent to automatically clean before performing a release?

You might want to take a peek at what we do over at Apache Commons. We have attempted to make things easier for ourselves with two custom Maven plugins but IMO it is still error prone and a pain. Some of the pain is due to having to perform a "double release" by pushing various files to both Nexus

Re: Proposal to deprecate Maven 3.0.x

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 3:04 PM Sesterhenn, Jörg wrote: > Hi, please let me give you a users perspective: > > 1) deprecate *every* version that is not likely to get an important > issue (even if it only concerns a core plugin) fixed timely - no matter > how old it is. Anything else is lying to yo

Re: JDK 8 Minimum Requirement for Maven Resolver 2.0

+1 non-binding. On Sat, May 9, 2020, 16:13 Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote: > Hi to all, > > based on the previous vote to require Java 8 for Maven Core - I would like > to propose setting the same minimum for Maven Resolver 2.0 > > Maven Resolver is a base component to solve dependencies for Maven.

Re: Plexus Logging API

I'm sure you all know that Apache's own Log4j 2 has it's own API facade with a backing implementation and bridges to other logging systems like SLF4 and Logback, and Java Logging. Not only that but it is actively maintained by more than a single BDFL (like yours truly) I won't debate the pros vs s

Re: JDK 15 is in Rampdown Phase One

Thanks for bringing this up Xeno. Gary On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, 06:08 Dalibor Topic wrote: > Hi Xeno, > > JDK 15 added support for CLDR 37 per > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239480 , which adds support > for the Fulah [0] language with the Adlam script per > http://cldr.unicode.org/in

No git tags?

Hi All: I do not see git tags here https://github.com/apache/maven-sources/tags Am I in the right repo? Thank you, Gary

Re: No git tags?

his helps, > > Maarten > > [1] https://source.android.com/source/using-repo > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven > [3] https://github.com/apache > > On 10/07/2020 15:57, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > I do not see git tags here https://github.com/apa

Reproducible builds, jars, bundles

Hi All, Over at Apache Commons, we are looking at creating reproducible builds via: https://github.com/apache/commons-parent/pull/9 As discussed in that thread, a bundle's "Include-Resource" manifest header has a value with file system elements in different orders depending on file system used t

Re: Reproducible builds, jars, bundles

> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le ven. 10 juil. 2020 à 16:44, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > Hi All, > > > > Over at Apache C

Re: Automatic batch-mode activation in popular CI environments

Don't forget Travis-CI. Gary On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 11:42 Martin Kanters wrote: > Hi all, > > When setting up GitHub Actions for Maven (core) two weeks ago, I initially > forgot to enable the -B/--batch-mode flag. > While this gave no issues and was easy to fix, it could be avoided by > detectin

Re: Gitbox passwords

I use my regular Apache creds. Gary On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 11:41 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Anyone happen to know what username and password I should use for > Gitbox? The credentials I use for logging into Jira and other Apache > sites don't seem to work for this. > > $ git push --set-u

Change report and its columns

Hi All: What is the best way to add columns to the change report (for example https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/changes-report.html)? I'd like to add a columns for: - "JRE Version" (for example "8") - "Javadoc" (for example, the text "Javadoc" with a URL) I do not see allowances for

Re: Change report and its columns

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:32 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > What is the best way to add columns to the change report (for example > https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/changes-report.html)? > > I'd like to add a columns for: > - "JRE Version&

Re: AW: Hacktoberfest

Which is why I am doing the same sadly over at Apache Commons and forging ahead with regular work. I considered proposing one repo but that would only open the floodgates... Gary On Sun, Oct 4, 2020, 10:11 Robert Scholte wrote: > As you know, the truth right now it is impossible to keep up. The

Re: AW: Hacktoberfest

My experience is that the better contributions come from people who need to get work done, which is usually best exemplified through bug fix PRs. If I were to manage incoming PRs for a hackathon event, I would not want to do so without a solid set of Jiras for new features and bugs, otherwise ther

Re: Rollback failed release

In general I avoid rewriting history unless I am in a PR branch and I am squashing commits before a merge. So a revert is fine IMO. Gary On Sun, Oct 11, 2020, 16:16 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > I cancelled a planned release of the maven-dependency-plugin before it > got to a vote but after it

Re: [DISCUSS] Allow attributes shorthand in pom.xml

I'd love less verbose XML. Gary On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 17:40 Will Iverson wrote: > One of the biggest complaints about Maven has long been the verbosity of > the XML format. The verbosity is due in large part to the exclusive > reliance on XML elements in Maven. > > Proposal: Allow Maven pom.xml

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Allow attributes shorthand in pom.xml

On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 6:53 AM Robert Scholte wrote: > Here's my unpopular response: I'm not going to invest in attribute support > for Maven. > If the verbosity of the pom.xml is the first thing people complain about, > well, then Maven is doing a pretty good job (if the build itself had > issu

Re: [Idea] Coding Guidelines for Maven Contribution Newbies

It would be great if one could download Eclipse or Idea settings files, or better yet, include them in each repo. Gary On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, 08:34 Sandra Parsick wrote: > Hello dev-list, > > some weeks ago, I have started creating some Pull Requests for the Maven > JLink Plugin [1]. There were

Re: Build windows-jdk15

FWIW, it might be worth switching that Java 15/16-EA build to 17-EA since 17 will be LTS. FYI, over at Apache Commons, we've found and reported bugs in Java 15 that have been fixed in 16-EA but that won't be back ported to 15. Gary On Wed, Dec 30, 2020, 08:59 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Th

Re: maven 4.0.0 new XML stuff

Great idea to record this video, TY! I would guess that the javadoc plugin would change in the same way the source plugin needs to change, right? Gary On Thu, Dec 31, 2020, 13:01 Robert Scholte wrote: > I've made a recording[1] about it, which hopefully answers most questions. > > Robert > > [

Re: APT vs Markdown formats for site docs

FYI, over at Log4j, we switched to Asciidoc. Gary On Mon, Feb 1, 2021, 05:19 Artem Krosheninnikov < artem.krosheninni...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello there, whilst looking at some docs in maven-enforcer-plugin, I found > .apt.vm format not very convenient and developer-friendly, especially for a >

Re: Official Maven Github Actions

I've been wanting such an GH action myself! Gary On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:52 PM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > Hi, > > The problems: > > Currently, the official Github actions for building and testing Java with > Maven [1] don't offer a way to specify the Maven version a workflow can > use. > Addin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.0

You are acknowledging a CVE _before_ a release? Gary On Mon, Mar 22, 2021, 15:40 Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > For the details about this release, please read > https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.8.0/release-notes.html > Also please provide feedback on the release notes. (as you know, these are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.0

Whenever I have to explain to colleagues that Maven "burns" version numbers when a release candidate fails or some other obtuse reason, they are just as baffled as I am. In the end it does not matter it's just bizarre. Gary On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, 20:58 Olivier Lamy wrote: > +0 > Same reason as R

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.0

It's pretty clear to me that the Maven release process is broken when people are getting new versions they think are real and valid when in fact it is a release candidate vote in in progress. Gary On Thu, Mar 25, 2021, 19:17 Nick Stolwijk wrote: > Also +1 (non-binding) for me. I ran a chocolat

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

In my mind, this is simple: features go into major and minor versions, maintenance versions are only for bugs, therefore a feature change is not done in a maintenance version. Gary On Sun, Mar 28, 2021, 05:47 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi all, > > Before we reroll the failed 3.8.0 I'd like we

Re: Backporting 3.8.1 security fix in 3.6.x

"we must clarify our versioning policy" Hopefully semver-ish, hopefully not "burning" version numbers when a release candidate fails, that's crazy making for users, especially for a tool as critical as Maven Gary On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, 07:44 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le ven. 2 avr. 2021 à 13:3

Re: Security/Versioning policy proposal

Well said Ralph :-) Gary On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, 02:26 Ralph Goers wrote: > FWIW, I prefer that a project (any project, not just Maven) have a > documented versioning policy that says something like “We use Semantic > Versioning [1]. We don’t skip version numbers for things someone said a > futur

@Parameter on a NIO Path

Hi All, How do I use a @Parameter on a NIO Path? I don't a place to plugin a factory of some kind. TY, Gary

Re: @Parameter on a NIO Path

ent #563525[1] > I've had the confirmation that increasing source/target of Java makes > sense. > > > thanks, > Robert > > [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=563525 > On 29-5-2021 16:07:50, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All, > > How do I use a @Par

Re: @Parameter on a NIO Path

May 29, 2021 at 5:03 PM Robert Scholte > wrote: > > > Someone needs to implement #563525[1] > > I've had the confirmation that increasing source/target of Java makes > > sense. > > > > > > thanks, > > Robert > > > > [1] https

Re: Moving away from Modello

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 8:30 AM Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 1:02 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold > wrote: > > > What do folks think about slowly moving away from Modello where > > feasible to simplify the build? Does anyone find Modello a net > > positive, especially in longterm ma

Re: Moving away from Modello

ore to all plugins, then I would be +1 for that. > But we should stay with modello until there are PRs for core and ALL > plugins, to prevent a mix. > -Markus > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwo

Re: JPMS, Maven and test jars

It feels to me like JPMS just plainly breaks the informal industry standard of the Maven project layout we have all been using for a million years. In addition, how is one supposed to test package private code if a test jar tests a main jar where all packages are now different? This seems like a p

Re: JPMS, Maven and test jars

test and makes whitebox testing impossible. Less testing is not more brittle. Bummer. Gary On Tue, Jun 22, 2021, 16:20 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:32 PM Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > In addition, how is one supposed to test package private code if a

Re: JPMS, Maven and test jars

Some of the code is shared on the test side just like you shared code on the main side, there is nothing unusual abour that. For example test infrastructure, utilities, JUnit rules, and do on. Gary On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, 02:54 Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:32 PM G

Re: JDK 17 related plugin releases

Note that the current version of ASM is 9.2. Gary On Wed, Aug 18, 2021, 03:49 Maarten Mulders wrote: > Well, that was a short ride - the latest release of the > maven-plugin-tools is already up-to-date, as it uses ASM 9.1. > > Same goes for the maven-dependency-plugin; latest release is also on

Re: Request for Enhancement: Dependency Overrides

A use case to watch out for esp with "sidecar" files: Dev X's artifact "deprecates" Dev Y's artifact when in fact these two are just competitors. Gary On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, 05:59 Enno Thieleke wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I'll take this as a "go ahead, if it's good we'll accept it". > > Just a few

Re: (prop) Canonical property storage

Just FYI: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collections4/properties/SortedProperties.html Gary On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 03:20 Michael Osipov wrote: > Correct. The average use does not care about sorting, so he won't be > affected by a constantly sort

Re: Regression in Maven 3.8.2? site/javadoc generation fails

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7215 and the short thread here "Wrong site skin in 3.8.2 vs 3.6.3" Gary On Fri, Sep 3, 2021, 08:08 Stefan Seifert wrote: > i've encountered a problem in numerous of our Maven builds at wcm.io [1] > which started failing yesterday when GitHub switche

Re: Regression in Maven 3.8.2? site/javadoc generation fails

n.system.issuet > >abpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17400589 which reverts the change from > >MGN-7170, and it fixes the problem with getting the right skin for the > >site, but did not fix the problem with the dependencies in javadoc > >generation described here initially. &g

Re: Regression in Maven 3.8.2? site/javadoc generation fails

his month. > > M > > Am 2021-09-05 um 16:46 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > Hopefully 3.8.3 is around the corner. > > > > Gary > > > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021, 11:09 Stefan Seifert .invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> hello falko. > >> > &g

Re: Upcoming Maven 3.8.4

HI All: I discovered a regression this morning that prevents me from creating a release candidate for Apache Commons CLI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7316 https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/601 May this be included for 3.8.4 please? Gary On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 3:48 PM Falko Mo

Re: Upcoming Maven 3.8.4

sage > > but it is discussion for another place, here I only point it > > > sob., 23 paź 2021 o 22:51 Gary Gregory > napisał(a): > > > HI All: > > > > I discovered a regression this morning that prevents me from creating > > a release candidate for Apache

Re: GitHub Actions on Maven projects

At first glance, I can't tell if my projects would benefit from this plugin or not. It seems to me the readme assumes to much domain knowledge. Gary On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, 12:13 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We have created maven-gh-actions-shared [1] with the first shared workflow. > I ho

Re: Any reason xi:include is not allowed?

The parsers I've seen don't "prevent" XI, you have to enable the feature; note that some folks don't like DTD processing and XI for security reasons. Gary On Wed, Nov 17, 2021, 09:17 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi all, > > Almost everything is in the subject: any reason our pom parser prevents

Re: Surefire next release

At work, some of my colleagues balk at seeing milestone versions in our builds. What is preventing the next version from being "3.0.0", no "M". I thought I read here a while back that the code was production ready. Gary On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, 12:26 Olivier Lamy wrote: > Sounds good. > I'd really

Re: Using of Travis

FWIW, I plan on doing the same for most Apache Commons components. Gary On Mon, Dec 20, 2021, 11:22 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > +1 to drop Travis, for multiple reasons > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:52 AM Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As the primary CI environment we use J

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Plugin Tools version 3.6.3

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 10:20 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2022-01-08 um 15:24 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: > > Ok, > > I see now. > > > > But the problem still exists ... > > m-p-p can not be used with Nexus staging maven plugin > > > > Looking into nexus staging plugin [1] I'm afraid that will

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven JAR Plugin version 3.2.1

Congrats! :-) Gary On Sat, Jan 8, 2022, 14:53 Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > The vote has passed with the following result: > > +1: Hervé Boutemy, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Romain Manni-Bucau, Michael > Osipov, Tamás Cservenák, Jason van Zyl, Arnaud Héritier > > PMC quorum: reached > > I will prom

Formal identification of license in a POM license element

Hi All: While researching GitHub's citation support [1], I found that there is a plugin to convert a pom.xml into a CFF file [2]. I'd like to generate a CFF file for Apache Commons Components like Commons Lang, Commons IO, and so on. This plugin works but does not generate a license field [3] beca

Re: Formal identification of license in a POM license element

Hi Michael, I'm looking for an intersection where Maven and this CFF plugin can be made to work together, I don't know where that is. I'd be willing to offer a PR here or there but there would need to be agreement on what the solution would be. Gary On Sat, Feb 12, 2022, 04:48 Michael Osipov wr

Re: Maven Dependency Plugin - Log4j vulnerabilities

Do note that reload4j is not 100% compatible with log4j 1.2.17, code has just be deleted to "fix" some CVEs. Gary On Thu, Mar 3, 2022, 08:37 Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > All of the (known) remaining log4j1.x security bugs (none of which are as > severe as log4shell) are fixed in reload4j 1.2.18+. I

Re: Maven Dependency Plugin - Log4j vulnerabilities

Also note that in log4j 2.17.2 that was released a few days ago, I added many improvements to the log4j-1.2-api module which aims to provide compatibility with 1.2. Gary On Thu, Mar 3, 2022, 08:37 Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > All of the (known) remaining log4j1.x security bugs (none of which are as

Re: Maven Release Plugin 3.0.0-M6

Can someone explain the M release meaning? Is it an alpha release? A beta version? Is it production ready? Does it depend on the plugin (please say no)? Gary On Tue, Apr 26, 2022, 07:49 Samuel Le Berrigaud wrote: > Hello devs, > > I'd just like to get an idea of when a potential 3.0.0-M6 of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin version 4.0.0-M1

FWIW, from my POV milestones are confusing because there is no roadmap for what the milestones ahead are, unlike what Eclipse usually does for example. Instead from this user's POV milestones feel like static snapshots without expectations set, unlike an alpha or a beta which most people have an un

AbstractMethodError at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.render.ReportDocumentRenderer.renderDocument

Hi all, I am not sure which component broke binary compatibility for the Apache RAT plugin, so I am emailing here. This happens in Apache Commons Parent git master with Maven 3.8.5 running the default mvn goal for our POM: (If my mailer uglies this up, it is also here https://gist.github.com/gary

Re: Proposing various improvements

Bad idea unless you can look at each call site and _guarantee_ that you want an immutable Collection instead of a mutable one... which I do not see how you can do especially once a Collection escapes an API. Unless you're ok with breaking behavioral compatibility... Gary On Thu, May 19, 2022, 02:

Re: Proposing various improvements

ace the value (collection?) > with a new one and not modify the actual one. What do you think? > > Regards > > > Le 19 mai 2022 à 13:23, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > > > Bad idea unless you can look at each call site and _guarantee_ that you > > want an immutable Collec

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.8.6 released

It can take a few hours to sync up... Gary On Sat, Jun 11, 2022, 16:46 Dan Tran wrote: > Thanks for releasing this needed release > > looks like it is slow to appear at maven central? [1] > > -D > > [1] https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/ > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 a

AbstractMethodError at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.render.ReportDocumentRenderer.renderDocument

Hi All, I'm looking for help in how to remedy an AbstractMethodError at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.render.ReportDocumentRenderer.renderDocument Running: git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-dbcp.git cd commons-dbcp maven clean site -DskipTests Any thoughts? [INFO] Generatin

Re: AbstractMethodError at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.render.ReportDocumentRenderer.renderDocument

dehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.mainWithExitCode (Launcher.java:406) at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.main (Launcher.java:347) Can this be fixed in a new site plugin release? Is the JDepend plugin dead and should be in the attic? No releases since 2014. Gary > > (package was needed as then japicmp wo

Source plugin site out of date

Hi all, The current version seems to be 3.2.1 but the site says 3.2.0. Gary

Re: AbstractMethodError at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.render.ReportDocumentRenderer.renderDocument

(Sorry for the top post) So it sounds like the simplest from a user's POV is to wait for JDepend 2.1. Gary On Sat, Jul 16, 2022, 16:21 Michael Osipov wrote: > Gary, > > went through. It is jdepend-maven-plugin only. With: > > D:\Entwicklung\Projekte\commons-dbcp [master ≡ +0 ~1 -0 !]> git diff

Re: AbstractMethodError at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.render.ReportDocumentRenderer.renderDocument

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 7:04 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > > Am 2022-07-17 um 13:02 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > (Sorry for the top post) So it sounds like the simplest from a user's POV > > is to wait for JDepend 2.1. > > Technically yes, but given the requirements I have

Apache RAT plugin and .gitattributes

It looks like the Apache RAT plugin tries to validate the .gitattributes file (in contrast to excluding .gitignore). Is that an issue to be fixed or documented? Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For

  1   2   3   4   >