>
> Therefore, it is a change in a major version.
Sure, but that's not the problem I see. I think we're moving away from
convention over configuration as there is now no default release profile
but the end user needs to configure one. Not too happy about that.
> Do you care to create an issue
Am 2016-06-13 um 15:47 schrieb Anders Hammar:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2016-06-11 um 15:25 schrieb Anders Hammar:
Even if this (breaking) change is for v3.0.0 of the plugin, I'm missing
some clear docs about how it is supposed to work
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2016-06-11 um 15:25 schrieb Anders Hammar:
>
>> Even if this (breaking) change is for v3.0.0 of the plugin, I'm missing
>> some clear docs about how it is supposed to work from now on. Specifically
>> for the plugin
Am 2016-06-11 um 15:25 schrieb Anders Hammar:
Even if this (breaking) change is for v3.0.0 of the plugin, I'm missing
some clear docs about how it is supposed to work from now on. Specifically
for the plugin I assume that the idea is that the release profile to use
should be specified
Well I always end up with multiple release profiles because different orgs
need different GPG signing keys etc...
On Saturday, 11 June 2016, Anders Hammar wrote:
> Even if this (breaking) change is for v3.0.0 of the plugin, I'm missing
> some clear docs about how it is
Even if this (breaking) change is for v3.0.0 of the plugin, I'm missing
some clear docs about how it is supposed to work from now on. Specifically
for the plugin I assume that the idea is that the release profile to use
should be specified explicitly? Also, if the releaseProfile in the
super-POM
Ah sorry...
did saw this issue is already scheduled on 3.0...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
On 6/11/16 9:00 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
This will break backward compatibility in a minor version which is not a
good idea..This something for 3.0.0
Marking as deprecated good idea...but
Hi,
This will break backward compatibility in a minor version which is not a
good idea..This something for 3.0.0
Marking as deprecated good idea...but changing the default...Hm..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 6/10/16 11:20 PM, micha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: michaelo
Date: